Development of national animal genetic resource programs
H. D. BlackburnNational Animal Germplasm Program, National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA. email: hblackbu@lamar.colostate.edu
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 16(2) 27-32 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD03075
Submitted: 1 August 2003 Accepted: 1 October 2003 Published: 2 January 2004
Abstract
Globally, animal genetic resources are contracting due to economic forces. As a result, during the 1990s there was a dramatic increase in national animal genetic resource activities. Many national programmes were initiated and the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations played a prominent role in coalescing national actions. Nationally, programmes have been initiated that comprise of in situ, ex situ and information-exchange efforts. A critical element to national conservation efforts is the development of cryopreserved collections of germplasm. Several countries have initiated substantial multispecies collections of cryopreserved germplasm. The selection of animals within breeds of interest is an important consideration in building cryopreserved collections. Animal selection should be based on a lack of genetic relationship, with sufficient numbers of animals to ensure the capture of rare alleles. Major issues facing repository development and genetic conservation are: (1) that all breeds are in need of genetic diversity management; (2) a better understanding of in situ breed population dynamics is needed; and (3) the concept that repository collections can be used by a broad range of clientele across time as well as during emergency situations.
Extra keywords: animal genetic diversity, cryopreserved germplasm, genetic repositories.
Berger, B. and Fischerleitner, F. (2003). The Austrian Gene Bank—A Cryopreservation concept. In
Blackburn, H. D. (2002). Management of US genetic resources. In
Bodo, I., Komlosi, I., Mihok, S., Szabo, P., Javor, A. and Beri, B. (2002). Genetic resources and their management in Hungary. In
Danchin-Burge, C. and Hiemstra, S. J. (2003). Cryopreservation of domestic animal species in France and The Netherlands: experiences, similarities, and differences. In
de Haan, C., Steinfeld, H., and Blackburn, H. (1997).
FAO (1993). ‘An Integrated Global Programme to Establish the Genetic Relationships Among the Breeds of Each Domestic Animal Species. Report of a Working Group.’ (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations: Rome.)
FAO (1998).
FAO (2000).
Fimland, E. (2003). Status and proposals of future plans for managing AnGR in the Nordic. In
Groeneveld, E., Yordanova, L. and Hiemstra, S. J. (2002). An adaptable management support system for national gene banks. In
Hodges, J. (2000). Conservation of farm animal biodiversity: a review of past, present and future. In ‘5th Global Conference on Conservation of Domestic Animal Genetic Resources, Brasilia, Brazil’. (Rare Breeds International: Rome.)
Holt, W. V. (2003). Germplasm cryobanking for sheep, pig and cattle breeds in the United Kingdom: the British experience. In
Khumnirdpetch, V. (2002). State of Thai animal genetic resources. In
Laing, R., Fall, A., Han, G. J. and Martyniuk, E. (1998). The convention on biological diversity and farm animal genetic resources: implications, issues and opportunities. In
Mariante, A. da S. , and Egito, A. A. (2001). Animal genetic resources in Brazil: result of five centuries of natural selection. Theriogenology 57, 223–235.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Research Council (1993).
Pizzi, F., Gandini, G. and Matassino, D. (2003). Cryobanking for animal genetic resources in Italy. In
Simianer, H. (2002).
Smith, C. (1984)
Weigel, K. A. (2001). Controlling inbreeding in modern breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 84, E177–E184.Suppl. E
Weir, B. S. (2002). Genetic distances and population histories: traps and bootstraps. In
Wright, S. (1921). Systems of mating. I Biometric relationship between parent and offspring. Genetics 6, 11.
