Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH FRONT

The psychotherapeutic practice and potential of mental health nurses: an Australian survey

Richard Lakeman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4304-5431 A E , Andrew Cashin B , John Hurley C and Tom Ryan D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast Campus, Southern Cross Drive, Bilinga, Qld 4225, Australia.

B School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia. Email: andrew.cashin@scu.edu.au

C School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Hogbin Drive, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia. Email: john.hurley@scu.edu.au

D Mental Health Service Group, Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Qld 4814, Australia. Email: tom.ryan@health.qld.gov.au

E Corresponding author. Email: richard.lakeman@scu.edu.au

Australian Health Review 44(6) 916-923 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH19208
Submitted: 21 September 2019  Accepted: 25 March 2020   Published: 30 October 2020

Abstract

Objective Mental health nurses (MHNs) have a long, under-recognised, history of engaging in psychotherapeutic practice across the spectrum of mental illness and mental health problems. There is a need for a psychotherapeutic response for people with complex or serious mental health problems within the stepped care model and in response to increased need for psychotherapeutic responses to COVID-19 and natural disasters. This project sought to identify the educational preparation and self-reported competency of MHNs to clinically undertake psychotherapy across the continuum of care.

Methods Situated within a larger mixed-methods study exploring how MHNs practice psychotherapy, adapt it to routine care and envisage the future, this paper reports the findings from a survey of MHNs regarding their educational preparation, experience and competence in modalities of psychotherapy and the application of psychotherapy with specific clinical groups.

Results In all, 153 MHNs responded to a request to participate in the study. In this cohort, 86% of nurses had postgraduate qualifications specific to psychotherapy and 95% had worked for over 10 years in the mental health field and had hundreds of hours of training in psychotherapy. There was a high level of self-reported competence in working with people with serious mental health problems and at-risk or vulnerable groups.

Conclusions Currently, MHNs are not recognised in federal funding arrangements to procure psychotherapeutic intervention for members of the Australian population who require it. MHNs ought to be recognised as independent providers based on both the psychotherapeutic skills they possess and their specialist clinical skills of working with people across the spectrum of mental health problems. Appropriately qualified MHNs need to be funded to use their skills in psychotherapy via access to appropriate funding arrangements, such as Better Access and the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

What is known about the topic? MHNs do not appear to be recognised as having postgraduate knowledge and skills in psychotherapy and other psychotherapeutic interventions. This lack of recognition has resulted in the Australian public being unable to access subsidised specialist psychotherapeutic services by this highly experienced group. Most published commentary has been around the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program, but, to date, scholarly work related to this program has not influenced public views and policy formation despite multiple favourable evaluations.

What does this paper add? This study highlights that MHNs possess a largely unrecognised and valuable skill set in psychotherapy practice that they can adapt to work with people with complex needs.

What are the implications to practitioners? MHNs possess skills and experience that, if recognised and funded, could be rapidly mobilised to improve consumer outcomes across the continuum of stepped care and in response to increased need during COVID-19.


References

[1]  Hickie I. Time for structural reform in mental health: who is up for the challenge? Aust Health Rev 2019; 43 361–2.
Time for structural reform in mental health: who is up for the challenge?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32171339PubMed |

[2]  Lakeman R, McIntosh C. Perceived confidence, competence and training in evidence-based treatments for eating disorders: a survey of clinicians in an Australian regional health service. Australas Psychiatry 2018; 26 432–6.
Perceived confidence, competence and training in evidence-based treatments for eating disorders: a survey of clinicians in an Australian regional health service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29609472PubMed |

[3]  Heddaeus D, Dirmaier J, Daubmann A, Grochtdreis T, Koenig H-H, Loewe B, Maehder K, Porzelt S, Rosenkranz M, Schäfer I, Scherer M, Schulte B, von dem Knesebeck O, Wegscheider K, Weigel A, Werner S, Zimmermann T, Härter M. Clinical trial of a stepped and collaborative care model for mental illnesses and comorbidities in the Hamburg Network for Health Services Research. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2019; 62 205–13.
Clinical trial of a stepped and collaborative care model for mental illnesses and comorbidities in the Hamburg Network for Health Services Research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30607447PubMed |

[4]  Lakeman R. Mental health nurses locked out while Australia locks down. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2020;
Mental health nurses locked out while Australia locks down.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32302447PubMed |

[5]  Hurley J, Lakeman R, Cashin A, Ryan T, Muir‐Cochrane E. Mental health nurses are not quite ‘all in this together’: the struggle for equitable access to the Medicare Benefit Scheme. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2020; 29 745–6.
Mental health nurses are not quite ‘all in this together’: the struggle for equitable access to the Medicare Benefit Scheme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32530078PubMed |

[6]  Rosenberg SP, Hickie IB. Making activity-based funding work for mental health. Aust Health Rev 2013; 37 277–80.
Making activity-based funding work for mental health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23731959PubMed |

[7]  Barker P, editor. Talking cures: a guide to psychotherapies for health care professionals. London: Nursing Times Books; 1999.

[8]  Peplau HE. Interpersonal relations in nursing: a conceptual frame of reference for psychodynamic nursing. New York: Springer; 1991.

[9]  Cahill J, Paley G, Hardy G. What do patients find helpful in psychotherapy? Implications for the therapeutic relationship in mental health nursing. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2013; 20 782–91.
| 23151255PubMed |

[10]  Crowe M, Luty S. Interpersonal psychotherapy: an effective psychotherapeutic intervention for mental health nursing practice. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2005; 14 24–31.
Interpersonal psychotherapy: an effective psychotherapeutic intervention for mental health nursing practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15733282PubMed |

[11]  Hemingway S. The future of mental health nursing education in the United Kingdom: reflections on the Australian and New Zealand experience. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2016; 23 331–7.
The future of mental health nursing education in the United Kingdom: reflections on the Australian and New Zealand experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27307264PubMed |

[12]  Happell B, Platania-Phung C. Review and analysis of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program. Aust Health Rev 2019; 43 111–19.
Review and analysis of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28867005PubMed |

[13]  Lakeman R, Cashin A, Hurley J. Values and valuing mental health nursing in primary care: what is wrong with the ‘before and on behalf of’ model? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2014; 21 526–35.
Values and valuing mental health nursing in primary care: what is wrong with the ‘before and on behalf of’ model?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Department of Health. PHN primary mental health care flexible funding pool implementation guidance. Canberra: Department of Health; 2015. Available at: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/PHN-Mental_Tools [verified 9 September 2020].

[15]  Lakeman R. Unknowing: a potential common factor in successful engagement and psychotherapy with people who have complex psychosocial needs. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2014; 23 383–8.
Unknowing: a potential common factor in successful engagement and psychotherapy with people who have complex psychosocial needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24597461PubMed |

[16]  Hurley J, Lakeman R, Cashin A, Ryan T. Mental health nurse psychotherapists are well situated to improve service shortfalls in Australia: findings from a qualitative study. Australas Psychiatry 2020; 28 423–5.
Mental health nurse psychotherapists are well situated to improve service shortfalls in Australia: findings from a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32510981PubMed |

[17]  Hurley J, Lakeman R, Cashin A, Ryan T. The remarkable (disappearing act of the) mental health nurse psychotherapist. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2020; 29 652–60.
The remarkable (disappearing act of the) mental health nurse psychotherapist.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32011061PubMed |

[18]  General Practice Mental Health Standards Collaboration. Mental health training standards 2017–19: a guide for general practitioners. Melbourne: Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; 2016. Available at: https://www.racgp.org.au/download/Documents/Mental%20Health/2017-19-Mental-health-training-standards-A-guide-for-GPs.pdf [verified 9 September 2020].

[19]  Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW). Accredited mental health social workers: qualifications, skills and experience. Melbourne: AASW; 2019. Available at: https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/11704 [verified 12 August 2020].

[20]  Rosenberg SP, Hickie IB. The runaway giant: ten years of the Better Access program. Med J Aust 2019; 210 299–301.e1.
The runaway giant: ten years of the Better Access program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30929255PubMed |

[21]  Rosenberg S, Hickie I. Making better choices about mental health investment: the case for urgent reform of Australia’s Better Access Program. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2019; 53 1052–58.
Making better choices about mental health investment: the case for urgent reform of Australia’s Better Access Program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31364372PubMed |

[22]  Perkins D. Stepped care, system architecture and mental health services in Australia. Int J Integr Care 2016; 16 16
Stepped care, system architecture and mental health services in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28435424PubMed |