Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Crop damage caused by residual acetolactate synthase herbicides in the soils of south-eastern Australia

K. L. Hollaway A D , R. S. Kookana B , D. M. Noy A , J. G. Smith A and N. Wilhelm C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Vic. 3401, Australia.

B CSIRO Land and Water, PMB 2, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.

C South Australian Research and Development Institute, Plant Research Centre, GPO Box 397, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: katherine.hollaway@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(10) 1323-1331 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05053
Submitted: 15 February 2005  Accepted: 21 October 2005   Published: 13 September 2006

Abstract

Grain growers in south-eastern Australia have reported unexpected crop failures with theoretically safe recropping periods for acetolactate synthase herbicides in alkaline soils. This experience has led to the concern that these herbicides may degrade very slowly in alkaline soils, and herbicide residues have at times been blamed for unexplained crop losses. To address this issue, we established 5 recropping trials across Victoria and South Australia with 5 acetolactate synthase herbicides (chlorsulfuron, triasulfuron, metsulfuron-methyl, imazethapyr, and flumetsulam). The herbicides were applied to separate plots in years 1, 2 or 3, and sensitive crop species were sown in year 4 to measure the impact of herbicide residues. We observed that the persistence of the sulfonylureas (chlorsulfuron, triasulfuron, metsulfuron-methyl) varied between herbicides, but all persisted longer in alkaline soils than in acid soils, and were, therefore, more likely to damage crops in alkaline soil. Imazethapyr persisted longer in clay soils than in sandy soils and was, therefore, more likely to damage crops in clay soils. All herbicides persisted longer when rainfall was below average. Canola was more sensitive to imazethapyr than either pea, lentil or medic, but was less sensitive to the sulfonylureas. In contrast, lentil and medic were the most sensitive to sulfonylureas. Despite some damage, we found that safe recropping periods could be predicted from the product labels in all but one situation. The sole exception was that metsulfuron-methyl reduced dry matter and yield of lentil and medic sown 10 months after application in a soil with pH 8.5. We hypothesise that the real cause of crop failure in many situations is not unusual herbicide persistence, but failure to take full account of soil type (pH and clay content including variation in the paddock) and rainfall when deciding to recrop after using acetolactate synthase herbicides.


Acknowledgments

Thanks to Russel Argall, Terry Bertozzi, Michael Kalms, Maree Kerr, Michael Moerkerk, Noel Pederson, Roger Perris, David Puls, Shaun Seigert and Gene Tagliabue for their input into these trials and to Ray Flood for advice on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Grains Research and Development Corporation (DAS230).


References


Al Khatib K, Tamhane A (1999) Dry pea (Pisum sativum L.) response to low rates of selected foliar- and soil-applied sulfonylurea and growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technology 13, 753–758. open url image1

Australian Oilseeds Federation (2002) ‘AOF Technical and quality standards and methods of analysis for oilseeds and vegetables oils manual.’ (Australian Oilseeds Federation: Melbourne)

Beyer EMJ, Duffy MJ, Hay JV, Schlueter DD (1988) Sulfonylureas. In ‘Herbicides: chemistry, degradation and mode of action’. (Eds PC Kearney, DD Kaufmann) pp. 117–189. (Marcel Dekker: New York, NY)

Black ID, Pederson RN, Flynn A, Moerkerk M, Dyson CB, Kookana R, Wilhelm N (1999) Mobility and persistence of three sulfonylurea herbicides in alkaline cropping soils of south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 465–472.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Donald WW (1998) Estimating relative crop yield loss resulting from herbicide damage using crop ground cover or rated stunting, with maize and sethoxydim as a case study. Weed Research 38, 425–431.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fales SL, Hill RR, Hoover RJ (1990) Chemical regulation of growth and forage quality of cool-season grasses with the imazethapyr. Agronomy Journal 82, 9–17. open url image1

Ferris IG, Fawcett R, Stork P, Haigh BM, Pederson N, Rovira A (1995) Persistence and leaching of sulfonylurea herbicides in four sodic soils. In ‘Australian sodic soils: distribution, properties and management’. (Eds R Naidu, M Sumner, P Rengasamy) pp. 229–238. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Friesen GH, Wall DA (1991) Residual effects of CGA-131036 and chlorsulfuron on spring-sown rotational crops. Weed Science 39, 280–283. open url image1

Goetz AJ, Lavy TL, Gbur EE (1990) Degradation and field persistence of imazethapyr. Weed Science 38, 421–428. open url image1

Hollaway KL, Kookana RS, Noy DN, Smith JG, Wilhelm N (2006a) Persistence and leaching of sulfonylurea herbicides over a 4-year period in the highly alkaline soils of south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1069–1076.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hollaway KL, Kookana RS, Noy DN, Smith JG, Wilhelm N (2006b) Persistence and leaching of imazethapyr and flumetsulam herbicides over a 4-year period in the highly alkaline soils of south eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 669–674.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lehmann RG, Miller JR, Fontaine DD, Laskowski DA, Hunter JH, Cordes RC (1992) Degradation of a sulfonamide herbicide as a function of soil sorption. Weed Research 32, 197–205.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McDowell RW, Condron LM, Main BE, Dastgheib F (1997) Dissipation of imazapyr, flumetsulam and thifensulfuron in soil. Weed Research 37, 381–389.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Martin DA, Miller SD, Alley HP (1989) Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) response to herbicides applied at three growth stages. Weed Technology 3, 90–94. open url image1

Moyer JL, Kelley KW (1995) Broadleaf herbicide effects on tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) seedhead density, forage yield, and quality. Weed Technology 9, 270–276. open url image1

Moyer JR, Esau R, Kozub GC (1990) Chlorsulfuron persistence and response of nine rotational crops in alkaline soils of Southern Alberta. Weed Technology 4, 543–548. open url image1

Obrigawitch TT, Cook G, Wetherington J (1998) Assessment of effects on non-target plants from sulfonylurea herbicides using field approaches. Pesticide Science 52, 199–217.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Osten VA, Walker SR (1998) Recropping intervals for sulfonylurea herbicides are short in the semi-arid subtropics of Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 71–76.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

O’Sullivan J, Thomas RJ, Bouw WJ (1999) Yield and injury effects on vegetable crops planted in flumetsulam-treated soil. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 79, 417–420. open url image1

Peterson MA, Arnold WE (1986) Response of rotational crops to soil residues of chlorsulfuron. Weed Science 34, 131–136. open url image1

Stork PR (1995) Field leaching and degradation of soil applied herbicides in a gradationally textured alkaline soil: chlorsulfuron and triasulfuron. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1445–1458.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ward PR, Dunin FX, Micin SF (2002) Water use and root growth by annual and perennial pastures and subsequent crops in a phase rotation. Agricultural Water Management 53, 83–97.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1