Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Influence of nutritional and socio-sexual cues upon reproductive efficiency of goats exposed to the male effect under extensive conditions

M. J. Flores-Najera A E , C. A. Meza-Herrera B , F. G. Echavarría A , E. Villagomez A , L. Iñiguez C , H. Salinas A and A. Gonzalez-Bulnes D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Calera, Zacatecas 98500, Mexico.

B Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas, Bermejillo, Durango 35230, México.

C International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria.

D Departamento de Reproducción, INIA, Madrid 28040, Spain.

E Corresponding author. Email: flores.manuel@inifap.gob.mx

Animal Production Science 50(9) 897-901 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10030
Submitted: 16 February 2010  Accepted: 3 July 2010   Published: 29 September 2010

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of nutritional supplementation and socio-sexual cues upon reproductive efficiency of goats exposed to the male effect under rangeland grazing conditions (22°N). Criollo goats (n = 73) were distributed in four experimental groups: (1) continuous males (CM, n = 19) in which males (n = 2) remained together with females from 7 March to 28 July; (2) supplemented males (SM, n = 16) in which males (n = 2) were kept separately and were individually supplemented with 18% crude protein and 2.77 Mcal ME kg–1 DM, during a 30-day period; (3) supplemented males exposed to the female effect (SM + FE, n = 19), in which supplemented males (n = 2) were maintained with females induced to oestrus before being used for male effect; and (4) supplemented males and supplemented females (SM + SF, n = 19) in which males (n = 2) were supplemented as in group SM, and females received the same supplementation as males 30 days before and 30 days after male introduction. Grazing was performed from 0900 to 1900 hours; liveweight (LW) was registered weekly before grazing and (or) supplementation. Ovarian activity was evaluated (serum P4 concentrations) in the four groups before and after male introduction. At the beginning of the study and supplementation, female LW did not differ among treatments (P > 0.01). However, during the supplementation phase, LW increased in a different fashion among groups (P < 0.002), favouring the SM, SM + FE and SM + SF groups. A positive correlation between female LW at the beginning of the rainy season and the onset of ovulatory activity was observed (r = +0.90; P < 0.01). The average date for the onset of ovarian activity differed (P < 0.001) among groups, being earlier in the SM + SF group (9 May ± 4.3 days), which also depicted the shortest interval between the introduction of males until the onset of ovulatory activity (P < 0.001). Results of the present study indicate that nutritional signalling of the reproductive activity of both female and male Criollo goats reared under marginal conditions surmounts the inhibitory effects of long-day photoperiods during the non-reproductive season. An increased level of nutrition during the anestrous season may be used to increase reproductive function of both male and female goats reared in harsh nutritional conditions and applied as a green, clean, and ethical reproductive tool at these latitudes.


Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge partial financial support of the International Collaborative Projects CONACYT-FOMIX-DURANGO: DGO-2008-C01-87559 and DGO-2009-C02-116746, funded by CONACYT, Mexico, as well as ALFA-III-ALAS, DCI-ALA/A9.09.01/08/19189/161-358/ALFA-III-82, supported by the European Union.


References


Chemineau P (1987) Possibilities for using bucks to stimulate ovarian and oestrous cycles in anovulatory goats – a review. Livestock Production Science 17, 135–147.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Chemineau P, Pellicer-Rubio MT, Lassoued N, Khaldi G, Monniaux D (2006) Male-induce short oestrous and ovarian cycles in sheep and goats: a working hypothesis. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 46, 417–429.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Chemineau O, Malpaux B, Brillard JP, Fostier A (2007) Seasonality of reproduction and production in farm fishes, birds and mammals. Animal 1, 419–432.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cruz-Castrejón U, Veliz FG, Rivas-Muñoz R, Flores JA, Hernández H, Duarte G (2007) Respuesta de la actividad sexual a la suplementación alimenticia de machos cabríos tratados con días largos, con un manejo extensivo a libre pastoreo. Técnica Pecuaria en México 45, 93–100. open url image1

Cushwa WT, Bradford GE, Stabenfeldt GH, Berger YM, Rally MR (1992) Ram influence on ovarian and sexual activity in anestrous ewes: effects of isolation of ewes from rams before joining and date of ram introduction. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1195–1200.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

De Santiago-Miramontes MA, Malpaux B, Delgadillo JA (2009) Body condition is associated with a shorter breeding Seaton and reduced ovulation rate in subtropical goats. Animal Reproduction Science 114, 175–182.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Delgadillo JA, Canedo GA, Chemineau P, Guillaeme D, Malpaux B (1999) Evidence for an annual reproductive rhythm independent of food availability in male creole goats in subtropical northern Mexico. Theriogenology 52, 727–737.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

FASS (1999) ‘Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in agricultural research and teaching.’ (Federation Animal Science Society: Savoy, IL)

Gamez-Vazquez HG, Rosales-Nieto CA, Bañuelos-Valenzuela R, Urrutia-Morales J, Diaz-Gomez MO, Silva-Ramos JM, Meza-Herrera CA (2008) Body condition score positively influence plasma leptin concentrations in criollo goats. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 7, 1237–1240. open url image1

Gelez H, Fabre-Nys C (2004) ‘The male effect’ in sheep and goats: a review of respective roles of the two olfactory systems. Hormones and Behavior 46, 257–271.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Guerra-García M, Meza-Herrera CA, Sanchez-Torres-Esqueda MT, Gallegos-Sanchez J, Torres-Hernandez G, Pro-Martonez A (2009) IGF-1 and ovarian activity of goats in divergent body condition and supplemented with non-degradable ruminal protein. Agrociencia 43, 241–247. open url image1

Juárez RAS, Montoya ER, Nevarez CG, Cerrillo MA, Mould FL (2004) In situ degradability of dry matter and neutral-detergent fibre of thorn scrubland forage consumed by goats in the semi-arid region of north Mexico. Animal Science 79, 505–511. open url image1

Little RC , Freund R , Spector JP (1991) ‘SAS system for linear models.’ 3rd edn. (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC)

Martin GB, Rodger J, Blache D (2004a) Nutritional and environmental effects on reproduction in small ruminants. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 16, 491–501.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Martin G, Milton J, Davidson R, Banchero Hunzicker G, Lindsay D, Blache D (2004b) Natural methods for increasing reproductive efficiency in small ruminants. Animal Reproduction Science 82–83, 231–245.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mellado M, Foote RH, Rodríguez A, Zarate P (1991) Botanical composition and nutrient of diets selected by goats grazing on desert grassland in Northern Mexico. Small Ruminant Research 6, 141–150.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mellado M, Valdez R, García JE (2004) Risk factors envolved in conceptions, abortion, and kidding rates of goats. Small Ruminant Research 55, 191–198.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Meza-Herrera CA, Sanchez SJM, Chavez-Perches JG, Salinas H, Mellado M (2004) Protein supplementation, body condition and ovarian activity in goats. Preovulatory serum profile of insulin. South African Journal of Animal Science 34(Suppl. 1), 223–226. open url image1

Meza-Herrera CA, Ross T, Hallford D, Hawkins D, Gonzalez-Bulnes A (2007) Effects of body condition and protein supplementation on LH secretion and luteal function in sheep. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42, 461–465.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Meza-Herrera CA, Hallford DM, Ortiz JA, Cuevas RA, Sanchez JM, Salinas H, Mellado M, Gonzalez-Bulnes A (2008) Body condition and protein supplementation positively affect periovulatory ovarian activity by non-LH mediated pathways in goats. Animal Reproduction Science 106, 412–420.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Meza-Herrera CA, Veliz-Deras FG, Wurzinger M, Lopez-Ariza B, Arellano-Rodriguez G, Rodriguez-Martinez R (2010a) The kiss-1, kisspeptin, gpr-54 complex: a critical modulator of GnRH neurons during pubertal activation. Journal of Applied Biomedicine 8, 1–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Meza-Herrera CA, Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Kridli R, Mellado M, Arechiga-Flores CF, Salinas H, Luginbhul JM (2010b) Neuroendocrine, metabolic and genomic cues signaling the onset of puberty in females. Reproduction in Domestic Animals in press. ,
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Morris TR (1999) ‘Experimental designs and analyses in animal sciences.’ (CABI Publishing: New York)

Scaramuzzi R, Campbell BK, Downing JA, Kendall NR, Khalid M, Muñoz-Gutierrez M, Somchit A (2006) A review of the effects of supplementary nutrition in the ewe on the concentration of reproductive and metabolic hormones and the mechanisms that regulate folliculogenesis and ovulation rate. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 46, 339–354.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Scott LK, Malechek J (1997) Relationships between nutrition and foraging behavior of free-ranging sheep and goats. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1756–1763.
PubMed |
open url image1

Stafford SD, Cochran RC, Vanzant ES, Fritz JO (1996) Evaluation of the potential of supplements to substitute for low-quality, tallgrass-prairie forage. Journal of Animal Science 74, 639–647.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Thiery JC, Malpaux B (2003) Seasonal regulation of reproductive activity in sheep: modulation of access of sex steroids to the brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1007, 169–175.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Valencia J, González JL, Díaz J (1986) Reproductive activity of the criollo goat in Mexico by means of postmortem genital examination. Veterinaria (México) 17, 177–189. open url image1

Veliz FG, Moreno S, Duarte G, Vielma J, Chemineau P, Poindron P, Malpaux B, Delgadillo JA (2002) Male effect in seasonally anovulatory lactating goats depends on the presence of sexually active bucks, but no estrous females. Animal Reproduction Science 72, 197–207.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Walkden-Brown SW, Restall BJ, Henniawatti H (1993) The male effect in the Australian cashmere goats. 3. Enhancement with buck nutrition and use of oestrous females. Animal Reproduction Science 32, 69–84.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zarazaga LA, Guzmán JL, Dominguez C, Pérez MC, Prieto R (2005) Effect of plane of nutrition on seasonality of reproduction in Spanish Papoya goats. Animal Reproduction Science 87, 253–267.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1