Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

81 COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENTAL ABILITY AMONG CLONED EMBRYOS WITH VARIOUS INDIVIDUAL RECIPIENT CYTOPLASMS IN BOVINE

J. G. Zhao A , X. Y. Yang A , H. F. Liu A , H. Li A , S. Z. Huang A and Y. T. Zeng A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Institute of Medical Genetics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(2) 148-149 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv18n2Ab81
Published: 14 December 2005

Abstract

Faithful reprogramming ensures the proper activation of genes during embryonic development of the somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) in bovine. It is unambiguous that all these remodeling factors are presented in the oocyte cytoplasm (Du et al. 2002 Mol. Reprod. Dev. 63, 183–191). It will be interesting to determine if the recipient cytoplasms derived from individuals have different development ability and reprogramming competence during NT. Oocytes recovered by Ovum pickup from five Holstein heifers at 14 months of age were used as recipient cytoplasms. Cultured granulosa cells of the same origin were used as donor cells. Oocytes were enucleated at 20 h post-maturation and a single donor cell was transferred into the perivitelline space of a recipient oocyte. After fusion and activation, the reconstructed embryos were cultured in B2 medium (Laboratoire CCD, Paris, France) on a monolayer of Vero cells for 7 days. The oocyte number, development ability, and NT efficiency of recipient cytoplasm derived from each individual were compared (Table 1). Differences among individuals were verified using a chi-square test, SAS 6.12 version (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). There were significant differences of survival after fusion and the rate of development to the blastocyst stage for embryos reconstructed with recipient cytoplasm from five different individual heifers (P < 0.05). However, maturation rate, fusion rate and cleavage rate of embryos reconstructed with recipient cytoplasm from five different individual heifers presented no significant differences (P > 0.05). Reconstructed embryos with recipient cytoplasm from one heifer (03025) showed a lower survival after fusion (61% vs. 80%, 86%, 77%, 91%) but a higher ability to develop to blastocyst stage (61% vs. 24%, 31%, 52%, 31%) than the embryos from the other four heifers. The current study showed that recipient cytoplasm from various individuals may present great differences in developmental ability in nuclear transfer. This may result from different compatibility between nucleus and mitochondria or the content of maternal RNA as well as proteins in the oocyte. Further studies are needed to elucidate the genetic factors that affect the reprogramming in nuclear transfer.


Table 1. Nuclear transfer efficiency with various individual recipient cytoplasms
Click to zoom