104 EMBRYO MANIPULATION TECHNIQUES ALTER PRE-IMPLANTATION DEVELOPMENT AND GENE EXPRESSION IN MOUSE EMBRYOS

Abstract

Micromanipulation techniques are commonly employed with human embryos; however, the long-term effects on growth and development of embryos are unknown. Subjective techniques, such as embryo grading, may not be sensitive enough to show differences in developmental potential and more objective assessments are needed. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate whether manipulation techniques and cryopreservation alter morphologic and gene expression endpoints of embryos. Two-cell mouse embryos were cultured to blastocyst stage and divided into 6 treatment groups: nonmanipulated control (UNMAN; n = 252), laser-assisted hatching (LAH; n = 124), LAH with slow cooling cryopreservation (LAHcryo; n = 78), simulated biopsy (BIOP; n = 90) performed by laser disruption of 1/8 of the embryo’s cellular volume, BIOP with slow cooling cryopreservation (BIOPcryo; n = 91), and BIOP with vitrification (BIOPvit; n = 66). After manipulation or thaw, embryos were cultured 28 h to blastocyst stage. Fully hatched and hatching blastocysts were collected for cell counts and quantitative PCR to assay absolute transcript abundance for Plac8, Glut1, Oct4, and Cox2, 18s rRNA, and Ppia using standard curves generated from serial dilutions of digested plasmids. Data were analysed using ANOVA with Duncan’s post hoc test and significance was defined as P < 0.05. Manipulation groups differed in developmental stage at 28 h postmanipulation (P = 0.03), with a larger percentage of embryos completely hatched in LAH (46%) and BIOP (45%) groups compared to UNMAN (11%). Cryopreservation reduced percentages of completely hatched embryos (LAHcryo = 26%; BIOPcryo = 31%; BIOPvit = 19%). The number of cells per embryo also varied (P < 0.001); UNMAN and LAH groups had similar numbers of blastomeres (UNMAN = 71; LAH = 74), whereas BIOP groups had reduced cell counts (BIOP = 53; BIOPcryo = 56; BIOPvit = 48). Patterns of gene expression varied between groups; the BIOP group had more cDNA per cell (UNMAN = 125 ng cell^–1; BIOP = 202 ng cell^–1; P = 0.004), whereas BIOPcryo group did not show this effect (BIOPcryo = 111 ng cell^–1). Transcript abundance of Cox2, Oct4, and Glut1 per embryo was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in biopsied embryos that were cryopreserved, either by slow-cooling or vitrification (Cox2: UNMAN = 643, BIOP = 490, BIOPcryo = 259, BIOPvit = 268; Oct4: UNMAN = 266, BIOP = 181, BIOPcryo = 95, BIOPvit = 97; Glut1: UNMAN = 643, BIOP = 490, BIOPcryo = 259, BIOPvit = 268). The data suggests that micromanipulation alters developmental timelines and gene expression of embryos. While manipulations differ in degree and nature of effect, our investigation implies all manipulations have some effect on the transcriptome of the developing embryo. Differences in cDNA quantity in the BIOP group may indicate a stress response or recovery attempt that becomes blunted in biopsied embryos which are subsequently cryopreserved. Thus, our study suggests that cryopreservation of biopsied embryos may come at a price and offers scientific support for only judiciously selected and medically indicated embryo biopsies.