Articles citing this paper
Constant and Interchanged Photoperiod Effects on the Rate of Development in Barley (Hordeum vulgare)
GC Kernich, GM Halloran and RG Flood
23(4) pp.489 - 496
8 articles found in Crossref database.
Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity
Adams Steven R.,
Pearson Simon, Hadley Paul
Journal of Experimental Botany. 2001 52(357). p.655
Photoperiod-sensitive development phases in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
Bertero H.D,
King R.W, Hall A.J
Field Crops Research. 1999 60(3). p.231
Effects of loci determining photoperiod sensitivity (Ppd‐H1) and vernalization response (Sh2) on agronomic traits in the ‘Dicktoo’בMorex’ barley mapping population
Karsai I.,
Mészáros K.,
Szücs P.,
Hayes P. M.,
Láng L., Bedö Z.
Plant Breeding. 1999 118(5). p.399
Developmental responses to sowing date in wheat, barley and rapeseed
Miralles Daniel J,
Ferro Brenda C, Slafer Gustavo A
Field Crops Research. 2001 71(3). p.211
Phenological Characterization of Near‐Isogenic Sunflower Families Bearing Two QTLs for Photoperiodic Response
Fonts C.,
Andrade F. H.,
Grondona M.,
Hall A., León A. J.
Crop Science. 2008 48(4). p.1579
Awn primordium to tipping is the most decisive developmental phase for spikelet survival in barley
Alqudah Ahmad M., Schnurbusch Thorsten
Functional Plant Biology. 2014 41(4). p.424
A model of sorghum photoperiodism using the concept of threshold-lowering during prolonged appetence
Dingkuhn Michael,
Kouressy Mamoutou,
Vaksmann Michel,
Clerget Benoît, Chantereau Jacques
European Journal of Agronomy. 2008 28(2). p.74
Exploration, Identification and Utilization of Barley Germplasm (2016)
