Undertaking participatory research at a national scale: the Biodiversity in Grain & Graze approach
K. L. Bridle A C and R. J. Price BA Grain & Graze National Biodiversity Coordinator, Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 98, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
B Grain & Graze National Coordinator, Kiri-ganai Research, GPO Box 103, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: kerry.bridle@utas.edu.au
Animal Production Science 49(10) 916-927 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09007
Submitted: 13 January 2009 Accepted: 8 April 2009 Published: 16 September 2009
Abstract
Limited information is available on the management and delivery of national-scale biodiversity projects. Even less information is available on such projects operating in agricultural matrices, particularly how they address the expectations of multiple stakeholders from paddock to farm, regional and national scales. This paper describes the approach taken to implement and deliver the Biodiversity in Grain & Graze project, which was national in focus, regional in operation and local in delivery. The project was instigated by four research and development corporation partners who were keen to connect the interests of mixed-farming producers to the environmental goals of nine collaborating regions across Australia. One aim of the project was to engage producers in participatory research on the biodiversity values of mixed-farming systems. This aim could not have been met without considerable effort building regional capacity in biodiversity research and developing a national network of researchers, regional extension staff and stakeholders. This national network was engaged primarily through program and project workshops, regular electronic communications and site visits. Levels of engagement were high, resulting in a sense of ownership by all stakeholders, counteracting to some degree the ill feeling associated with the late inclusion of the biodiversity project to regional activities. Issues relating to goal confusion were evident throughout the whole project, despite a concerted effort by the project team to address such tensions. Previous studies have indicated, and we concur, that biodiversity components need to be built into programs like Grain & Graze at the beginning, and need to be developed in consultation with farmers, regional agencies and research organisations to ensure that expectations are shared and the project is fully supported.
Additional keywords: extension, farming systems.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks go to all who participated in BiGG throughout the life of the project. Thank you also to Gill Stewart, Ted Lefroy, Jann Wiliams, Jim Scott and Ron Hacker for their contributions to this paper.
Andrew J
(2003) Key features of the regional producer network for enabling social learning. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 1015–1029.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified 5 December 2008]
Bridle K,
Fitzgerald M,
Green D,
Smith J,
McQuillan P, Lefroy T
(2009) Relationships between site characteristics, farming system and biodiversity on Australian mixed farms. Animal Production Science 49, 869–882.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified 5 December 2008]
James S
(2002) Bridging the gap between private landholders and conservationists. Conservation Biology 16, 269–271.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified 27 November 2008]
Mason W,
Lamb K, Russell B
(2003) The Sustainable Grazing Systems Program: new solutions for livestock producers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 663–672.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified
5 December 2008]
McCown RN
(2001) Learning to bridge the gap between the science-based decision support and the practice of farming: evolution in paradigms of model-based research and intervention from design to dialogue. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 549–571.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nicholson C,
Barr N,
Kentish A,
Dowling PM,
McCormick LH,
Palmer M,
Simpson I,
Simpson K, Walsh J
(2003) A research-extension model for encouraging the adoption of productive and sustainable practice in high rainfall grazing areas. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 685–694.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Price RJ
(2003) Identifying social spaces in the Sustainable Grazing Systems Program. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 1041–1059.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Price RJ, Hacker RB
(2009) Grain & Graze: an innovative triple bottom line approach to collaborative and multidisciplinary mixed-farming systems research, development and extension. Animal Production Science 49, 729–735.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Price RJ,
Nicholson C, McGuckian N
(2009) Contesting targets as a measurement of success in agricultural extension: a case study of the Grain & Graze Change-on-farm strategy. Animal Production Science 49, 941–955.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams J
(2007) Linking science and practice: the pros and cons of the participatory research model. Ecological Management & Restoration 8, 158–159.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |