Bathymetry, electromagnetic streamlines and the marine controlled source electromagnetic method*
Andrew Pethick 1 2 Brett Harris 11 Department of Exploration Geophysics, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.
2 Corresponding author. Email: Andrew.Pethick@postgrad.curtin.edu.au
Exploration Geophysics 45(3) 208-215 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG13050
Submitted: 21 May 2013 Accepted: 25 June 2014 Published: 24 July 2014
Abstract
Seafloor topography must influence the strength and direction of electromagnetic fields generated during deep ocean controlled source electromagnetic surveying. Neither mathematical equation nor rules of thumb provide a clear perspective of how changes in water column thickness alters electromagnetic fields that engulf hundreds of cubic kilometres of air, ocean, host and reservoir. We use streamline visualisation to provide a generalised representation of how electromagnetic fields propagate into a 2D geo-electrical setting that includes strong bathymetry. Of particular interest are: (i)’ dead zones’ where electric fields at the ocean floor are demonstrated to be weak and (ii) the ’airwave’ that appears in the electric field streamlines as circulating vortices with a shape that is clearly influenced by changes in ocean depth. Our analysis of the distribution of electric fields for deep and shallow water examples alludes to potential benefits from placement of receivers and/or transmitters higher in the water column as is the case for towed receiver geometries. Real-time streamline representation probably holds the most value at the survey planning stage, especially for shallow water marine EM surveys where ocean bottom topography is likely to be consequential.
Key words: bathymetry, CSEM, marine, MCSEM, seafloor, streamlines, topography, visualisation.
References
Amundsen, L., Laseth, L., Mittet, R., Ellingsrud, S., and Ursin, B., 2006, Decomposition of electromagnetic fields into upgoing and downgoing components: Geophysics, 71, G211–G223Andreis, D., and MacGregor, L., 2008, Controlled-source electromagnetic sounding in shallow water: principles and applications: Geophysics, 73, F21–F32
Barsukov, P. O., and Fainberg, E. B., 2013, A mobile time-domain sounding system for shallow water: First Break, 31, 53–63
Chen, J., and Alumbaugh, D. L., 2011, Three methods for mitigating airwaves in shallow water marine controlled-source electromagnetic data: Geophysics, 76, F89–F99
Davydycheva, S., and Rykhlinski, N., 2011, Focused-source electromagnetic survey versus standard CSEM: 3D modeling in complex geometries: Geophysics, 76, F27–F41
Fischer, P., 2005, New EM technology offerings are growing quickly: World Oil, 226, 1–9
Han, N., Nam, M., and Kim, H., 2010, An analysis on 3D marine CSEM responses based on a finite difference method: , , 1–4
Hansen, C., and Johnson, C., 2004, Visualization handbook: Elsevier Science.
Hesthammer, J., Stefatos, A., Boulaenko, M., Vereshagin, A., Gelting, P., Wedberg, T., and Maxwell, G., 2010, CSEM technology as a value driver for hydrocarbon exploration: Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1872–1884
Li, Y., and Constable, S., 2007, 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling: part 2 – the effect of bathymetry: Geophysics, 72, WA63–WA71
Maxwell, J. C., 1881, A treatise on electricity and magnetism, Volume 1: Clarendon Press.
Nguyen, A. K., and Roth, F., 2010, Application of the frequency differenced field to 3D inversion of shallow water CSEM data: EGM 2010 International Workshop: Adding New Value to Electromagnetic, Gravity and Magnetic Methods for Exploration, 1–5.
Pethick, A., and Harris, B., 2012, Open source interactive electromagnetic modelling: ASEG Extended Abstracts 2012, 1–4.
Pethick, A., and Harris, B., 2013a, Interpreting marine controlled source electromagnetic field behaviour with streamlines: Computers & Geosciences, 60, 1–10
Pethick, A., and Harris, B., 2013b, Poynting vector streamlines and the marine controlled source electromagnetic airwave: 75th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013, Extended Abstracts, 1–10.
Pound, G., 2007, Multi-transient EM technology at PGS: Tech Link, 7, 1–8
Scholl, C., and Sinkevich, V. A., 2012, Modeling MCSEM data with a finite difference approach and an unstructured model grid in the presence of bathymetry: 21st EM Induction Workshop, 1.
Thirud, P., 2002, Waves of information: Scandinavian Oil and Gas Magazine, 3, 8–9
Wang, S., and Zhdanov, M. S., 2010, Removal of the airwave effect on MCSEM data by separation of the main part of the anomalous field: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 732–736.
Weidelt, P., 2007, Guided waves in marine CSEM: Geophysical Journal International, 171, 153–176
Zhdanov, M., 2009, Geophysical electromagnetic theory and methods: Elsevier.