Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA03151
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 45(3)

Point-of-sale evaluation of preinoculated and custom-inoculated pasture legume seed

L. G. Gemell A , E. J. Hartley A and D. F. Herridge B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NSW Department of Primary Industries, HRI, Gosford, NSW 2250, Australia.

B NSW Department of Primary Industries, RMB 944, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: david.herridge@agric.nsw.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(3) 161-169 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA03151
Submitted: 29 July 2003  Accepted: 10 November 2003   Published: 14 April 2005

Abstract

During 1999–2003, 293 samples of preinoculated and custom-inoculated lucerne, subterranean clover, white clover, red clover and miscellaneous species (mainly other clovers) were sourced from commercial outlets and assessed for numbers of rhizobia, seed pellet pH and toxicity, and nodulation in a ‘grow-out’ test. Average rhizobial counts were 8400/seed for preinoculated lucerne, 1380/seed for subterranean clover and <100/seed for white and red clovers and for the miscellaneous species. These counts compared poorly with the average counts of 35 100/seed, 13 800/seed and 10 000/seed for freshly-inoculated lucerne, subterranean clover and white clover, respectively. Thus, overall pass rates of the preinoculated seed were reasonable for lucerne (73%), marginal for subterranean clover (32%) and very low for white clover (3%), red clover (4%) and the miscellaneous species (0%). The ‘grow-out’ tests for nodulation were positively correlated with rhizobial numbers on seed, confirming the use of plate counting of rhizobia to assess quality of pre- and custom-inoculated seed. Many of the seed pellets were toxic to the 2 clover rhizobial strains tested, although the toxicity did not affect numbers of rhizobia on the seed. In light of these results and other data on rhizobial survival on seed, we suggest the current Australian standards for rhizobial numbers on pasture legume seed at the time of sale of 500/seed (very small-seeded legumes with seed numbers >750 000/kg) and 1000/seed (other larger-seeded species, seed numbers <750 000/kg) remain in place. We recommend shelf lives be restricted to 6 months for preinoculated lucerne and the annual medics, to 6 weeks for preinoculated subterranean clover, and to 2 weeks for white clover, red clover and other miscellaneous species. In the long-term, new products and procedures will hopefully enhance the numbers and survival of rhizobia on seed such that the needs of both manufacturers and customers are satisfied.

Additional keywords: rhizobia, inoculation, nodulation, pellet, toxicity, survival.


Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the assistance of the NSW Agriculture District Agronomists in the 1999–2001 surveys. We also acknowledge the cooperation of the many seed merchants and resellers in NSW and Victoria who willingly supplied seed samples for the 2002 and 2003 surveys.


References


Brockwell J (1977) Applications of legume inoculants. In ‘A treatise on dinitrogen fixation’. (Eds RWF Hardy, AH Gibson) pp. 277–309. (John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK)

Brockwell J, Gault RR, Chase DL, Turner GL, Bergersen FJ (1985) Establishment and expression of soybean symbiosis in a soil previously free of Rhizobium japonicum. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 397–409.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Brockwell J, Gault RR, Morthorpe LJ, Peoples MB, Turner GL, Bergersen FJ (1989) Effects of soil nitrogen status and rate of inoculation on the establishment of populations of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and on the nodulation of soybeans. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 753–762. open url image1

Brockwell J, Herridge DF, Roughley RJ, Thompson JA, Gault RR (1975) Studies on seed pelleting as an aid to legume seed inoculation. 4. Examination of preinoculated seed. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 780–787.
| Crossref | Crossref |
open url image1

Catroux G, Hartmann A, Revellin C (2001) Trends in rhizobial inoculant production and use. Plant and Soil 230, 21–30.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Date RA, Roughley RJ (1977) Preparation of legume inoculants. In ‘A treatise on dinitrogen fixation’. (Eds RWF Hardy, AH Gibson) pp. 243–276. (John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK)

Deaker R, Roughley RJ, Kennedy IR (2004) Legume seed inoculation technology — a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36, 1275–1288.
| Crossref | Crossref |
open url image1

Gault RR (1981) A study of developments and trends associated with legume inoculants for use with new legume crops. Rhizobium Newsletter 26, 16–44. open url image1

Gemell G, McDonald W (2000) Inoculating and pelleting pasture legume seed. Agfact P2.2.7. NSW Agriculture, Orange, NSW.

Hiltbold AE, Thurlow DL, Skipper HD (1980) Evaluation of commercial soybean inoculants by various techniques. Agronomy Journal 72, 675–681. open url image1

Hume DJ, Blair DH (1992) Effect of numbers of Bradyrhizobium japonicum applied in commercial inoculants on soybean yield in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 38, 588–593. open url image1

Lupwayi NZ, Olsen PE, Sande ES, Keyser HH, Collins MM, Singleton PW, Rice WA (2000) Inoculant quality and its evaluation. Field Crops Research 65, 259–270.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Olsen PE, Rice WA, Bordeleau LM, Bierderbeck VO (1994) Analysis and regulation of legume inoculants in Canada: the need for an increase in standards. Plant and Soil 161, 127–134. open url image1

Roughley RJ, Gemell LG, Thompson JA, Brockwell J (1993) The number of Bradyrhizobium sp. (Lupinus) applied to seed and its effect on rhizosphere colonization, nodulation and yield of lupin. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25, 1453–1458.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Singleton P, Keyser H, Sande E (2002) Development and evaluation of liquid inoculants. In ‘Rhizobial inoculants and nitrogen fixation in Vietnam’. ACIAR Proceedings No. 109e. (Ed. DF Herridge) pp. 52–66. (ACIAR: Canberra)

Somasegaran P, Hoben HJ (1994) ‘Handbook for rhizobia. Methods in legume–Rhizobium technology.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Thompson JA, Brockwell J, Roughley RJ (1975) Preinoculation of legume seed. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 41, 253–254. open url image1

Vincent JM (1954) The control of the quality of legume seed inoculants. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 20, 247–249. open url image1

Vincent JM (1977) Quality control of inoculants. In ‘Exploiting the legume–Rhizobium symbiosis in tropical agriculture’. College of Tropical Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 145. (Eds JM Vincent, AS Whitney, J Bose) pp. 447–456. (University of Hawaii: Hawaii)