Producer-initiated field research leads to a new diagnostic test for footrot
C. A. Gaden A E , B. F. Cheetham B , E. Hall C , G. Green D and M. E. Katz BA ‘Beaumont’, Invergowrie, NSW 2350, Australia.
B Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C Margaret Street, Launceston, Tas. 7250, Australia.
D Livestock Health and Pest Authority, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: cagaden@iprimus.com.au
Animal Production Science 53(8) 610-617 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11175
Submitted: 13 August 2011 Accepted: 2 March 2012 Published: 10 July 2013
Journal Compilation © CSIRO Publishing 2013 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
The Cicerone Project was formed in 1998 to address problems faced by wool producers. In the New England area, the issue of suspected false positive diagnoses of virulent footrot, which can be a significant cause of economic loss to individual producers, was investigated. In New South Wales, footrot diagnosis is primarily a field diagnosis supported by the gelatin gel laboratory test. The principal causative agent of footrot is Dichelobacter nodosus. If the gelatin gel test finds strains of D. nodosus to be thermostable (gel stable), a finding of virulent footrot is likely and quarantine of the affected property follows. However, livestock producers and inspectors reported that there were a considerable number of cases where laboratory tests found strains to be stable but these strains did not cause virulent footrot in the field. Preliminary results using DNA markers associated with virulent footrot showed that one of these markers, intA, was absent in gel stable, field benign strains but present in all strains tested which caused field virulent footrot. A trial conducted at Uralla, New South Wales, demonstrated conclusively that there were strains of D. nodosus which were stable in the gelatin gel test but did not cause virulent footrot in the field. All of these strains were negative in the intA DNA test. These results were confirmed in a second field trial at Molong, New South Wales. These trials were instrumental in establishing that the gelatin gel test at times gave results inconsistent with the clinical expression of footrot, potentially leading to a false positive diagnosis of virulent footrot. Subsequent research led to confirmation of the intA test, which is now available as an additional tool for footrot diagnosis.
References
Bloomfield GA, Whittle G, McDonagh MB, Katz ME, Cheetham BF (1997) Analysis of sequences flanking the vap regions of Dichelobacter nodosus: evidence for multiple integration events, a killer system, and a new genetic element. Microbiology 143, 553–562.| Analysis of sequences flanking the vap regions of Dichelobacter nodosus: evidence for multiple integration events, a killer system, and a new genetic element.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXht1emsrk%3D&md5=5172c00c63a4c4cd9bd0e249adf76d33CAS | 9043132PubMed |
Cheetham BF, Tanjung LR, Sutherland M, Druitt J, Green G, McFarlane J, Bailey GD, Seaman JT, Katz ME (2006) Improved diagnosis of virulent ovine footrot using the intA gene. Veterinary Microbiology 116, 166–174.
| Improved diagnosis of virulent ovine footrot using the intA gene.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XnsFyntb0%3D&md5=7956d6022cd25bc6713eb8dd716b779eCAS | 16716540PubMed |
Depiazzi LJ, Richards RB, Henderson J, Rood JI, Palmer M, Penhale WJ (1991) Characterisation of virulent and benign strains of Bacteroides nodosus. Veterinary Microbiology 26, 151–160.
| Characterisation of virulent and benign strains of Bacteroides nodosus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3M3itVKjtw%3D%3D&md5=48da683ebe2428b4d541ddf78faa8aa1CAS | 2024437PubMed |
Gelman A, Hill J (2007) ‘Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)
Palmer MA (1993) A gelatin test to detect activity and stability of proteases produced by Dichelobacter (bacteroides) nodosus. Veterinary Microbiology 36, 113–122.
| A gelatin test to detect activity and stability of proteases produced by Dichelobacter (bacteroides) nodosus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXivFamt7o%3D&md5=5397e4bba9639bad12584039eb864362CAS | 8236773PubMed |
Stewart DJ (1979) The role of elastase in the differentiation of Bacteroides nodosus infections in sheep and cattle. Research in Veterinary Science 27, 99–105.
Stewart DJ, Clark BL, Jarrett RG (1984) Differences between strains of Bacteroides nodosus in their effects on the severity of foot-rot, bodyweight and wool growth in Merino sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 61, 348–352.
| Differences between strains of Bacteroides nodosus in their effects on the severity of foot-rot, bodyweight and wool growth in Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2M7kvFSgtg%3D%3D&md5=bf34fce3652ee78064fd92f080122796CAS | 6529394PubMed |
Sutherland H, Scott JM, Gray GD, Woolaston RR (2013) Creating the Cicerone Project: seeking closer engagement between livestock producers, research and extension. Animal Production Science 53, 593–601.
| Creating the Cicerone Project: seeking closer engagement between livestock producers, research and extension.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whittington RJ, Nicholls PJ (1995) Grading the lesions of ovine footrot. Research in Veterinary Science 58, 26–34.
| Grading the lesions of ovine footrot.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3isVektA%3D%3D&md5=06d785e20b00102af8c1583fe77cfc07CAS | 7709056PubMed |
Wood SN (2006) ‘Generalized additive models: an introduction with R.’ (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)
