Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with vine peas

Y. Zhu A , C. S. Bai B , X. S. Guo C F , Y. L. Xue D and Kazuo Ataku E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People’s Republic of China.

B College of Gardening, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, People’s Republic of China.

C MOE Key Laboratory of Arid and Grassland Ecology, School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, People’s Republic of China.

D Institute of Grassland Sciences, Inner Mongolia Agricultural and Animal Sciences College, Hohhot 010030, People’s Republic of China.

E Department of Dairy Science, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu 069-8501, Japan.

F Corresponding author. Email: guoxsh07@lzu.edu.cn

Animal Production Science 51(12) 1117-1122 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11125
Submitted: 2 May 2011  Accepted: 14 October 2011   Published: 18 November 2011

Abstract

Combining corn with legumes for silage is a feasible strategy to improve crude protein concentration in corn silage. This study was conducted to determine the fermentation characteristics and overall nutritive value of ensiled corn (Zea mays L.), vine peas (Pisum sativum L.), and mixtures of the two crops at three different ratios. The two crops were ensiled in corn/pea mixtures containing 0, 33, 50, 67, and 100% corn in vacuumed plastic bags for 60 days at room temperature. The addition of peas to corn crude protein and dry matter concentrations in the ensiled forages had a negligible influence on neutral detergent fibre concentration compared with corn silage. Corn silage had a greater (P < 0.05) lactic acid concentration than vine peas silage and the mixtures. There were no differences (P > 0.05) in in vitro dry matter and neutral detergent fibre digestibility among the silages made from the vine peas, corn, and mixtures. Improved fermentation characteristics were obtained in vine peas and corn mixture silage at a ratio of 33 : 67 compared with the other mixtures and vine peas silage. Results generated from this study suggest that combining vine peas with corn for silage could provide livestock with not only a high energy concentration feed, but a high concentration of crude protein as well.

Additional keywords: fermentation quality, in vitro digestibility.


References

Albrecht KA, Beauchemin KA (2003) Alfalfa and other perennial legume silage. In ‘Silage science and technology’. (Eds DR Buxton, RE Muck, JH Harrison) pp. 633–664. (ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Madison, WI)

Albrecht KA, Muck RE (1991) Proteolysis in ensiled forage legumes that vary in tannin concentration. Crop Science 31, 464–469.
Proteolysis in ensiled forage legumes that vary in tannin concentration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXkvFSqsbs%3D&md5=c9f453c1d6fd45b770942bf3e85a08e9CAS |

Aman P (1993) Composition and structure of cell wall polysaccharides in forages. In ‘Forage cell wall structure and digestibility’. (Eds HG Jung, DR Buxton, RD Hatfield, J Ralph) pp. 183–199. (ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Madison, WI)

Anil L, Park J, Phipps RH (2000) The potential of forage-maize intercrops in ruminant nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 86, 157–164.
The potential of forage-maize intercrops in ruminant nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Armstrong KL, Albrecht KA, Lauer JG, Riday H (2008) Intercropping corn with lablab bean, velvet bean, and scarlet runner bean for forage. Crop Science 48, 371–379.
Intercropping corn with lablab bean, velvet bean, and scarlet runner bean for forage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 15th edn. (AOAC: Arlington, VA)

Bjorge M (1996) Ensiling Process. Agriculture Food and Rural Development. Available at www.agric.gov.ab.ca/crops/forage/silage2.html [Verified 2 May 2011]

Broderick GA, Kang JH (1980) Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acid in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 64–75.
Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acid in ruminal fluid and in vitro media.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3cXhsValu7s%3D&md5=b95e78ac1ae948a5182ec99520d4c8aeCAS |

Carruthers K, Prithiviraj B, Fe Q, Cloutier D, Martin RC, Smith DL (2000) Intercropping of corn with soybean, lupin and forages: silage yield and quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 185, 177–185.
Intercropping of corn with soybean, lupin and forages: silage yield and quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Choung JJ, Thomas PC, Chamberlain DG (1987) Ammonia absorption from the rumen as a factor regulating voluntary feed intake in cattle given silage diets. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th Silage Conference, Hurley, UK’. pp. 153–154.

Contreras-Govea FE, Albrecht KA, Muck RE (2006) Spring yield and silage characteristics of kura clover, winter wheat, and in mixtures. Agronomy Journal 98, 781–787.
Spring yield and silage characteristics of kura clover, winter wheat, and in mixtures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Contreras-Govea FE, Muck RE, Armstrong KL, Albrecht KA (2009) Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with climbing beans. Animal Feed Science and Technology 150, 1–8.
Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with climbing beans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjvV2nu7Y%3D&md5=c5cb1e63d5e59d75a02524f59a66b840CAS |

Dawo MI, Wilkinson JM, Sanders FET, Pilbeam DJ (2007) The yield and quality of fresh and ensiled plant material from intercropping maize (Zea mays) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 87, 1391–1399.
The yield and quality of fresh and ensiled plant material from intercropping maize (Zea mays) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXlsVWktrc%3D&md5=2a25107fa1a4b869e6e296563605b6b5CAS |

Dinić B, Dordevic N, Jasmina R, Snezana I (2005) Modern procedures in technology of conserving lucerne by ensiling. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 21, 297–303.
Modern procedures in technology of conserving lucerne by ensiling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eichelberger L, Siewerdt L, Silveira P (1997) Effects of the inclusion of soybean or cowpea plants and the use of inoculant on the quality of corn silage. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 26, 667–674.

Givens DI, Rulquin H (2004) Utilization by ruminants of nitrogen compounds in silage-based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 1–18.
Utilization by ruminants of nitrogen compounds in silage-based diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjtFanu7g%3D&md5=a1c1574faaf72b955b411608c58eca02CAS |

Hatfield RD (1993) Cell wall polysaccharide interactions and digestibility. In ‘Forage cell wall structure and digestibility’. (Eds HG Jung, DR Buxton, RD Hatfield, J Ralph) pp. 285–313. (ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Madison, WI)

Kung JL, Stokes MR, Lin CJ (2003) Silage additives. In ‘Silage science and technology’. (Eds DR Buxton, RE Muck, JH Harrison) pp. 305–360. (ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Madison, WI)

Licitra G, Hernandez TM, Van Soest PJ (1996) Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 347–358.
Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McDonald P, Henderson AR (1964) Determination of water-soluble carbohydrates in grass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 15, 395–398.
Determination of water-soluble carbohydrates in grass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF2cXks1eju7s%3D&md5=7fccc10c6b80fde0e96feaed36f42f63CAS |

McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE (Eds) (1991) ‘The biochemistry of silage.’ 2nd edn. (Chalcombe Publishers, Cambrian Printers, Ltd: Aberystwyth, Wales)

Muck RE (1987) Dry matter level effects on alfalfa silage quality I. Nitrogen transformations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 30, 7–14.

Mustafa AF, Seguin P (2003) Characteristics and in situ degradability of whole crop faba bean, pea, and soybean silage. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83, 793–799.
Characteristics and in situ degradability of whole crop faba bean, pea, and soybean silage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Research Council (2001) ‘Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle.’ 7th rev. edn. (National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC)

Owens VN, Albrecht KA, Muck RE, Duke SH (1999) Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates. Crop Science 39, 1873–1880.
Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Papadopoulos YA, McKersie BD (1983) A comparison of protein degradation during wilting and ensiling of six forage species. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63, 903–912.
A comparison of protein degradation during wilting and ensiling of six forage species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXms12gsg%3D%3D&md5=647684de887c14dbde22b41496f645b7CAS |

Sun HR (2010) Forage cultivation and management. Available at http://www.forage.org.cn [Verified 6 December 2010]

Thomas C, Wilkinson JM, Tayler JC (1975) The utilization of maize silage for intensive beef production I. The effect of level and source of supplementary nitrogen on the utilization of maize silage by cattle. The Journal of Agricultural Science 84, 353–364.
The utilization of maize silage for intensive beef production I. The effect of level and source of supplementary nitrogen on the utilization of maize silage by cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tilley JMA, Terry RA (1963) A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.
A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF3sXks1Cmurk%3D&md5=3fce64138ad7541fff0cd15d7f86f33eCAS |

Titterton M, Maasdorp BV (1997) Nutritional improvement of maize silage for dairying mixed crop silages from sole and intercropped legumes and a long season variety of maize. 2. Ensilage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 69, 263–270.
Nutritional improvement of maize silage for dairying mixed crop silages from sole and intercropped legumes and a long season variety of maize. 2. Ensilage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FnvVCltA%3D%3D&md5=42d2516f43d4e2cba84245d95aa39583CAS |

Whiter AG, Kung JL (2001) The effect of a dry or liquid application of Lactobcillus plantarum MTD1 on the fermentation of alfalfa silage. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 2195–2202.
The effect of a dry or liquid application of Lactobcillus plantarum MTD1 on the fermentation of alfalfa silage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnvV2ks7c%3D&md5=f56951a957efa9d64c78c41ed9e12958CAS |

Wilkinson JM, Newman G, Allen DM (Eds) (1998) ‘Maize: producing and feeding maize silage.’ (Chalcombe Publications: Lincoln, UK)

Xu QF (2006) The effect of different storage time and dilution previous fermented juice on bagged alfalfa silage. Grassland Science 14, 129–133. [In Chinese]