Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of Van Khan Tooril’s castle, an archaeological site in Mongolia, by Ground Penetrating Radar

Tseedulam Khuut 1 3 Motoyuki Sato 2 3
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, 980-8579 Sendai, Japan.

2 Center for Northeast Asian Studies, Tohoku University, 980-8576 Sendai, Japan.

3 Corresponding authors. Email: tsegii@cneas.tohoku.ac.jp, sato@cneas.tohoku.ac.jp

Exploration Geophysics 40(1) 69-76 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08117
Submitted: 6 September 2008  Accepted: 8 November 2008   Published: 27 February 2009

Abstract

We report an implementation of the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) survey at a site that corresponds to a ruined castle. The objective of the survey was to characterise buried archaeological structures such as walls and tiles in Van Khan Tooril’s Ruin, Mongolia, by 2D and 3D GPR techniques. GPR datasets were acquired in an area 10 m by 9 m, with 10 cm line spacing. Two datasets were collected, using GPR with 500 MHz and 800 MHz frequency antennas. In this paper, we report the use of instantaneous parameters to detect archaeological targets such as tile, brick, and masonry by polarimetric GPR. Radar polarimetry is an advanced technology for extraction of target scattering characteristics. It gives us much more information about the size, shape, orientation, and surface condition of radar targets.

We focused our interpretation on the strongest reflections. The image is enhanced by the use of instantaneous parameters. Judging by the shape and the width of the reflections, it is clear that moderate to high intensity response in instantaneous amplitude corresponds to brick and tiles. The instantaneous phase map gave information about the location of the targets, which appeared as discontinuities in the signal. In order to increase our ability to interpret these archaeological targets, we compared the GPR datasets acquired in two orthogonal survey directions. A good correlation is observed for the alignments of reflections when we compare the two datasets. However, more reflections appear in the north-south survey direction than in the west-east direction. This is due to the electric field orientation, which is in the horizontal plane for north-south survey directions and the horizontally polarised component of the backscattered high energy is recorded.

Key words: archaeological survey, GPR polarimetry, instantaneous amplitude, instantaneous phase, polarimetry, 3D visualisation.


Acknowledgments

We thank Professor P. Dugaraa and geophysical students of the Mongolian University of Science and Technology (MUST) for their help during acquisition of the dense 3D GPR data. We are grateful to Professor T. Navaan from the Mongolian National University for permitting GPR measurements within the archaeological site. The author thanks the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science as a part of this work was supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) 18106008.


References

Boerner W.-M., Mott H., Lüneberg E., Livingstone C., Brisco B. Brown R. J. , and Paterson J. S. , 1998, Polarimetry in Radar Remote Sensing; Basic and Applied Concepts, Chapter 5, in Manual of Remote Sensing: Principles and Applications of Imaging Radar (F.M. Henderson and A.J. Lewis, eds.). 8, Chapter 5, Wiley, 3 edn.

Conyers L. B., and Goodman D. , 1997, Ground Penetrating Radar: An Introduction for Archaeology.

Conyers L. B., 2004, Moisture and Soil Differences as Related to the Spatial Accuracy of GPR Amplitude Maps at Two Archaeological Test Sites, 10th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, ARC.1, 435–438.

Conyers L. B. , and Osburn T., 2006, GPR Mapping to Test Anthropological Hypothesis: A Study from Comb Wash, Utah, American Southwest, 11th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

Lanbo L. , 1998, GPR signal analysis: Instantaneous parameter estimation using the wavelet transform, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 219–223.

Lu Q. , 2002, Monitoring of Subsurface Environment by Ground Penetrating Radar, Tohoku Univ., MSc thesis, pp. 7–8.

Osella A. , de la Vega M. , and Lascano E., 2005, 3D electrical imaging of an archaeological site using electrical and electromagnetic methods, Geophysics, 70, G101–G107. Boerner, W.M., Mott, H. et al., 1978, Polarimetry in Radar Remote Sensing; Basic and Applied Concepts, Chapter 5, Principles & Applications of Imaging Radar.

Qian S., 2002, Introduction to Time Frequency and Wavelet Transformations, Prentice Hall Inc.

Qian S. , and Chen D., 1996, Joint Time-Frequency Analysis, Methods and applications, Prentice Hall Inc.

Sato M., 2001, Fundamentals of GPR data interpretation, (Lecture notes, unpublished).

Streich, R., and van der Kruk, J., 2006, Three-dimensional multicomponent georadar imaging of sedimentary structure: Near Surface Geophysics 4, 39–48.


Tillard, S., 1994, Radar experiments in isotropic and anisotropic geological formations (granite and schists): Geophysical Prospecting 42, 615–636.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van der Kruk, J., and Wapenaar, C., 2003, Three-dimensional imaging of multicomponent ground penetrating radar data: Geophysics 68, 1241–1254.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |