In vitro characteristics of fresh and frozen–thawed ram spermatozoa after sex sorting and re-freezing
S. P. de Graaf A B , G. Evans A , W. M. C. Maxwell A and J. K. O’Brien AA Centre for Advanced Technologies in Animal Genetics and Reproduction (ReproGen), Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: simong@vetsci.usyd.edu.au
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(8) 867-874 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD06061
Submitted: 26 June 2006 Accepted: 2 August 2006 Published: 22 November 2006
Abstract
The in vitro function of sex-sorted, frozen–thawed ram spermatozoa derived from fresh or frozen semen was investigated. Sorted, frozen–thawed spermatozoa had higher (P < 0.05) motility, viability, acrosome integrity and mitochondrial activity than non-sorted, frozen–thawed controls immediately following thawing and after incubation at 37°C for 3 and 6 h. Similarly, frozen–thawed, sorted, re-frozen–thawed spermatozoa outperformed (P < 0.05) non-sorted controls upon thawing (mitochondrial activity) and following a 3-h incubation (motility, viability/acrosome integrity and mitochondrial activity), but there were no differences after incubation for 6 h (P > 0.05). Velocity characteristics (computer assisted sperm assessment 0–6 h post-thaw) of sorted spermatozoa derived from either fresh or frozen semen remained inferior (P < 0.05) to non-sorted spermatozoa, as did their ability to penetrate artificial cervical mucus after thawing. Direct comparison of cryopreserved spermatozoa derived from either fresh or frozen semen revealed that frozen–thawed, sorted, re-frozen–thawed spermatozoa had comparable (P > 0.05) motility, viability/acrosome integrity, mitochondrial activity, average path velocity and oviducal binding capacity immediately post-thaw, but reduced (P < 0.05) quality after 3 and 6 h of incubation. These findings indicate that, under the tested in vitro conditions, sex-sorted spermatozoa derived from fresh semen are superior in some respects to those derived from frozen semen. Further, that the use of either technique, while reducing velocity characteristics and cervical mucus penetration, results in comparable, if not enhanced motility, membrane and mitochondrial function in the post-thaw population of spermatozoa when compared with non-sorted, frozen–thawed controls.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by XY, Inc. (Fort Collins, CO, USA). S. P. de Graaf was supported by The Australian Sheep CRC with a postgraduate research scholarship. Bioniche Animal Health Australasia is thanked for the donation of sodium hyaluronate for sperm migration tests. The authors wish to thank Dr M. Ruckholdt for operation of the MoFlo SX cell sorter, Ms S. Underwood, Ms K. Heasman and Mr A. Souter for technical support, and Dr L. Gillan for assistance and advice during preparation of the OECMs.
Cox, J. F. , Zavala, A. , Saravia, F. , Rivas, C. , Gallardo, P. , and Alfaro, V. (2002). Differences in sperm migration through cervical mucus in vitro relates to sperm colonization of the oviduct and fertilizing ability in goats. Theriogenology 58, 9–18.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Garner, D. L. , and Thomas, C. A. (1999). Organelle-specific probe JC-1 identifies membrane potential differences in the mitochondrial function of bovine sperm. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 53, 222–229.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Johnson, L. A. , and Welch, G. R. (1999). Sex preselection: high-speed flow cytometric sorting of X and Y sperm for maximum efficiency. Theriogenology 52, 1323–1341.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Maxwell, W. M. C. , Evans, G. , Mortimer, S. T. , Gillan, L. , Gellatly, E. S. , and McPhie, C. A. (1999). Normal fertility in ewes after cervical insemination with frozen–thawed spermatozoa supplemented with seminal plasma. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 11, 123–126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
O’Brien, J. K. , and Robeck, T. R. (2006). Development of sperm sexing and associated assisted reproductive technology for sex preselection of captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18, 319–329.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
O’Brien, J. K. , Hollinshead, F. K. , Evans, K. M. , Evans, G. , and Maxwell, W. M. C. (2003). Flow cytometric sorting of frozen–thawed spermatozoa in sheep and non-human primates. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 15, 367–375.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
O’Brien, J. K. , Stojanov, T. , Crichton, E. G. , Evans, K. M. , Leigh, D. , Maxwell, W. M. C. , Evans, G. , and Loskutoff, N. M. (2005). Flow cytometric sorting of fresh and frozen–thawed spermatozoa in the western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Am. J. Primatol. 66, 297–315.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
O’Donnell, J. M. (1969). Intracellular levels of sodium and potassium in bull spermatozoa in relation to cell metabolism. J. Reprod. Fertil. 19, 207–209.
| PubMed |
Schenk, J. L. , and DeGrofft, D. L. (2003). Insemination of cow elk with sexed frozen semen. Theriogenology 59, 514.
Seidel, G. E. , Schenk, J. L. , Herickhoff, L. A. , Doyle, S. P. , Brink, Z. , Green, R. D. , and Cran, D. G. (1999). Insemination of heifers with sexed sperm. Theriogenology 52, 1407–1420.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Stap, J. , Hoebe, R. A. , Merton, J. S. , Haring, R. M. , Bakker, P. J. M. , and Aten, J. A. (1998). Improving the resolution of cryopreserved X- and Y-sperm during DNA flow cytometric analysis with the addition of Percoll to quench the fluorescence of dead sperm. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 1896–1902.
| PubMed |
Suh, T. K. , Schenk, J. L. , and Seidel, G. E. (2005). High pressure flow cytometric sorting damages sperm. Theriogenology 64, 1035–1048.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Szasz, F. , Sirivaidyapong, S. , Cheng, F. P. , Voorhout, W. F. , Marks, A. , Colenbrander, B. , Solti, A. L. , and Gadella, B. M. (2000). Detection of calcium ionophore induced membrane changes in dog sperm as a simple method to predict the cryopreservability of dog semen. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 55, 289–298.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |