The power of myth: the (non) impact of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) on domestic chickens (Gallus gallus)
Christa Beckmann A B and Richard Shine AA School of Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: cbec6408@mail.usyd.edu.au
Animal Production Science 50(9) 847-851 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10084
Submitted: 25 May 2010 Accepted: 21 July 2010 Published: 29 September 2010
Abstract
Myths about invasive species are widespread in the general community, even when contrary to scientific evidence. Public revulsion against invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) in Australia has encouraged the belief that toads pose a significant risk to domestic poultry, by poisoning fowls that eat toads or that drink water contaminated by toads. Although discredited by scientists in 1938, within 2 years of the toads’ introduction to Australia, the myth continues to flourish. We conducted experimental trials to evaluate the vulnerability of chickens to toad-contaminated water, and to toad ingestion. No ill effects were seen, with one chicken consuming 45 small toads without falling ill. Thus, available evidence suggests that cane toads do not imperil domestic poultry.
Additional keywords: bufotoxin, metamorph, Rhinella marina, urban legend.
Acknowledgements
We thank Eric Cox for the generous use of his pet chickens and advice. This project was funded by the Australian Research Council, and supported logistically by the Northern Territory Land Corporation. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
Allport GW, Lepkin M
(1945) Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: why some people believe them. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 40, 3–36.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified July 2009]
Beckmann C, Shine R
(2009) Impact of invasive cane toads on Australian birds. Conservation Biology 23, 1544–1549.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[Verified July 2009]
Donovan P
(2002) Crime legends in a new medium: fact, fiction and loss of authority. Theoretical Criminology 6, 189–215.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified 1 July 2009]
Griffiths AD, McKay JL
(2007) Cane toads reduce the abundance and site occupancy of Merten’s water monitor (Varanus mertensi). Wildlife Research 34, 609–615.
[Verified July 2009]
Knowles RP
(1964) The poisonous toad and the canine. Veterinary Medicine 59, 38–42.
[Verified 30 August 2010]
Phillips BL,
Brown GP, Shine R
(2003) Assessing the potential impact of cane toads on Australian snakes. Conservation Biology 17, 1738–1747.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified July 2009]
Shine R
(2010) The ecological impact of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) in Australia. The Quarterly Review of Biology in press. ,
Smith JG, Phillips BL
(2006) Toxic tucker: the potential impact of Cane Toads on Australian reptiles. Pacific Conservation Biology 12, 40–49.
Webb JK,
Brown GP,
Child T,
Greenlees MJ,
Phillips BL, Shine R
(2008) A native dasyurid predator (common planigale, Planigale maculata) rapidly learns to avoid a toxic invader. Austral Ecology 33, 821–829.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |