Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Systematic conservation planning within a Fijian customary governance context

Hans K. Wendt A D E , Rebecca Weeks B , James Comley C and William Aalbersberg A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Applied Sciences, The University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji.

B Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

C Golder Associates Pty Ltd, 147 Coronation Drive, Milton, Qld 4064, Australia.

D Present address: The International Union for Conservation of Nature, IUCN Oceania Regional Office, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji.

E Corresponding author. Email: Hans.Wendt@iucn.org

Pacific Conservation Biology 22(2) 173-181 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC16001
Submitted: 13 January 2016  Accepted: 16 March 2016   Published: 19 April 2016

Abstract

Although conservation planning research has influenced conservation actions globally in the last two decades, successful implementation of systematic conservation plans in regions where customary marine tenure exists has been minimal. In such regions, local community knowledge and understanding of socioeconomic realities may offer the best spatially explicit information for analysis, since required socioeconomic data are not available at scales relevant to conservation planning. Here we describe the process undertaken by the Kadavu Yaubula Management Support Team, a team of researchers from The University of the South Pacific and the local communities to assess whether systematic conservation planning tools can be effectively applied and useful in a customary governance context, using a case study from Fiji. Through a participatory approach and with the aim of meeting local-scale conservation and fisheries needs, a spatial conservation planning tool, Marxan with Zones, was used to reconfigure a collection of locally designed marine protected areas in the province of Kadavu in order to achieve broader objectives. At the local scale, the real value of such tools has been in the process of identifying and conceptualising management issues, working with communities to collate data through participatory techniques, and in engaging communities in management decision making. The output and use of the tool has been of secondary value. The outcome was invaluable for developing marine protected area network design approaches that combine traditional knowledge with ecological features in a manner appropriate to a Melanesian context.


References

Airamé, S., Dugan, J. E., Lafferty, K. D., Leslie, H., McArdle, D. A., and Warner, R. R. (2003). Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: a case study from the California Channel Islands. Ecological Applications 13, 170–184.
Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: a case study from the California Channel Islands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Allison, G. W., Lubchenco, J., and Carr, M. H. (1998). Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecological Applications 8, S79–S92.
Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ardron, J., Possingham, H. P. and Klein, C. J. (Eds), Version 2. (2010). Marxan good practices handbook. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, and Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Ban, N. C., Hansen, G. J. A., Jones, M., and Vincent, A. C. J. (2009). Systematic marine conservation planning in data-poor regions: socioeconomic data is essential. Marine Policy 33, 794–800.
Systematic marine conservation planning in data-poor regions: socioeconomic data is essential.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell, J. D., Johnson, J. E., and Hobday, A. J. (Eds) (2011). Vulnerability of tropical Pacific fisheries and aquaculture to climate change. Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia.

Bottrill, M., and Pressey, R. L. (2009). Designs for nature: Regional conservation planning, implementation and management. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (Best Practice Protected Areas Guidelines Series).

Cameron, S. E., William, K. J., and Mitchell, D. K. (2008). Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning. Conservation Biology 22, 886–896.
Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18637906PubMed |

Cinner, J. E. (2007). Designing marine reserves to reflect local socioeconomic conditions: lessons from long-enduring customary management systems. Coral Reefs 26, 1035–1045.
Designing marine reserves to reflect local socioeconomic conditions: lessons from long-enduring customary management systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clarke, P., and Jupiter, S. D. (2010). Law, custom and community-based natural resource management in Kubulau District (Fiji). Environmental Conservation 37, 98–106.
Law, custom and community-based natural resource management in Kubulau District (Fiji).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fernandes, L., Day, J., Lewis, A., Slegers, S., Kerrigan, B., Breen, D., Cameron, D., Jago, B., Hall, J., Lowe, D., Innes, J., Tanzer, J., Chadwick, V., Thompson, L., Gorman, K., Simmons, M., Barnett, B., Sampson, K., De’ath, G., Mapstone, B., Marsh, H., Possingham, H., Ball, I., Ward, T., Dobbs, K., Aumend, J., Slater, D., and Stapleton, K. (2005). Establishing representative no‐take areas in the Great Barrier Reef: large‐scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 19, 1733–1744.
Establishing representative no‐take areas in the Great Barrier Reef: large‐scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Foale, S., and Manele, B. (2004). Social and political barriers to the use of marine protected areas for conservation and fishery management in Melanesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 45, 373–386.
Social and political barriers to the use of marine protected areas for conservation and fishery management in Melanesia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Game, E. T., Lipsett-Moore, G., Hamilton, R., Peterson, N., Kereseka, J., Atu, W., Watts, M., and Possingham, H. (2011). Informed opportunism for conservation planning in the Solomon Islands. Conservation Letters 4, 38–46.
Informed opportunism for conservation planning in the Solomon Islands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gillett, R. (2009). Fisheries in the economies of Pacific island countries and territories. Asian Development Bank, Manila, 373.

Gleason, M., McCreary, S., Miller-Henson, M., Ugoretz, J., Fox, E., Merrifield, M., Will, M., Paulo, S., and Hoffman, K. (2010). Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north central California. Ocean and Coastal Management 53, 52–68.
Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north central California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Govan, H., Aalbersberg, W., Tawake, A., and Parks, J. (2008). Locally-managed marine areas: a guide for practitioners. The Locally-Managed Marine Area Network.

Grantham, H. S., Agostini, V. N., Wilson, J., Mangubhai, S., Hidayat, N., Muljadi, A., Muhajir, , Rotinsulu, C., Mongdong, M., Beck, M. W., and Possingham, H. P. (2013). A comparison of zoning analyses to inform the planning of a marine protected area network in Raja Ampat, Indonesia. Marine Policy 38, 184–194.
A comparison of zoning analyses to inform the planning of a marine protected area network in Raja Ampat, Indonesia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gurney, G. G., Cinner, J., Ban, N. C., Pressey, R. L., Pollnac, R., Campbell, S. J., Tasidjawa, S., and Setiawan, F. (2014). Poverty and protected areas: an evaluation of a marine integrated conservation and development project in Indonesia. Global Environmental Change 26, 98–107.
Poverty and protected areas: an evaluation of a marine integrated conservation and development project in Indonesia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

IUCN-WCPA (International Union for Conservation of Nature – World Commission on Protected Areas) (2008). Establishing marine protected area networks – making it happen. Washington, D.C: IUCN-WCPA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and The Nature Conservancy.

Johannes, R. E. (2002). The renaissance of community-based marine resource management in Oceania. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, 317–340.
The renaissance of community-based marine resource management in Oceania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jupiter, S. D., Cohen, P. J., Weeks, R., Tawake, A., and Govan, H. (2014). Locally-managed marine areas: multiple objectives and diverse strategies. Pacific Conservation Biology 20, 165–179.

Klein, C. J., Steinback, C., Watts, M., Scholz, A. J., and Possingham, H. P. (2010). Spatial marine zoning for fisheries and conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8, 349–353.
Spatial marine zoning for fisheries and conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Leisher, C., Beukering, P.V. and Scherl, L.M. (2007). How marine protected areas contribute to poverty reduction. Nature’s Investment Bank: Report to TNC.

Leslie, H. M. (2005). A synthesis of marine conservation planning approaches. Conservation Biology 19, 1701–1713.
A synthesis of marine conservation planning approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mackelworth, P. (2012). Peace parks and transboundary initiatives: implications for marine conservation and spatial planning. Conservation Letters 5, 90–98.
Peace parks and transboundary initiatives: implications for marine conservation and spatial planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Margules, C. R., and Pressey, R. L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243–253.
Systematic conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjsFyjsLg%3D&md5=5e085c85a4ffbde0d235787c49790108CAS | 10821285PubMed |

McClanahan, T. R., and Graham, N. A. J. (2005). Recovery trajectories of coral reef fish assemblages within Kenyan marine protected areas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 294, 241–248.
Recovery trajectories of coral reef fish assemblages within Kenyan marine protected areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McClanahan, T. R., and Kaunda-Arara, B. (1996). Fishery recovery in a coral reef marine park and its effect on adjacent fishery. Conservation Biology 10, 1187–1199.
Fishery recovery in a coral reef marine park and its effect on adjacent fishery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McClanahan, T. R., and Mangi, S. (2000). Spillover of exploitable fishes from a marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery. Ecological Applications 10, 1792–1805.
Spillover of exploitable fishes from a marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mills, M., Jupiter, S. D., Pressey, R. L., Ban, N. C., and Comley, J. (2011). Incorporating effectiveness of community-based management in a national marine gap analysis for Fiji. Conservation Biology 25, 1155–1164.
Incorporating effectiveness of community-based management in a national marine gap analysis for Fiji.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21978136PubMed |

Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P. J., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T. H., and Rouget, M. (2006). Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 681–687.
Integrating economic costs into conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Polasky, S. (2008). Why conservation planning needs socioeconomic data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 6505–6506.
Why conservation planning needs socioeconomic data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXmtVOhu7c%3D&md5=06b7f220fe7e75a98f8db86e3436505aCAS | 18448673PubMed |

Roelfsema, C., Phinn, S., Jupiter, S., Comley, J., and Albert, S. (2013). Mapping coral reefs at reef to reef-system scales, 10s–1000s km2, using object-based image analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing 34, 6367–6388.
Mapping coral reefs at reef to reef-system scales, 10s–1000s km2, using object-based image analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russ, G. R., and Alcala, A. C. (2003a). Marine reserves have rapid and lasting effects. Ecology Letters 5, 361–366.

Sandwith, T., Shine, C., Hamilton L., and Sheppard, D. (2001). ‘Transboundary Protected Areas for Peace and Co-operation.’ Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 7. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.)

South, R. G., and Veitayaki, J. (1998). The constitution and indigenous fisheries management in Fiji. Ocean Yearbook 13, 452–466.
The constitution and indigenous fisheries management in Fiji.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stewart, R. R., and Possingham, H. P. (2005). Efficiency, costs and trade-offs in marine reserve system design. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10, 203–213.
Efficiency, costs and trade-offs in marine reserve system design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tawake, A., Nailetica, L., Ravula, J., Dugmore, M. C. H., Pickering, K. and Tamanivalu, R. (2005). A report on the effectiveness and site suitability of 5 tabu areas (MPAs) in Kadavu. KYMST Report. October 2005.

UNEP/GRID-ARENDAL. (2008). Fishing for the future in Fiji. Environmental wealth of rural communities. Environment and Poverty Times No. 5., pp. 4–5.

Veitayaki, J., Aalbersberg, B., Tawake, A., Rupeni, E. and Tabunakawai, K. (2003). Mainstreaming resource conservation: the Fiji Locally Managed Marine Areas network and national policy development. Innovative governance: indigenous peoples, local communities, and protected areas, 105–123.

Watts, M.E., Klein, C. K., Stewart, R., Ball, I. R. and Possingham, H. P. (2008). Marxan with zones (V1.0.1). Conservation zoning using spatially explicit annealing, a manual.

Weeks, R., and Jupiter, S. D. (2013). Adaptive comanagement of a marine protected area network in Fiji. Conservation Biology 27, 1234–1244.
Adaptive comanagement of a marine protected area network in Fiji.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24112643PubMed |

Weeks, R., Russ, G. R., Bucol, A. A., and Alcala, A. C. (2010a). Incorporating local tenure in the systematic design of marine protected area networks. Conservation Letters 3, 445–453.
Incorporating local tenure in the systematic design of marine protected area networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weeks, R., Russ, G. R., Bucol, A. A., and Alcala, A. C. (2010b). Shortcuts for marine conservation planning: the effectiveness of socioeconomic data surrogates. Biological Conservation 143, 1236–1244.
Shortcuts for marine conservation planning: the effectiveness of socioeconomic data surrogates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weeks, R., Aliño, P. M., Atkinson, S., Beldia, P., Binson, A., Campos, W. L., Djohani, R., Green, A. L., Hamilton, R., Horigue, V., Jumin, R., Kalim, K., Kasasiah, A., Kereseka, J., Klein, C. J., Laroya, L., Magupin, S., Masike, B., Mohan, C., Da Silva Pinto, R. M., Vave-Karamui, A., Villanoy, C., Welly, M., and White, A. T. (2014). Developing marine protected area networks in the Coral Triangle: good practices for expanding the Coral Triangle Marine Protected Area System. Coastal Management 42, 183–205.
Developing marine protected area networks in the Coral Triangle: good practices for expanding the Coral Triangle Marine Protected Area System.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wendt, H. K. (2013). Applying geographic information system and spatial conservation planning tools to strengthen the design of a community-based marine protected area network. A case study of the island province of Kadavu, Fiji. M.Sc. Thesis, University of the South Pacific.