Relationships between rank-related behaviour, antler cycle timing and antler growth in deer: behavioural aspects
L. Bartoš A C and G. A. Bubenik B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Praha 10 – Uhříněves, 104 01, Czech Republic.
B Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
C Corresponding author. Email: bartos@vuzv.cz
Animal Production Science 51(4) 303-310 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10195
Submitted: 1 October 2010 Accepted: 28 November 2010 Published: 8 April 2011
Abstract
In this review we offer a synthesis of a 30-year-long investigation focussed on the relationship between dominance rank-related behaviour and the timing and growth of antlers in deer. Our studies related primarily to red and fallow deer. We present evidence to suggest that dominance-related behaviour in male deer is strong enough to influence both antler cycle timing and antler growth. In a study on captive red deer we observed that the males of higher rank cast their antlers first and also tended to shed the velvet earlier. In a subsequent series of studies on the same species we found evidence that social position and related agonistic activity of males during the period of antler growth influence antler size and branching.
Changes in behaviour related to rank modified antler growth. For example, fallow deer bucks gaining higher rank through fighting other bucks exhibited enhanced growth of that part of the antler that was growing at that particular time. That substantially altered the entire antler growth. Understanding the relationship between rank, agonistic behaviour and hormone levels is crucial for the interpretation of previous results that showed a link between dominance rank and antler growth in deer.
Additional keywords: fallow deer, hierarchy, red deer.
References
[1] Bartoš L. Social status and antler development in red deer. In Bubenik GA, Bubenik AB, editors. Horns, pronghorns and antlers: evolution, morphology and social significance. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990. pp. 42–459.[2] Sempéré AJ, Boissin J. Neuroendocrine and endocrine control of the antler cycle in roe deer. In: Brown RD, editor. Antler development in Cervidae. Kingsville, TX: Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute; 1982. pp. 109–22.
[3] Bartoš L. The date of antler casting, age and social hierarchy relationships in the red deer stag. Behav Processes 1980; 5 293–301.
| The date of antler casting, age and social hierarchy relationships in the red deer stag.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Bubenik GA. Endocrine regulation of the antler cycle. In: Brown RD, editor. Antler Development in Cervidae. Kingsville, Texas: Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Reserve Institute; 1982. pp. 73–107.
[5] Goss RJ. Deer antlers: regeneration, function and evolution. New York, London, Paris, San Diego, San Francisco, Sao Paulo, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press; 1983.
[6] Bartoš L. Social activity and the antler cycle in red deer stags. In: Fennessy PF, Drew KR, editors. Biology of deer production. Wellington: The Royal Society of New Zealand; 1985. pp. 269–72.
[7] Bartoš L, Perner V. Integrity of a red deer stag social group during velvet period, association of individuals, and timing of antler cleaning. Behaviour 1985; 95 314–22.
| Integrity of a red deer stag social group during velvet period, association of individuals, and timing of antler cleaning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Bartoš L. Relationships between behaviour and antler cycle in red deer. Ethology 1986; 71 305–14.
| Relationships between behaviour and antler cycle in red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD. Red deer, behavior and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh: The University of Chicago Edinburgh University Press; 1982.
[10] Bartoš L. Dominance and aggression in various sized groups of red deer stags. Aggress Behav 1986; 12 175–82.
| Dominance and aggression in various sized groups of red deer stags.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Appleby MC. Social rank and food access in red deer stags. Behaviour 1980; 74 294–309.
| Social rank and food access in red deer stags.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Lincoln GA. The role of antlers in the behaviour of red deer. J Exp Zool 1972; 182 233–49.
| The role of antlers in the behaviour of red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Appleby MC. The probability of linearity hierarchies. Anim Behav 1983; 31 600–8.
| The probability of linearity hierarchies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Bartoš L, Hyánek J. Social position in the red deer stag II. The relationship with developed antlers. In: Brown RD, editor. Antler development in Cervidae. Kingsville, TX: Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute; 1982. pp. 463–6.
[15] Beninde J. Naturgeschichte des Rothirsches. Leipzig: P. Schops; 1937.
[16] Bubenik AB. The behavioral aspects of antlerogenesis. In: Brown RD, editor. Antler development in Cervidae. Kingsville, TX: Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute; 1982. pp. 389–449.
[17] Geist V. The evolution of the horn-like organs. Behaviour 1966; 27 175–214.
[18] Hediger H. Zur psychologischen Bedeutung des Hirschgeweihs. Verhandlungen der Schweizer Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, Zürich 1946; 126 162–3.
[19] Appleby MC. The consequences and causes of high social rank in red deer stags. Behaviour 1982; 80 259–73.
| The consequences and causes of high social rank in red deer stags.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Gibson RM, Guinness FE. The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Anim Behav 1979; 27 211–25.
| The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Lydekker R. The deer of all lands. London: Rowland Ward; 1898.
[22] Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD. The roaring of the red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 1979; 69 145–70.
| The roaring of the red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Bartoš L, Hyánek J. Social position in the red deer stag I. The effect on developing antlers. In: Brown RD, editor. Antler development in Cervidae. Kingsville, TX: Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute; 1982. pp. 451–61.
[24] Wölfel H. Zur Jugendentwicklung, Mutter-Kind-Bindung und Feindvermeidung beim Rothirsch (Cervus elaphus) I. Z Jagdwiss 1983; 29 143–62.
| Zur Jugendentwicklung, Mutter-Kind-Bindung und Feindvermeidung beim Rothirsch (Cervus elaphus) I.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Bartoš L, Perner V, Procházka B. On relationship between social rank during the velvet period and antler parameters in a growing red deer stag. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 1987; 32 403–12.
[26] Fennessy PF, Corson ID, Suttie JM, Littlejohn RP. Antler growth patterns in young red deer stags. In: Brown RD, editor. The biology of deer. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992. pp. 487–92.
[27] Muir PD, Sykes AR, Barrell GK. Growth and mineralisation of antlers in red deer (Cervus elaphus). N Z J Agric Res 1987; 30 305–15.
| 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXhvVChtrY%3D&md5=6bf06f1607b327ffd3b73ddb926e946eCAS |
[28] Rörig A. Das Wachstum des Geweihes von Cervus elaphus, Cervus barbarus und Cervus canadensis. Arch Entwicklungsmech Org 1906; 20 507–36.
| Das Wachstum des Geweihes von Cervus elaphus, Cervus barbarus und Cervus canadensis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Rörig A. Das Wachstum des Geweihes von Capreolus vulgaris. Arch Entwicklungsmech Org 1908; 25 423–30.
| Das Wachstum des Geweihes von Capreolus vulgaris.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Van Ballenberghe V. Growth and development of moose antlers in Alaska. In: Brown RD, editor. Antler development in Cervidae. Kingsville, TX: Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute; 1982. pp. 37–48.
[31] Jacobson HA, Griffin RN. Antler cycles of white-tailed deer in Mississippi. In Brown RD, editor. Antler development in Cervidae. Kingsville, TX: Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute; 1982. pp. 15–22.
[32] Bartoš L, Losos S. Response of antler growth to changing rank of fallow deer buck during the velvet period. Can J Zool 1997; 75 1934–9.
| Response of antler growth to changing rank of fallow deer buck during the velvet period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Bartoš L, Perner V, Losos S. Red deer stags rank position, body weight and antler growth. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 1988; 33 209–17.
[34] Clutton-Brock TH. The function of antlers. Behaviour 1982; 79 108–24.
| The function of antlers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Bartoš L, Schams D, Bubenik GA. Testosterone, but not IGF-1, LH, prolactin or cortisol, may serve as antler-stimulating hormone in red deer stags (Cervus elaphus). Bone 2009; 44 691–8.
| Testosterone, but not IGF-1, LH, prolactin or cortisol, may serve as antler-stimulating hormone in red deer stags (Cervus elaphus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19124089PubMed |
[36] Bartoš L, Schams D, Kierdorf U, Fischer K, Bubenik GA, Siler J, Losos S, Tomanek M, Lastovkova J. Cyproterone acetate reduced antler growth in surgically castrated fallow deer. J Endocrinol 2000; 164 87–95.
| Cyproterone acetate reduced antler growth in surgically castrated fallow deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10607941PubMed |
[37] Sapolsky RM. The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science 2005; 308 648–52.
| The influence of social hierarchy on primate health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjsFyku7w%3D&md5=be24aed8181700befc51c3d23a63988aCAS | 15860617PubMed |
[38] Sapolsky RM. Endocrine aspects of social instability in the olive baboon (Papio anubis). Am J Primatol 1983; 5 365–79.
| Endocrine aspects of social instability in the olive baboon (Papio anubis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXhtlehsbc%3D&md5=62f2cc94d038915325a1c203fa1d56c9CAS |
[39] Sapolsky RM. Testicular function, social rank and personality among wild baboons. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1991; 16 281–93.
| Testicular function, social rank and personality among wild baboons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK38XltFKnsA%3D%3D&md5=715db902c96f290af850229c32369ce9CAS | 1745697PubMed |
[40] Bartoš L, Miller KV, Osborn D. Relationship between dominance and antler cycle in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Acta Theriol (Warsz) 2004; 49 517–25.
| Relationship between dominance and antler cycle in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Bartoš L, Schams D, Bubenik GA, Kotrba R, Tománek M. Relationship between rank and plasma testosterone and cortisol in red deer males (Cervus elaphus). Physiol Behav 2010; 101 628–34.
| Relationship between rank and plasma testosterone and cortisol in red deer males (Cervus elaphus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20869973PubMed |
[42] Sands J, Creel S. Social dominance, aggression and faecal glucocorticoid levels in a wild population of wolves, Canis lupus. Anim Behav 2004; 67 387–96.
| Social dominance, aggression and faecal glucocorticoid levels in a wild population of wolves, Canis lupus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[43] Bartoš L, Bahbouh R, Vach M. Repeatability of size and fluctuating asymmetry of antler characteristics in red deer (Cervus elaphus) during ontogeny. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 2007; 91 215–26.
| Repeatability of size and fluctuating asymmetry of antler characteristics in red deer (Cervus elaphus) during ontogeny.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[44] Kruuk LEB, Slate J, Pemberton JM, Brotherstone S, Guinness F, Clutton-Brock T. Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 2002; 56 1683–95.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vpt1Cqsg%3D%3D&md5=2996412765399a4265087902aeac35b0CAS |
[45] Darwin C. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray; 1871.
[46] Ditchkoff SS, Lochmiller RL, Masters RE, Hoofer SR, Van Den Bussche RA. Major-histocompatibility-complex-associated variation in secondary sexual traits of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus): evidence for good-genes advertisement. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 2001; 55 616–25.
| Major-histocompatibility-complex-associated variation in secondary sexual traits of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus): evidence for good-genes advertisement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjsFSgt7g%3D&md5=cc3009004d94d827f01abc6a7cd733d2CAS |
[47] Geist V. Deer of the world: their evolution, behavior, and ecology. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books; 1998.
[48] Zahavi A. Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 1975; 53 205–14.
| Mate selection – a selection for a handicap.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE28%2Fntlygsg%3D%3D&md5=09ff1d8f7ce571c012fe97499055a149CAS | 1195756PubMed |
[49] Zahavi A. The cost of honesty. J Theor Biol 1977; 67 603–5.
| The cost of honesty.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE1c%2FgvV2gsw%3D%3D&md5=de72aafb9abfc1b848d0a67bdc8017daCAS | 904334PubMed |
[50] Malo AF, Roldan ERS, Garde J, Soler AJ, Gomendio M. Antlers honestly advertise sperm production and quality. Proc Biol Sci 2005; 272 149–57.
| Antlers honestly advertise sperm production and quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15695205PubMed |
