The evolving extension environment: implications for dairy scientists
C. Murphy A D , R. Nettle B and M. Paine C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Dairy Australia, Farm Productivity & Delivery, Level 5, IBM Centre, 60 City Road, Southbank, Vic. 3006, Australia.
B University of Melbourne, School of Land and Environment, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, Melbourne, Vic. 3190, Australia.
C DairyNZ, People & Business, Newstead, New Zealand.
D Corresponding author. Email: cmurphy@dairyaustralia.com.au
Animal Production Science 53(9) 917-923 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12347
Submitted: 1 October 2012 Accepted: 22 May 2013 Published: 16 July 2013
Abstract
This paper reviews current challenges in the Australian extension environment and provides a case for developing an adaptive extension platform for the dairy sector in Australia and New Zealand, to support evolving dairy farm systems. The variation in the public-sector engagement in extension, the diversity and number of extension providers and a relatively uncoordinated approach to define new extension roles, functions and professional requirements are current challenges for dairy extension across Australia. In the dairy sector, these challenges coincide with increasing demand for a responsive research, development, extension and education system in supporting the rapid evolution in dairy farming systems. Addressing these challenges is not an issue for extension alone; however, the required level of integration among research, development, extension and education in an environment where needs are changing and resources are scarce demands an engaged dairy-science profession. Drawing on international extension and agricultural innovation-system literature and earlier empirical research, the following three areas for development are proposed: (1) a professional development strategy that incorporates (i) an understanding of the new professional situations extension works within, (ii) leadership in cross-industry and cross-sector coordination concerning the nature of the changing client in research, development, extension and education system and (iii) clear priorities for extension; (2) a professional development plan that incorporates a workplace-learning approach; and (3) for extension specialists to be engaged in defining research priorities, the agenda for change and suitable pathways for change alongside other professional groups, including farming. This development agenda will, however, require an adaptive extension platform to advance these areas on behalf of farmers and public stakeholders.
References
Biggs SD (1990) A multiple source of innovation model of agricultural research and technology promotion. World Development 18, 1481–1499.| A multiple source of innovation model of agricultural research and technology promotion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Biggs S (2007) Building on the positive: an actor innovation approach to finding and promoting pro-poor institutional and technical innovations. International Journal Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 6, 144–164.
| Building on the positive: an actor innovation approach to finding and promoting pro-poor institutional and technical innovations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Botha N, Coutts J, Roth H (2008) The role of agricultural consultants in New Zealand in environmental extension. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 14, 125–138.
| The role of agricultural consultants in New Zealand in environmental extension.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boxelaar L, Paine M, Beilin R (2006) Community engagement and public administration: of silos, overlays and technologies of government. Australian Journal of Public Administration 65, 113–126.
| Community engagement and public administration: of silos, overlays and technologies of government.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cerf M, Hemidy L (1999) Designing support to enhance co-operation between farmers and advisors in solving farm management problems. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 6, 157–170.
| Designing support to enhance co-operation between farmers and advisors in solving farm management problems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cerf M, Guillot MN, Orly P (2011) Acting as a change agent in supporting sustainable agriculture: how to cope with new professional situations? Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17, 7–19.
| Acting as a change agent in supporting sustainable agriculture: how to cope with new professional situations?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coutts J (2001) Five domains of extension: a Queensland perspective. In ‘ExtensionNet: Newsletter of the Australasia-Pacific Extension Network Inc., Vol. 8’.
Dairy Moving Forward (2010) Research, development and extension priorities for the Australian dairy industry. Dairy Australia, Melbourne.
Demeter RM, Meuwissen MPM, Oude Lansink AGJM, Van Arendonk JAM (2009) Scenarios for a future dairy chain in the Netherlands. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Science 56, 301–323.
DPIV (2008) ‘Better services to farmers – delivered by DPI/Farm Services Victoria.’(The State of Victoria: Melbourne)
DPIV (2011) ‘DPI Victoria extension policy & operating context.’ (The State of Victoria: Melbourne)
Eastwood CR, Chapman DF, Paine MS (2012) Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia. Agricultural Systems 108, 10–18.
| Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Elzen B, Barbier M, Cerf M, Grin J (2012) Stimulating transitions towards sustainable farming systems. In ‘Farming systems research into the 21st century: the new dynamic’. (Eds I Darnhofer, D Gibbon, B Dedieu) pp. 431–456. (Springer: London)
García SC, Fulkerson WJ (2005) Opportunities for future Australian dairy systems: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1041–1055.
| Opportunities for future Australian dairy systems: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hall AJ (2002) Innovation systems and capacity development: agenda for north–south research collaboration. The International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 1, 146–152.
| Innovation systems and capacity development: agenda for north–south research collaboration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hall A (2005) Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: an innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it. International Journal of Development 17, 611–630.
| Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: an innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hall A (2006) Public-private partnerships in an agricultural system of innovation: concepts and challenges. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 5, 3–20.
| Public-private partnerships in an agricultural system of innovation: concepts and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Howells J (2006) Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35, 715–728.
| Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunt W, Birch C, Coutts J, Vanclay F (2012) The many turnings of agricultural extension in Australia. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 18, 9–26.
| The many turnings of agricultural extension in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jiggins J (2001) Inter-active R, D&E. Livestock Production Science 72, 25–36.
| Inter-active R, D&E.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kenny SN (2002) A process for practice: learning for change in the Dairy Industry. MAgSci Thesis, The University of Melbourne.
Kenny S, Nettle R (2006) Extension as a knowledge partner in farming systems research – early lessons from ‘FutureDairy’ Australia. In ‘New visions for rural areas – changing European farming systems for a better future’. (Eds N Roling, H Langeveld) pp. 325–329. (Wageningen University Press: Wageningen, The Netherlands)
Klerkx L, Leeuwis C (2008a) Institutionalizing end-user demand steering in agricultural R&D: farmer levy funding of R&D in The Netherlands. Research Policy 37, 460–472.
| Institutionalizing end-user demand steering in agricultural R&D: farmer levy funding of R&D in The Netherlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klerkx L, Leeuwis C (2008b) Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: experiences with innovation intermediaries. Food Policy 33, 260–276.
| Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: experiences with innovation intermediaries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klerkx L, Leeuwis C (2009) Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers and different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76, 849–860.
| Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers and different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klerkx L, Nettle R (2013) Achievements and challenges of innovation co-production support initiatives in the Australian and Dutch dairy sectors: a comparative study. Food Policy 40, 74–89.
| Achievements and challenges of innovation co-production support initiatives in the Australian and Dutch dairy sectors: a comparative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klerkx L, Aarts N, Leeuwis C (2010) Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems 103, 390–400.
| Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Markham N, Crawford A, Coulson J, Drysdale G, Hildebrand K, Mezenberg C, Michael A, O’Connor R, Paine M, Shambrook D (2006) A learning approach to developing farming systems advisory skills. In ‘Practice change for sustainable communities: exploring footprint, pathways and possibilities. Proceedings of the 2006 APEN international conference, 3–6 March, Beechworth, Victoria’. Available at http://www.regional.org.au/au/apen/2006/refereed/6/3023_markham.htm#TopOfPage [Verified 14 June 2013]
Nettle R, Lamb G (2010) Water security: how can extension work with farming worldviews? Extension Farming Systems Journal 6, 11–22.
Nettle R, Paine M (2009) Water security and farming systems: implications for advisory practice and policy-making. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 15, 147–160.
| Water security and farming systems: implications for advisory practice and policy-making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nettle RA, Paine M (2011) Capacity building in farming systems. In ‘Shaping change: natural resource management, agriculture and the role of extension’. (Eds J Jennings, R Packham, D Woodside) pp. 196–210. (Australasia-Pacific Extension Network: Wodonga, Vic.)
Nettle RA, Waters W (2010) Client-centred RD&E: a process and some tools for understanding the changing client to improve RD&E services. Report to Dairy Moving Forward steering committee, Rural Innovation Research Group, The University of Melbourne.
Nettle R, Paine M, Penry J (2010a) Aligning farm decision making and genetic information systems to improve animal production: methodology and findings from the Australian dairy industry. Animal Production Science 50, 429–434.
| Aligning farm decision making and genetic information systems to improve animal production: methodology and findings from the Australian dairy industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nettle R, McKenzie J, Coutts J, Boehm R, Saunders D, Wythes C, Fisher J, O’Sullivan J, Kelly S (2010b) Making capacity building theory practical: the ‘On the Fast Track’ project. Extension Farming Systems Journal 6, 73–82.
Nettle R, Brightling P, Hope A (2013) How programme teams progress agricultural innovation in the Australian dairy industry. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 19, 271–290.
PISC (2012) A national approach to extension by PISC agencies. PISC discussion paper. Primary Industries Ministerial Council, Canberra. Available at http://www.mincos.gov.au [Verified 19 June 2013]
Rivera WM (2011) Public sector agricultural extension system reform and the challenges ahead. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17, 165–180.
| Public sector agricultural extension system reform and the challenges ahead.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Röling N (2009) Pathways for impact: scientists’ different perspectives on agricultural innovation. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 7, 83–94.
| Pathways for impact: scientists’ different perspectives on agricultural innovation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
SELN (2006) State extension leaders network. Available at http://www.seln.org.au/attachments/uploads/061205SELN_Enabling_change_12pp.pdf [verified 30 May 2013]
Sorenson T (2011) Australian agricultural R&D and innovation systems. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 7, 192–212.
| Australian agricultural R&D and innovation systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swanson H (1975) Are extension workers professionals? Journal of Extension January/February, 17–21.
van Dijk G, van Boekel P (2001) Governance of innovation in animal production: new roles for science, business and the public sector. Livestock Production Science 72, 9–23.
| Governance of innovation in animal production: new roles for science, business and the public sector.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waters W, Thomson D, Nettle R (2009) Derived attitudinal farmer segments: a method for understanding and working with the diversity of Australian dairy farmers. Extension Farming Systems Journal 5, 47–57.
Weatherley J (2012) Farmlets as learning platforms for the Australian Dairy Industry. PhD Thesis, University of Tasmania, Hobart.
Weick K (2002) Puzzles in organizational learning. British Journal of Management 13, S7–S15.
| Puzzles in organizational learning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woodhill J, Röling N (1998) ‘In facilitating sustainable agriculture.’ (Eds N Röling, MAE Wagemakers) pp. 46–71. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
