Urine distribution and grazing behaviour of female sheep and cattle grazing a steep New Zealand hill pasture
Keith Betteridge A E , Des Costall A , Sophie Balladur B , Martin Upsdell C and Kazuhiro Umemura DA AgResearch Grasslands, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
B Institut National Agronomique de Paris-Grignon, AgroParisTech, Paris, France.
C AgResearch Ruakura, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
D National Agricultural Research Centre for Hokkaido Region, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo, Japan.
E Corresponding author. Email: keith.betteridge@agresearch.co.nz
Animal Production Science 50(6) 624-629 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09201
Submitted: 14 December 2009 Accepted: 14 April 2010 Published: 11 June 2010
Abstract
Much of the nitrogen (N) excreted by grazing animals is within highly concentrated urine patches. The N that is not used by plants is likely to be lost through leaching, emitted as N gases or added to the soil organic N pool. The present study used custom-made global positioning system (GPS) and urine sensors on 20 non-lactating ewes and 20 non-lactating beef heifers grazing steep hill country to determine potential critical source areas for N loss to the environment. Bite counters on four sheep and five heifers showed when and where animals were eating. Animals were monitored simultaneously on 0.5 ha adjacent paddocks over 8 days. Sheep and cows urinated a mean (±s.d.) of 21.2 ± 6.1 and 9.0 ± 3.0 times/day, respectively. Eating started soon after sunrise and increased during the day to reach a maximum in the hour before sunset, after which the eating activity of both species was near zero for most of the night, except for a short feeding period at around 0300 hours. The urination frequency of sheep increased as eating activity increased during the day, but this relationship was not seen in heifers. Land classified as easy hill country (≤12°) comprised 31% of the sheep paddock and contained 23% of the urination events. In contrast, although the easy hill country comprised 33% of the cattle paddock, 46% of the urine patches were in this area. Although aerial application of N mitigation products to whole paddocks or farms is uneconomic, the results of the present study suggest that mitigation products could possibly be cost-effectively targeted to easy contoured, cattle-grazed hill country areas accessible by farm vehicle.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank John Napier, Jodi Allan and Bradley Gordon for assistance with farm work and animal handling. This project was funded by The Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (contract C10X315).
Betteridge K,
Andrewes WGK, Sedcole JR
(1986) Intake and excretion of nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus by grazing steers. Journal of Agricultural Science 106, 393–404.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified 10 May 2010]
Betteridge K,
Hoogendoorn C,
Costall D,
Carter M, Griffiths W
(2010) Sensors for detecting and logging spatial distribution of urine from grazing female cattle and sheep. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture in press. ,
[Verified 10 May 2010]
Gibb MJ,
Huckle CA,
Nuthall R, Rook AJ
(1998) The effects of physiological state (lactating or dry) and sward height on grazing behaviour and intake by dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 269–287.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified 10 May 2010]
Haynes RJ, Williams PH
(1993) Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem. Advances in Agronomy 49, 119–199.
|
CAS |
Crossref |
[Verified 10 May 2010]
Orr RJ,
Penning PD,
Parsons AJ, Champion RA
(1995) Herbage intake and N excretion by sheep grazing monoculture or a mixture of grass and white clover. Grass and Forage Science 50, 31–40.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Orr RJ,
Rutter SM,
Penning PD, Rook AJ
(2001) Matching grass supply to grazing patterns for dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 56, 352–361.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Parfitt RL,
Mackay AD,
Ross DJ, Budding PJ
(2009) Effects of soil fertility on leaching losses of N, P and C in hill country. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 69–80.
|
CAS |
Pleasants AB,
Shorten PR, Wake GC
(2007) The distribution of urine deposited on a pasture from grazing animals. Journal of Agricultural Science 145, 81–86.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ruz-Jerez B,
White R, Ball P
(1995) A comparison of nitrate leaching under clover-based pastures and nitrogen-fertilised grass by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science 125, 361–369.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Saggar S,
Mackay AD,
Hedley MJ,
Lambert MG, Clark DA
(1990) A nutrient-transfer model to explain the fate of phosphorus and sulphur in a grazed hill-country pasture. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 30, 295–315.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Trevaskis LM,
Fulkerson WJ, Nandra KS
(2004) Effect of time of feeding carbohydrate supplements and pasture on production of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 85, 275–285.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Umemura K,
Wanaka T, Ueno T
(2009) Technical note: estimation of feed intake while grazing using a wireless system requiring no halter. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 996–1000.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Upsdell MP
(1994) Bayesian smoothers as an extension of nonlinear regression. The New Zealand Statistician 29, 66–81.
White SL,
Sheffield RE,
Washburn SP,
King LD, Green JT
(2001) Spatial and time distribution of dairy cattle excreta in an intensive pasture system. Journal of Environmental Quality 30, 2180–2187.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
