Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of monensin inclusion in supplements for cattle consuming low quality tropical forage

S. R. McLennan A D , M. J. Callaghan B , A. J. Swain C and J. F. Kidd C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The University of Queensland, Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Ecosciences Precinct, GPO Box 267, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.

B Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd, 1325 Boundary Road, Wacol, Qld 4076, Australia.

C Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Ecosciences Precinct, GPO Box 267, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: s.mclennan@uq.edu.au

Animal Production Science 52(7) 624-629 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11273
Submitted: 7 November 2011  Accepted: 7 February 2012   Published: 5 April 2012

Abstract

A pen feeding study was carried out over 70 days to determine the effects of monensin (M) inclusion in two commercial supplements designed to provide different planes of nutrition to recently weaned steers. Thirty Bos indicus crossbred steers (191.4 ± s.d. 7.1 kg) were individually fed a low quality pangola grass hay (57 g crude protein/kg DM; 497 g/kg DM digestibility) ad libitum (Control) with either a urea/molasses-based supplement of Rumevite Maxi-graze 60 Block (B), fed at 100 g/day, or grain-based Rumevite Weaner Pellets (WP), fed at 7.5 g/kg liveweight (W).day, both with and without M, viz. B, B+M, WP and WP+M, respectively. There were no significant interactions between supplement type and M inclusion for any measurement. Growth rates (main effects) averaged 0.17, 0.35 and 0.58 kg/day for the Control, B and WP supplements, respectively, with all means different (P < 0.05), while the response (P < 0.05) to M across supplement type was 0.11 kg/day. Hay DM intake was similar for the Control and B treatments (18.6 and 19.6 g/kg W.day) but was reduced (P < 0.05) with the WP supplement (16.8 g/kg W.day) while corresponding total DM intakes increased from 18.6 to 20.0 to 23.5 g/kg W.day (all differences P < 0.05), respectively. Monensin inclusion in the supplements did not affect supplement, hay or total DM intake. Inclusion of M in supplements for grazing weaners in northern Australia may increase survival rates although the effect of M with cattle at liveweight maintenance or below requires further investigation.


References

AOAC (1975) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC)

AOAC (1980) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC)

AOAC (2006) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ Standard method 997.04. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD)

Bretschneider G, Elizalde JC, Perez FA (2008) The effect of feeding antibiotic growth promoters on the performance of beef cattle consuming forage-based diets: a review. Livestock Science 114, 135–149.
The effect of feeding antibiotic growth promoters on the performance of beef cattle consuming forage-based diets: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dixon RM, Coates DB (2010) Diet quality estimated with faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy and responses to N supplementation by cattle grazing buffel grass pastures. Animal Feed Science and Technology 158, 115–125.
Diet quality estimated with faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy and responses to N supplementation by cattle grazing buffel grass pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmvVSrsro%3D&md5=7e9f303efa1d985815654780be476db2CAS |

Ernst AJ, Limpus JF, O’Rourke PK (1975) Effect of supplements of molasses and urea on intake and digestibility of native pasture hay by steers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 451–455.
Effect of supplements of molasses and urea on intake and digestibility of native pasture hay by steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GHS (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497–509.

Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (2004) The GRAZPLAN animal biology model for sheep and cattle and the GrazFeed decision support tool. CSIRO Plant Industry Technical Paper. Available at http://www.csiro.au/proprietaryDocuments/TechPaper_Aug04.pdf [Verified 8 March 2011]

Gardener BA, Owens FN, Wagner JT, Ball R, Gill DR (1999) Impact of implants and monensin on weight of steers fed at maintenance. In ‘Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report’. pp. 100–106.

Genstat (2006) ‘Genstat for Windows.’ 9th edn. (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Goodrich RD, Garrett JE, Gast DR, Kirick MA, Larson DA, Meiske JC (1984) Influence of monensin on the performance of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 58, 1484–1498.

Holroyd RG, O’Rourke PK, Tyler R, Stephenson HP, Mason GWJ, Schroter KL (1990) Effect of different weaning strategies on postweaning growth rate, mortality and fertility of Bos indicus cross cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 1–6.
Effect of different weaning strategies on postweaning growth rate, mortality and fertility of Bos indicus cross cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MAFF (1975) ‘Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants.’ UK Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Technical Bulletin No. 33. (HMSO: London)

McLennan SR, Dunster PJ, O’Rourke PK, Murphy GM (1981) Comparison of dry season urea supplements containing salt, sulphur or molasses for steers grazing native pasture in the dry tropics of northern Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 21, 457–463.
Comparison of dry season urea supplements containing salt, sulphur or molasses for steers grazing native pasture in the dry tropics of northern Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McLennan SR, Hirst DJ, O’Rourke PK (1984) Effect of molasses and nitrogen supplements on the liveweight performance of weaner heifers grazing tropical pastures. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15, 718

Moore JE, Brant MH, Kunkle WE, Hopkins DI (1999) Effect of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility and animal performance. Journal of Animal Science 77, 122–135.

Potter EL, Vanduyn RL, Cooley CO (1984) Monensin toxicity in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 58, 1499–1511.

Potter EL, Muller RD, Wray MI, Carroll LH, Meyer RM (1986) Effect of monensin on the performance of cattle on pasture or fed harvested forages in confinement. Journal of Animal Science 62, 583–592.

Romero VA, Siebert BD, Murray RM (1976) A study on the effect of frequency of urea ingestion on the utilization of low quality roughage by steers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 16, 308–314.
A study on the effect of frequency of urea ingestion on the utilization of low quality roughage by steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sweeney RA (1989) Generic combustion method for determination of crude protein in feeds – collaborative study. Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists 72, 770–774.

Wilkinson JID, Appleby WGC, Shaw CJ, Lebas G, Pflug R (1980) The use of monensin in European pasture cattle. Animal Production 31, 159–162.
The use of monensin in European pasture cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Winks L (1984) Cattle growth in the dry tropics of Australia. In ‘Australian Meat Research Committee Review, No. 45’. pp. 1–43.

Winks L, Laing AR, Stokoe J (1972) Level of urea for grazing yearling cattle during the dry season in tropical Queensland. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9, 258–261.