Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Dust emissions from a tunnel-ventilated broiler poultry shed with fresh and partially reused litter

Robin L. Modini A , Victoria Agranovski A C , N. K. Meyer A D , Erin Gallagher B , Mark Dunlop B and Zoran D. Ristovski A E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia.

B Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

C Present address: Department of Environment and Resource Management, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia.

D Present address: Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.

E Corresponding author. Email: z.ristovski@qut.edu.au

Animal Production Science 50(6) 552-556 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09207
Submitted: 15 December 2009  Accepted: 25 February 2010   Published: 11 June 2010

Abstract

Dust emissions from large-scale, tunnel-ventilated poultry sheds could have negative health and environmental impacts. Despite this fact, the literature concerning dust emissions from tunnel-ventilated poultry sheds in Australia and overseas is relatively scarce. Dust measurements were conducted during two consecutive production cycles at a single broiler shed on a poultry farm near Ipswich, Queensland. Fresh litter was employed during the first cycle and partially reused litter was employed during the second cycle. This provided an opportunity to study the effect that partial litter reuse has on dust emissions. Dust levels were characterised by the number concentration of suspended particles having a diameter between 0.5 and 20 μm and by the mass concentration of dust particles of less than 10 μm diameter (PM10) and 2.5 μm diameter (PM2.5). In addition, we measured the number size distributions of dust particles. The average concentration and emission rate of dust was higher when partially reused litter was used in the shed than when fresh litter was used. In addition, we found that dust particles emitted from the shed with partially reused litter were finer than the particles emitted with fresh litter. Although the change in litter properties is certainly contributing to this observed variability, other factors such as ventilation rate and litter moisture content are also likely to be involved.


Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Australian Poultry Cooperative Research Centre for providing funding and the integrators, owners, managers and employees of the poultry farm for access to their facilities, production data and industry knowledge.


References


Banhazi T , Laffrique M , Seedorf J , Cargill C (2003) Reduction of dust emissions from broiler and caged layer sheds. Rural Industries Research and Development Organisation, RIRDC Project No. SAR-33J, Barton, ACT.

Blackall PJ , Chinivasagam HN , Ristovski Z (2008) Evaluating risks posed by pathogen and dust emissions from meat chicken sheds. Rural Industries Research and Development Organisation, RIRDC Project No. DAQ-318A, Barton, ACT.

Cai L, Koziel JA, Lo Y-C, Hoff SJ (2006) Characterisation of volatile organic compounds and odorants associated with swine barn particulate matter using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry–olfactometry. Journal of Chromatography. A 1102, 60–72.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Das KC , Kastner JR , Hassan SM (2004) Potential of particulate matter as a pathway for odor dispersion. In ‘ASAE/CSAE annual international meeting’, Ontario, Canada. (ASAE)

Fabbri C, Valli L, Guarino M, Costa A, Mazzotta V (2007) Ammonia, methane, nitrous oxide and particulate matter emissions from two different buildings for laying hens. Biosystems Engineering 97, 441–455.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hammond EG, Fedler C, Smith RJ (1981) Analysis of particle-borne swine house odors. Agriculture and Environment 6, 395–401.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Heber AJ, Stroik M, Faubion JM, Willard LH (1988) Size distribution and identification of aerial dust particles in swine finishing buildings. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 31, 882–887. open url image1

Oehrl LL, Keener KM, Bottcher RW, Munilla RD, Connelly KM (2001) Characterisation of odor components from swine housing dust using gas chromatography. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 17, 659–661. open url image1

Pollock T , Anderson S (2004) Review of modelling, emission measurement and treatment of odour and dust emissions from broiler farms. Australian Poultry CRC Project 03-29, Armidale, NSW.

Pope CA, Dockery DW, Schwartz J (1995) Review of epidemiological evidence of health effects of particulate air pollution. Inhalation Toxicology 7, 1–18.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Redwine JS, Lacey RE, Mukhtar S, Carey JB (2002) Concentration and emissions of ammonia and particulate matter in tunnel-ventilated broiler houses under summer conditions in Texas. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 45, 1101–1109.
CAS |
open url image1

Standards Australia (1995 a) ‘Australian standard: stationary source emissions: selection of sampling positions (AS4323.1-1995).’ (Standards Australia International: Sydney)

Standards Australia (1995 b) ‘Australian/New Zealand standard: stationary source emissions: determination of total particulate matter – Isokinetic sampling – Gravimetric method (AS4323.2).’ (Standards Australia International: Sydney)

Visser MC, Fairchild B, Czarick M, Lacy M, Worley J, Thompson S, Kastner J, Ritz C, Naeher LP (2006) Fine particle measurements inside and outside tunnel-ventilated broiler houses. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 15, 394–405. open url image1

WHO (2003) Health aspects of air pollution with particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide: report on a World Health Organization working group. Bonn, Germany.