Using microchip-reading antennas to passively monitor a mammal reintroduction in south-west Queensland
Cassandra M. Arkinstall
A * , Sean I. FitzGibbon A , Kevin J. Bradley B , Katherine E. Moseby C and Peter J. Murray D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia.
B Save the Bilby Fund, Charleville, Qld, Australia.
C Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
D School of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia.
Australian Mammalogy 45(1) 98-107 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM22005
Submitted: 26 January 2022 Accepted: 28 July 2022 Published: 18 August 2022
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Mammal Society.
Abstract
Microchip-reading devices provide an inexpensive and efficient means of passively detecting and monitoring wildlife reintroductions, particularly where intensive methods such as trapping and radio-tracking may be difficult or pose risk to animal welfare. We trialled the use of microchip-reading antennas for post-release monitoring of the survival of bilbies (Macrotis lagotis) for a reintroduction in south-west Queensland. The antennas detected 76% of the released captive-born bilbies (all microchipped) and 30% of the microchipped wild-born bilbies during the study period. Overall, the microchip-reading antennas greatly improved the rate of detection for bilbies in the enclosure compared to cage trapping alone. Of the 42 bilbies that were microchipped and had the potential to be recaptured in traps or detected on microchip readers, 33 were recorded from the combined approaches, with 20 bilbies recaptured in traps and 29 bilbies detected on the microchip readers. Antenna location/placement should be carefully considered in the context of the target species’ home range size as it may affect the probability of animals encountering the antenna. Here we demonstrate the ability to use these microchip-reading antennas to passively monitor post-release survival in a remote location, just one of many potential applications for these devices in wildlife management and conservation.
Keywords: bilby, Macrotis lagotis, marsupial, microchip-reading device, passive monitoring, reintroduction biology, survival, wildlife monitoring.
References
Armstrong, D. P., Moro, D., Hayward, M. W., and Seddon, P. J. (2015). Introduction: the development of reintroduction biology in New Zealand and Australia. In ‘Advances in reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand fauna’. (Eds D. P. Armstrong, M. W. Hayward, D. Moro, and P. J. Seddon) pp. 1–6. (CSIRO Publishing: Victoria.)Block, W. M., Franklin, A. B., Ward, J. P., Ganey, J. L., and White, G. C. (2001). Design and Implementation of Monitoring Studies to Evaluate the Success of Ecological Restoration on Wildlife. Restoration Ecology 9, 293–303.
| Design and Implementation of Monitoring Studies to Evaluate the Success of Ecological Restoration on Wildlife.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Briggs, A. J. A., Robstad, C. A., and Rosell, F. (2021). Using Radio‐Frequency Identification Technology to Monitor Eurasian Beavers. Wildlife Society Bulletin 45, 154–161.
| Using Radio‐Frequency Identification Technology to Monitor Eurasian Beavers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Catling, P. C., Burt, R. J., and Kooyman, R. (1997). A Comparison of Techniques Used in a Survey of the Ground-dwelling and Arboreal Mammals in Forests in North-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 24, 417.
| A Comparison of Techniques Used in a Survey of the Ground-dwelling and Arboreal Mammals in Forests in North-eastern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chetouane, F. (2015). An Overview on RFID Technology Instruction and Application. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48, 382–387.
| An Overview on RFID Technology Instruction and Application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coetsee, A., Harley, D., Lynch, M., Coulson, G., de Milliano, J., Cooper, M., and Groenewegen, R. (2016). Radio-transmitter attachment methods for monitoring the endangered eastern barred bandicoot (Perameles gunnii). Australian Mammalogy 38, 221–231.
| Radio-transmitter attachment methods for monitoring the endangered eastern barred bandicoot (Perameles gunnii).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Commonwealth of Australia (2019). ‘Recovery Plan for the Greater Bilby (Macrotis lagotis) - DRAFT.’ (Canberra, Australia.) Available at https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threatened/recovery-plans/comment/draft-recovery-plan-greater-bilby
De Bondi, N., White, J. G., Stevens, M., and Cooke, R. (2010). A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities. Wildlife Research 37, 456.
| A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dennis, T. E., and Shah, S. F. (2012). Assessing acute effects of trapping, handling, and tagging on the behavior of wildlife using GPS telemetry: a case study of the common brushtail possum. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 15, 189–207.
| Assessing acute effects of trapping, handling, and tagging on the behavior of wildlife using GPS telemetry: a case study of the common brushtail possum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Edwards, M. C., Hoy, J. M., FitzGibbon, S., and Murray, P. J. (2019). Training a wild-born marsupial to use microchip-automated devices: the brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) as proof of concept. Australian Mammalogy 41, 279–282.
| Training a wild-born marsupial to use microchip-automated devices: the brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) as proof of concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Edwards, M. C., Hoy, J. M., FitzGibbon, S. I., and Murray, P. J. (2020a). Bandicoot bunkers: training wild-caught northern brown bandicoots (Isoodon macrourus) to use microchip-automated safe refuge. Wildlife Research 47, 239–243.
| Bandicoot bunkers: training wild-caught northern brown bandicoots (Isoodon macrourus) to use microchip-automated safe refuge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Edwards, M. C., Hoy, J. M., FitzGibbon, S. I., and Murray, P. J. (2020b). Monitoring with microchips: Microchip‐automated doors as a potential novel method for tracking the survival of released Northern Brown Bandicoots. Ecological Management & Restoration 21, 254–256.
| Monitoring with microchips: Microchip‐automated doors as a potential novel method for tracking the survival of released Northern Brown Bandicoots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Efford, M. G., and Hunter, C. M. (2018). Spatial capture-mark-resight estimation of animal population density. Biometrics 74, 411–420.
| Spatial capture-mark-resight estimation of animal population density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer, J., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2000). An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation 96, 1–11.
| An assessment of the published results of animal relocations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garden, J. G., McAlpine, C. A., Possingham, H. P., and Jones, D. N. (2007). Using multiple survey methods to detect terrestrial reptiles and mammals: what are the most successful and cost-efficient combinations? Wildlife Research 34, 218.
| Using multiple survey methods to detect terrestrial reptiles and mammals: what are the most successful and cost-efficient combinations?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hanmer, H. J., Thomas, R. L., and Fellowes, M. D. E. (2017). Provision of supplementary food for wild birds may increase the risk of local nest predation. Ibis 159, 158–167.
| Provision of supplementary food for wild birds may increase the risk of local nest predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kalafut, K. L., and Kinley, R. (2020). Using radio frequency identification for behavioral monitoring in little blue penguins. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 23, 62–73.
| Using radio frequency identification for behavioral monitoring in little blue penguins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kleemann, S., Sandow, D., Stevens, M., Schultz, D. J., Taggart, D. A., and Croxford, A. (2022). Non-invasive monitoring and reintroduction biology of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby. Australian Journal of Zoology 69, 41–54.
| Non-invasive monitoring and reintroduction biology of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laurance, W. F. (1992). Abundance estimates of small mammals in Australian tropical rainforest: a comparison of four trapping methods. Wildlife Research 19, 651.
| Abundance estimates of small mammals in Australian tropical rainforest: a comparison of four trapping methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Macgregor, J. W., Holyoake, C. S., Munks, S., Connolly, J. H., Robertson, I. D., Fleming, P. A., and Warren, K. S. (2014). Novel use of in-stream microchip readers to monitor wild platypuses. Pacific Conservation Biology 20, 376–384.
| Novel use of in-stream microchip readers to monitor wild platypuses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Martin, S. W., Mellinger, D. K., Ward, J. A., Moretti, D. J., Harris, D., and Tyack, P. L. (2013). Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics. Biological Reviews 88, 287–309.
| Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moseby, K. E., and O’Donnell, E. (2003). Reintroduction of the greater bilby, Macrotis lagotis (Reid) (Marsupialia: Thylacomyidae), to northern South Australia: survival, ecology and notes on reintroduction protocols. Wildlife Research 30, 15–27.
| Reintroduction of the greater bilby, Macrotis lagotis (Reid) (Marsupialia: Thylacomyidae), to northern South Australia: survival, ecology and notes on reintroduction protocols.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Simons, T. R., Farnsworth, G. L., Bailey, L. L., and Sauer, J. R. (2002). Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis. Environmetrics 13, 105–119.
| Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2021). ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.1.0.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.)
Rafiq, K., Appleby, R. G., Edgar, J. P., Radford, C., Smith, B. P., Jordan, N. R., Dexter, C. E., Jones, D. N., Blacker, A. R. F., and Cochrane, M. (2021). WildWID: An open‐source active RFID system for wildlife research. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12, 1580–1587.
| WildWID: An open‐source active RFID system for wildlife research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Resende, P. S., Viana-Junior, A. B., Young, R. J., and Azevedo, C. S. d. (2020). A global review of animal translocation programs. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 43.2, 221–232.
| A global review of animal translocation programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Selva, N., Berezowska-Cnota, T., and Elguero-Claramunt, I. (2014). Unforeseen effects of supplementary feeding: ungulate baiting sites as hotspots for ground-nest predation. PLoS One 9, e90740.
| Unforeseen effects of supplementary feeding: ungulate baiting sites as hotspots for ground-nest predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Short, J. (2009). ‘The characteristics and success of vertebrate translocations within Australia: a progress report for Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.’ (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Kalamunda, Western Australia, Australia.)
Short, J., Bradshaw, S. D., Giles, J., Prince, R. I. T., and Wilson, G. R. (1992). Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupialia: Macropodoidea) in Australia—A review. Biological Conservation 62, 189–204.
| Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupialia: Macropodoidea) in Australia—A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thierry, A. M., De Bouillane De Lacoste, N., Ulvund, K., Andersen, R., MeÅs, R., Eide, N. E., and Landa, A. (2020). Use of Supplementary Feeding Dispensers by Arctic Foxes in Norway. The Journal of Wildlife Management 84, 622–635.
| Use of Supplementary Feeding Dispensers by Arctic Foxes in Norway.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Harten, E., Reardon, T., Lumsden, L. F., Meyers, N., Prowse, T. A. A., Weyland, J., and Lawrence, R. (2019). High detectability with low impact: Optimizing large PIT tracking systems for cave-dwelling bats. Ecology and Evolution 9, 10916–10928.
| High detectability with low impact: Optimizing large PIT tracking systems for cave-dwelling bats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Watson, S. J., Hoy, J. M., Edwards, M. C., and Murray, P. J. (2022). First use of a microchip-automated nest box in situ by a brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa). Australian Mammalogy 44, 139–142.
| First use of a microchip-automated nest box in situ by a brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Witmer, G. W. (2005). Wildlife population monitoring: some practical considerations. Wildlife Research 32, 259.
| Wildlife population monitoring: some practical considerations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
