Articles citing this paper
Environmental impacts and resource use from Australian pork production determined using life cycle assessment. 2. Energy, water and land occupation
Stephen G. Wiedemann A D , Eugene J. McGahan B and Caoilinn M. Murphy C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Integrity Ag Services, 36a Highfields Road, Highfields, Qld 4352, Australia.
B 2 Somerset Street, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
C Point Advisory, 31 Queen Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: stephen.wiedemann@integrityag.net.au
Animal Production Science 58(6) 1153-1163 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16196
Submitted: 31 March 2016 Accepted: 15 November 2016 Published: 30 March 2017
15 articles found in Crossref database.
Wastes to profit: a circular economy approach to value-addition in livestock industries
Ramirez Jerome,
McCabe Bernadette,
Jensen Paul D.,
Speight Robert,
Harrison Mark,
van den Berg Lisa, O'Hara Ian
Animal Production Science. 2021 61(6). p.541
Intensifying the environmental performance of chicken meat production in China: From perspective of life cycle assessment
Cheng Ziyue,
Jia Yuke,
Bai Yueyang,
Zhang Tianzuo,
Ren Ke,
Zhou Xinying,
Zhai Yijie,
Shen Xiaoxu, Hong Jinglan
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023 384 p.135603
Life cycle assessment of Danish pork exports using different cooling technologies and comparison of upstream supply chain efficiencies between Denmark, China and Australia
Bonou Alexandra,
Colley Tracey A.,
Hauschild Michael Z.,
Olsen Stig I., Birkved Morten
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020 244 p.118816
Spatiotemporal variations of water, land, and carbon footprints of pig production in China
Wu Huijun,
Chen Xinyue,
Zhang Ling,
Liu Xin,
Jiang Songyan, Liu Yongxin
Environmental Research Letters. 2023 18(11). p.114032
Environmental Impacts Associated with Intensive Production in Pig Farms in Mexico through Life Cycle Assessment
Giraldi-Díaz Mario Rafael,
Castillo-González Eduardo,
De Medina-Salas Lorena,
Velásquez-De la Cruz Raúl, Huerta-Silva Héctor Daniel
Sustainability. 2021 13(20). p.11248
The Reduction of Crude Protein with the Supplementation of Amino Acids in the Diet Reduces the Environmental Impact of Growing Pigs Production Evaluated through Life Cycle Assessment
Esteves Lucas A. C.,
Monteiro Alessandra N. T. R.,
Sitanaka Natália Y.,
Oliveira Paula C.,
Castilha Leandro D.,
Paula Vinicius R. C., Pozza Paulo C.
Sustainability. 2021 13(9). p.4815
Effect of environmental enrichment and group size on the water use and waste in grower-finisher pigs
Misra Shilpi,
Bokkers Eddie A. M.,
Upton John,
Quinn Amy J., O’Driscoll Keelin
Scientific Reports. 2021 11(1).
Climate Changes Mitigation and Sustainable Bioenergy Harvest Through Animal Waste (2023)
The societal role of meat: the Dublin Declaration with an Australian perspective
Pethick David W.,
Bryden Wayne L.,
Mann Neil J.,
Masters David G.,
Lean Ian J., Dunshea Frank
Animal Production Science. 2023 63(18). p.1805
Environmental impact and adaptation study of pig farming relocation in China
Zheng Guodi,
Li Mengqiu,
Shen Yujun,
Yu Bao,
Chen Tongbin, Liu Xiaoyan
Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2021 89 p.106593
Review: Analysis of the process and drivers for cellular meat production
Warner R.D.
Animal. 2019 13(12). p.3041
A systematic literature review of life cycle assessments on primary pig production: Impacts, comparisons, and mitigation areas
Gislason Styrmir,
Birkved Morten, Maresca Alberto
Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2023 42 p.44
Using a gate-to-gate LCA to apply circular economy principles to a food processing SME
Colley Tracey A.,
Birkved Morten,
Olsen Stig I., Hauschild Michael Z.
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020 251 p.119566
Organic Farming as a Strategy to Reduce Carbon Footprint in Dehesa Agroecosystems: A Case Study Comparing Different Livestock Products
Horrillo Andrés,
Gaspar Paula, Escribano Miguel
Animals. 2020 10(1). p.162
Energy and carbon footprints of chicken and pork from intensive production systems in Argentina
Arrieta Ezequiel M., González Alejandro D.
Science of The Total Environment. 2019 673 p.20
