Understanding interactions between forages and concentrates is important for formulating feeding strategies for growing cattle in central Vietnam
P. T. Doyle A , C. R. Stockdale A C , Nguyen Xuan Ba B , Nguyen Huu Van B and Le Duc Ngoan BA Future Farming Systems Research, Department of Primary Industries, Kyabram Centre, 120 Cooma Road, Kyabram, Vic. 3620, Australia.
B Faculty of Animal Sciences, Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry, 102 Phung Hung Street, Hue City, Vietnam.
C Corresponding author. Email: richard.stockdale@dpi.vic.gov.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(7) 821-824 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07417
Submitted: 18 December 2007 Accepted: 6 March 2008 Published: 20 June 2008
Abstract
Three experiments were conducted in Vietnam to measure responses in forage intake and diet digestibility to concentrate feeding in growing cattle. The basal diet in all experiments was grass (elephant grass, Pennisetum purpureum, in experiments 1 and 2; native grass in experiment 3) fed at 1.25% liveweight (DM basis) during the day and rice straw fed ad libitum at night. The concentrate in experiment 1 was cassava powder plus urea. In experiments 2 and 3, a formulated concentrate comprised of maize, rice bran, fish meal, urea and salt was used. The concentrates were offered at ~0.3, 0.7, 1.3 and 2.0% liveweight in each experiment, and a zero concentrate treatment was also included. Effects of the amount of concentrate on substitution rate of concentrate for forage and on diet neutral detergent fibre (NDF) digestibility were measured to assess interactions between feeds. Substitution rate was high (0.5–0.7 kg DM reduction in forage intake per kg DM supplement consumed) and not affected by amount of supplement fed in experiment 1. In experiments 2 and 3, there was no substitution at the lowest intake of supplement, but it subsequently increased with amount of supplement consumed, to a high of 0.3–0.5 kg DM reduction in forage intake per kg DM supplement consumed. The cassava powder supplement markedly decreased dietary NDF digestibility (from 62 to 41%), whereas the formulated concentrate only reduced NDF digestibility by 11 and 8% units in experiments 2 and 3, respectively. It was calculated that depressions in NDF digestibility would reduce the estimated metabolisable energy content of the basal forage by 1–3.6 MJ/kg DM at the higher supplement intakes. The importance of these results in making decisions on tactical feeding systems to fatten cattle in central Vietnam is discussed.
Additional keywords: associative effects, substitution.
Acknowledgements
The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Department of Primary Industries Victoria and Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry (HUAF) provided financial support. Technical staff and students from HUAF provided invaluable support in collecting feed, management of the stock and during digestibility collections.
Ba NX,
Van NH,
Ngoan LD,
Gloag CM, Doyle PT
(2008a) Amount of cassava powder fed as a supplement affects feed intake and live weight gain in Laisind cattle in Vietnam. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences in press 21,
Ba NX,
Van NH,
Ngoan LD,
Gloag CM, Doyle PT
(2008b) Effects of amount of concentrate supplement on forage intake, diet digestibility and live weight gain in yellow cattle in Vietnam. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences in press 21,
Dixon RM, Stockdale CR
(1999) Associative effects between forages and grains: consequences for feed utilisation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 757–773.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huhtanen P
(1991) Associative effects of feeds in ruminants. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Science 5, 37–57.
Kempton TJ,
Nolan JV, Leng RA
(1979) Protein nutrition of growing lambs. 2. Effect on nitrogen digestion of supplementing a low-protein-cellulosic diet with either urea, casein or formaldehyde-treated casein. The British Journal of Nutrition 42, 303–315.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Mould FL,
Ørskov ER, Mann SO
(1983) Associative effects of mixed feeds. 1. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10, 15–30.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Opatpatanakit Y,
Kellaway RC,
Lean IJ,
Annison G, Kirby A
(1994) Microbial fermentation of cereal grains in vitro. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 1247–1263.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Opatpatanakit Y,
Kellaway RC,
Lean IJ,
Annison G, Kirby A
(1995) Effects of cereal grains on fibre digestion in vivo. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 403–413.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stockdale CR
(2000) Levels of pasture substitution when concentrates are fed to grazing dairy cows in northern Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 913–921.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Tudor GD, Norton BW
(1982) The nutritive value of cassava for cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14, 599.
Van Soest PJ,
Robertson JB, Lewis BA
(1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
