Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Intake, retention time in the rumen and microbial protein production of Bos indicus steers consuming grasses varying in crude protein content

T. Panjaitan A B , S. P. Quigley A , S. R. McLennan C , T. Swain C and D. P. Poppi A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Schools of Animal Studies and Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.

B Present address: Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia.

C Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Yeerongpilly, Qld 4105, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: d.poppi@uq.edu.au

Animal Production Science 50(6) 444-448 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09197
Submitted: 11 December 2009  Accepted: 16 March 2010   Published: 11 June 2010

Abstract

Feed intake, rumen function, microbial protein (MCP) production and the efficiency of MCP production were determined in steers fed four different forage hays varying markedly in crude protein content. Low quality tropical forage (speargrass and Mitchell grass) hays had lower crude protein content, higher neutral detergent fibre content and lower digestibility than a medium quality tropical forage (pangola grass) hay and a temperate forage (ryegrass) hay. Steers fed speargrass and Mitchell grass hays had lower MCP production (80 and 170 g MCP/day, respectively) and efficiency of MCP production [78 and 79 g MCP/kg digestible organic matter (DOM), respectively] than steers fed pangola grass (328 g MCP/day; 102 g MCP/kg DOM) and ryegrass (627 g MCP/day; 135 g MCP/kg DOM) hays, which was directly related to the supply of DOM and rumen degradable protein. Intake was greatest for ryegrass hay, followed by pangola grass, Mitchell grass and speargrass hays [17.6, 15.6, 10.1 and 5.5 g DM/kg W.day, respectively]. The retention time of DM in the rumen was 72.1, 47.7, 28.6 and 19.1 h for speargrass, Mitchell grass, pangola grass and ryegrass hays, respectively, with a similar trend apparent for the retention time of neutral detergent fibre, lignin, chromium-EDTA and ytterbium labelled digesta. The difference in the protein : energy ratio of absorbed substrates (measured as efficiency of MCP production) did not appear to account for all the differences in intake, nor did a purely physical mechanism.


Acknowledgements

The skilled technical assistance of P. Isherwood, A. Gibbon, L. Gardiner, M. Halliday and J. Kidd is appreciated. This work was funded by Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA) and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). T. Panjaitan was in receipt of a John Allwright Fellowship from ACIAR.


References


Balcells J, Parker DS, Guada JA, Piero JM (1992) Simultaneous analysis of allantoin and oxypurines in biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography Biomedical Applications 575, 153–157.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Bowen M, Poppi DP, McLennan SR, Doogan VJ (2006) A comparison of the excretion rate of endogenous purine derivatives in the urine of Bos indicus and Bos taurus steers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 173–177.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Cruickshank GJ, Poppi DP, Sykes AR (1992) The intake, digestion and protein degradation of grazed herbage by early weaned lambs The British Journal of Nutrition 68, 349–364.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

de Vega A, Poppi DP (1997) Extent of digestion and rumen condition as factors affecting passage of liquid and digesta particles in sheep. The Journal of Agricultural Science 128, 207–215.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dijkstra J, France J, Davies DR (1998) Different mathematical approaches to estimating microbial protein supply in ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 3370–3384.
CAS | Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Egan AR (1977) Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. VIII. Relationship between the voluntary intake of herbage by sheep and the protein/energy ratio in the digestion product. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 907–915.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Freer M , Dove H , Nolan J (Eds) (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Hunter RA, Siebert BD (1987) The effect of supplements of rumen-degradable protein and formaldehyde-treated casein on the intake of low-nitrogen roughages by Bos taurus and Bos indicus steers at different stages of maturity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 209–218.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

McLennan SR , Kidd JF , Hendrickson RE , Jeffrey M , Poppi DP , Martin PM (1997) Seasonal changes in the degradability of protein in a tropical grass pasture. In ‘Recent advances in animal nutrition in Australia’. (Eds JL Corbett, M Choct, JV Nolan, JB Rowe) p. 252. (University of New England: Armidale)

Poppi DP, Minson DJ, Ternouth JH (1981) Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fraction of grasses. I. The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time in the reticulo-rumen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 99–108.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Satter LD, Slyter LL (1974) Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. The British Journal of Nutrition 32, 199–208.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Thornton RF, Minson DJ (1973) The relationship between apparent retention time in the rumen, voluntary intake and apparent digestibility of legume and grass diets in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 889–898.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Weston RH (1996) Some aspects of constraint to forage consumption by ruminants. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 175–197.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1