Calculation of lifetime net income per year (LTNI/year) of Australian Holstein cows to validate the Australian profit ranking of their sires. 1. Genetic analyses and prediction of LTNI/year for cows still in the herd
M. Haile-Mariam A C , P. J. Bowman A and M. E. Goddard A BA Biosciences Research Division, Department of Primary Industries, La Trobe R&D Park, 1 Park Drive, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.
B Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: mekonnen.hailemariam@dpi.vic.gov.au
Animal Production Science 50(8) 757-766 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09234
Submitted: 30 December 2009 Accepted: 8 June 2010 Published: 31 August 2010
Abstract
Birth, calving, milk yield, somatic cell count (SCC) and culling data of 274 000 AI-bred Holstein Friesian cows that were born between 1990 and 1998 from ~3400 herds were used to calculate lifetime net income per cow per year (LTNI/year). The main objective of this study was to identify an early measure of LTNI/year so that data of cows that are still in the herd can be used for predicting LTNI/year of cows. LTNI/year of cows that are still in the herd was predicted from net income per year (NI/year) assuming cows are culled at the end of each lactation and other traits that are measured early in the life of cows. LTNI/year is defined as NI up to the end of parity 9 or culling or death of cows per year of productive life.
On average maximum LTNI/year was attained by cows that completed seven lactations and LTNI/year of cows was the lowest if cows completed only one lactation. For cows that at least survived to second lactation LTNI/year increased with their NI/year at the end of the first parity and their relative production compared with their herdmates but decreased with the increase in average lactation SCC. The heritability of LTNI/year was 0.09 and had a genetic and residual correlation of 0.62 and 0.71, respectively, with productive life. The genetic correlation of LTNI/year with first-parity lactation protein and fat yield was high (~0.7 or above) but near zero with calving interval and lactation SCC. The genetic correlations between LTNI/year and NI/year up to the end of parity 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 0.84, 0.96, 0.99 and 1.0, respectively. The corresponding residual correlations were 0.55, 0.89, 0.96 and 0.98.
The genetic correlation between actual and predicted LTNI/year based only on cows that did not complete their lifetime (cows still in the herd) were 0.93, 0.96, 0.98 and 0.99 by the end of the first, second, third and fourth parity, respectively. The corresponding residual correlations were lower at 0.54, 0.70, 0.80 and 0.86, respectively. Estimates of genetic correlations between LTNI/year and NI/year based on calvings that happened 1 (1.0) to 4 (0.98) years earlier were unity. The corresponding residual correlations were slightly lower at 0.92 if the calvings that occurred 4 years ago and before were used, and near unity (0.98) if calvings that happened 1 year ago and before were used. In conclusion, the high genetic correlation (0.9 or above) between LTNI/year of cows and measures of lifetime NI/year based on cows that had a shorter opportunity to complete their lifetime suggests that genetic evaluation for LTNI/year is feasible even if some of the cows have incomplete lifetime data.
Acknowledgements
This research is funded by Dairy Australia and the Victorian Department of Primary Industries. We thank ADHIS for providing the data. The authors also thank Dr Jennie Pryce of DPI Victoria and Rod Dyson of Countdown Downunder for fruitful discussion.
Beaudry F,
Cassell BG,
Norman HD, Pearson RE
(1988) Impact of prices on profit functions in Dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 485–491.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cassell BG,
Jobst SM,
McGilliard ML, Pearson RE
(2002) Evaluating sire selection practices using lifetime net income functions. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 3492–3502.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
de Haas Y,
Veerkamp RF,
Barkema HW,
Gröhn YT, Schukken YH
(2004) Associations between pathogen-specific cases of clinical mastitis and somatic cell count patterns. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 95–105.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Dommerholt J, Wilmink JBM
(1986) Optimal selection responses under varying milk prices and margins for milk production. Livestock Production Science 14, 109–121.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goddard ME
(1998) Consensus and debate in the definition of breeding objectives. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 6–18.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Haile-Mariam M,
Bowman PJ, Goddard ME
(2003) Genetic and environmental relationship among calving interval, survival, persistency of milk yield and somatic cell count in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 80, 189–200.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haile-Mariam M,
Bowman PJ, Goddard ME
(2010) Calculation of lifetime net income per year (LTNI/year) of Australian Holstein cows to validate the Australian profit ranking of their sires 2. Validation of the Australian profit ranking of sires and test for genotype by environment interaction based on LTNI/year. Animal Production Science 50, 767–774.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hazel LE,
Dickerson GE, Freeman AE
(1994) The selection index – then, now and for the future. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 3236–3251.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Jairath L,
Dekkers JCM,
Schaeffer LR,
Liu Z,
Burnside EB, Kolstad B
(1998) Genetic evaluation for herd life in Canada. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 550–562.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Meuwissen THE, Goddard ME
(1997) Selection of farm animals for non-linear traits and profit. Animal Science (Penicuik, Scotland) 65, 1–8.
Nettle R,
Paine M, Penry J
(2010) Aligning farm decision making and genetic information systems to improve animal production: methodology and findings from the Australian dairy industry. Animal Production Science 50, 429–434.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pérez-Cabal MA, Alenda R
(2003) Lifetime profit as an individual trait and prediction of its breeding values in Spanish Holstein Cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 4115–4122.
| Crossref |
PubMed |
Rauw WM,
Kanis E,
Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Grommers FJ
(1998) Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56, 15–33.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith LA,
Cassell BG, Pearson RE
(1998) The effects of inbreeding on the lifetime performance of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2729–2737.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Van Arendonk JAM
(1985) Studies on the replacement policies in dairy cattle. II. Optimum policy and influence of changes in production and prices. Livestock Production Science 13, 101–121.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Visscher PM, Goddard ME
(1995) Genetic analyses of profit for Australian dairy cattle. Animal Science 61, 9–18.
Visscher PM,
Bowman PJ, Goddard ME
(1994) Breeding objectives for pasture based dairy production systems. Livestock Production Science 40, 123–137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
