Non-target species interaction with sodium fluoroacetate (1080) meat bait for controlling feral pigs (Sus scrofa)
Amanda Millar A , Matthew Gentle B C and Luke K.-P. Leung AA School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.
B Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
C Corresponding author: Email Matthew.Gentle@daf.qld.gov.au
Pacific Conservation Biology 21(2) 158-162 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC14915
Submitted: 27 November 2014 Accepted: 14 April 2015 Published: 26 June 2015
Abstract
Fresh meat baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) are widely used for controlling feral pigs in Queensland, but there is a potential poisoning risk to non-target species. This study investigated the non-target species interactions with meat bait by comparing the time until first approach, investigation, sample and consumption, and whether dying bait green would reduce interactions. A trial assessing species interactions with undyed bait was completed at Culgoa Floodplain National Park, Queensland. Meat baits were monitored for 79 consecutive days with camera traps. Of 40 baits, 100% were approached, 35% investigated (moved) and 25% sampled, and 25% consumed. Monitors approached (P < 0.05) and investigated (P < 0.05) the bait more rapidly than pigs or birds, but the median time until first sampling was not significantly different (P > 0.05), and did not consume any entire bait. A trial was conducted at Whetstone State Forest, southern Queensland, with green-dyed and undyed baits monitored for eight consecutive days with cameras. Of 60 baits, 92% were approached and also investigated by one or more non-target species. Most (85%) were sampled and 57% were consumed, with monitors having slightly more interaction with undyed baits than with green-dyed baits. Mean time until first approach and sample differed significantly between species groups (P = 0.038 and 0.007 respectively) with birds approaching sooner (P < 0.05) and monitors sampling later (P < 0.05) than other (unknown) species (P > 0.05). Undyed bait was sampled earlier (mean 2.19 days) than green-dyed bait (2.7 days) (P = 0.003). Data from the two trials demonstrate that many non-target species regularly visit and sample baits. The use of green-dyed baits may help reduce non-target uptake, but testing is required to determine the effect on attractiveness to feral pigs. Further research is recommended to quantify the benefits of potential strategies to reduce the non-target uptake of meat baits to help improve the availability of bait to feral pigs.
Additional keyword: poison baiting.
References
Bengsen, A. J., Gentle, M. N., Mitchell, J. L., Pearson, H. E., and Saunders, G. R. (2014). Impacts and management of wild pigs Sus scrofa in Australia. Mammal Review 44, 135–147.| Impacts and management of wild pigs Sus scrofa in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Choquenot, D., McIlroy, J., and Korn, T. (1996). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Pigs.’ (Bureau of Resource Sciences: Canberra.)
Christensen, P. E. S., Ward, B. G., and Sims, C. (2013). Predicting bait uptake by feral cats, Felis catus, in semi-arid environments. Ecological Management & Restoration 14, 47–53.
| Predicting bait uptake by feral cats, Felis catus, in semi-arid environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cowled, B. D., Gifford, E., Smith, M., Staples, L., and Lapidge, S. J. (2006a). Efficacy of manufactured PIGOUT® baits for localised control of feral pigs in the semi-arid Queensland rangelands. Wildlife Research 33, 427–437.
| Efficacy of manufactured PIGOUT® baits for localised control of feral pigs in the semi-arid Queensland rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cowled, B. D., Lapidge, S. J., Smith, M., and Staples, L. (2006b). Attractiveness of a novel omnivore bait, PIGOUT®, to feral pigs (Sus scrofa) and assessment of risks of bait uptake by non-target species. Wildlife Research 33, 651–660.
| Attractiveness of a novel omnivore bait, PIGOUT®, to feral pigs (Sus scrofa) and assessment of risks of bait uptake by non-target species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of the Environment (2013). Threat abatement advice for predation, habitat degradation, competition and disease transmission by feral pigs. Department of the Environment, Canberra.
Fleming, P. J. S., and Parker, R. W. (1991). Temporal decline of 1080 within meat baits used for control of wild dogs in New South Wales. Wildlife Research 18, 729–740.
| Temporal decline of 1080 within meat baits used for control of wild dogs in New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gentle, M., and Pople, A. (2013). Effectiveness of commercial harvesting in controlling feral pig populations. Wildlife Research 40, 459–469.
| Effectiveness of commercial harvesting in controlling feral pig populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gentle, M., Massei, G., and Quy, R. (2006). Diversity of diet influences the persistence of conditioned taste aversion in rats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97, 303–311.
| Diversity of diet influences the persistence of conditioned taste aversion in rats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gentle, M., Speed, J., and Pople, T. (2014). Impacts on nontarget avian species from aerial meat baiting for feral pigs. Ecological Management & Restoration 15, 222–230.
| Impacts on nontarget avian species from aerial meat baiting for feral pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gong, W., Sinden, J., Braysher, M., and Jones, R. (2009). ‘The Economic Impacts of Vertebrate Pests in Australia.’ (Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre: Canberra.)
Hartley, L., Waas, J., O’Connor, C., and Matthews, L. (2000). Colour preferences and coloured bait consumption by weka Gallirallus australis, an endemic New Zealand rail. Biological Conservation 93, 255–263.
| Colour preferences and coloured bait consumption by weka Gallirallus australis, an endemic New Zealand rail.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hone, J., Bryant, H., Nicholls, P., Atkinson, W., and Kleba, R. (1985). The acceptance of dyed grain by feral pigs and birds. III. Comparison of intakes of dyed and undyed grain by feral pigs and birds in pig-proof paddocks. Australian Wildlife Research 12, 447–454.
| The acceptance of dyed grain by feral pigs and birds. III. Comparison of intakes of dyed and undyed grain by feral pigs and birds in pig-proof paddocks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jongman, E., Selby, E., Barnett, J., Fisher, P., and Temby, I. (2000). Feeding preferences in captive corellas for green-dyed and plain oats. Corella 24, 62–64.
Kleba, R., Hone, J., and Robards, G. (1985). The acceptance of dyed grain by feral pigs and birds. II. Penned feral pigs. Australian Wildlife Research 12, 51–55.
| The acceptance of dyed grain by feral pigs and birds. II. Penned feral pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Long, J. (2003). ‘Introduced Mammals of the World: Their History, Distribution, and Influence.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
McIlroy, J. C. (1983). The sensitivity of Australian animals to 1080 poison. V. The sensitivity of feral pigs, Sus scrofa, to 1080 and its implications for poisoning campaigns. Wildlife Research 10, 139–148.
| The sensitivity of Australian animals to 1080 poison. V. The sensitivity of feral pigs, Sus scrofa, to 1080 and its implications for poisoning campaigns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McIlroy, J. C. (1984). The sensitivity of Australian animals to 1080 poison. VII. Native and introduced Birds. Wildlife Research 11, 373–385.
| The sensitivity of Australian animals to 1080 poison. VII. Native and introduced Birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Saunders, G., Kay, B., and McLeod, L. (1999). Caching of baits by foxes (Vulpes vulpes) on agricultural lands. Wildlife Research 26, 335–340.
| Caching of baits by foxes (Vulpes vulpes) on agricultural lands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomson, P., and Kok, N. E. (2002). The fate of dried meat baits laid for fox control: the effects of bait presentation on take by foxes and non-target species, and on caching by foxes. Wildlife Research 29, 371–377.
| The fate of dried meat baits laid for fox control: the effects of bait presentation on take by foxes and non-target species, and on caching by foxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Twigg, L. E., Eldridge, S. R., Edwards, G. P., Shakeshaft, B. J., de Preu, N. D., and Adams, N. (2000). The longevity and efficacy of 1080 meat baits used for dingo control in central Australia. Wildlife Research 27, 473–481.
| The longevity and efficacy of 1080 meat baits used for dingo control in central Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Twigg, L. E., Kok, N. E., Kirkpatrick, W. E., and Burrow, G. (2001). The longevity of 1080 egg-baits in a regularly baited nature reserve in south-western Australia. Wildlife Research 28, 607–618.
| The longevity of 1080 egg-baits in a regularly baited nature reserve in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woodford, L. P., Robley, A., Maloney, P., and Reside, J. (2012). The impact of 1080 bait removal by lace monitors (Varanus varius) or a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) control programme. Ecological Management & Restoration 13, 306–308.
| The impact of 1080 bait removal by lace monitors (Varanus varius) or a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) control programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
