Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Potential of CIELAB colour scores to gauge the quality of sorghum as a feed grain for chicken-meat production

Robert J. Hughes A B F , Ali Khoddami C , Peter V. Chrystal D , Adam P. Crawford D , Sonia Y. Liu E and Peter H. Selle E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Affiliated with the School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.

B Previously with Livestock Sciences, South Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.

C School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

D Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd, Pendle Hill, NSW 2145, Australia.

E Poultry Research Foundation within the School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: robert.hughes@adelaide.edu.au

Animal Production Science 60(7) 930-935 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19410
Submitted: 19 July 2019  Accepted: 30 August 2019   Published: 18 March 2020

Abstract

Context: Cereal grains used by the poultry industry in Australia vary widely in available energy and protein content, which is often reflected as variation in bird performance. Rapid or real-time techniques for measuring the apparent metabolisable energy (AME) content of cereal grains for birds include near infrared spectroscopy, rapid visco-analysis starch pasting profiles and colour analysis.

Aims: This study involved retrospective colour analysis of Australian sorghum samples reported in recent publications, and sorghum samples used in commercial production of chicken meat in Australia. The main objective was to develop regression models as tools to predict AME values for sorghum from colour analysis of the grain for timely assistance to nutritionists formulating commercial diets and purchasing sorghum grain.

Methods: Stepwise regression analysis was used to correlate AME values for 18 samples of red, yellow and white sorghum with their CIELAB colour variables L*, a* and b*, which indicate lightness (from black to white), green-red component and blue-yellow component, respectively. The model was then used to predict AME values for sorghum in previously reported studies.

Key results: The multivariate model AMEsorghum (MJ/kg DM) = 31.139 – 0.189 L* – 0.604 a* + 0.189 b* (P = 0.0021, R2 = 0.638) was shown to predict AME of red sorghum samples to within an average difference of 0.67 MJ/kg DM in one published study. The sorghum sample showing the largest difference contained kafirin 61.5 g/kg. Data from another published study indicated larger differences (0.93 MJ/kg DM) between predicted and measured values for sorghum. The largest difference of 1.41 MJ/kg DM was observed for a sample of white sorghum containing the lowest concentrations of kafirin (41.4 g/kg), phytate (4.93 g/kg) and total phenolics (3.00 mg GAE/g).

Conclusions: CIELAB colour analysis has potential as a rapid, inexpensive indicator of AME values for sorghum as a feed grain for chicken-meat production, but high concentrations of antinutritive components, such as kafirin, detract from this potential.

Implications: A rapid, inexpensive indicator of kafirin, such as near infrared, is required to complement CIELAB colour analysis.

Additional keywords: broiler, pigment, protein, seed coat colour, starch.


References

Annison G, Choct M, Hughes RJ (1994) AME determination and its application to lupins. In ‘Proceedings of the 6th Australian poultry science symposium’, February 1994, Sydney, NSW, Australia. p. 92. (The University of Sydney: Sydney)

Black JL, Hughes RJ, Diffey S, Tredrea AM, Flinn PC, Spragg JC (2014) Rapid assessment of feed ingredient quality. In ‘Proceedings of the 25th Australian poultry science symposium’, 16–19 February 1994, Sydney, NSW, Australia. pp. 23–30. (The University of Sydney: Sydney)

Dykes L, Rooney LW, Waniska RD, Rooney WL (2005) Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of sorghum grains of varying phenotypes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53, 6813–6818.
Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of sorghum grains of varying phenotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16104804PubMed |

Hughes RJ, Black JL, Flinn PC, Tredrea AM, Diffey S (2014) Separate cereal grain calibrations for prediction of apparent metabolisable energy by near infrared reflectance analysis. In ‘Proceedings of the 25th Australian poultry science symposium’, 16–19 February 1994, Sydney, NSW, Australia. pp. 38–40. (The University of Sydney; Sydney)

Khoddami A, Truong HH, Liu SY, Roberts TH, Selle PH (2015) Concentrations of specific phenolic compounds in six red sorghums influence nutrient utilisation in broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 210, 190–199.
Concentrations of specific phenolic compounds in six red sorghums influence nutrient utilisation in broiler chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Khoddami A, Mohammadrezaei M, Roberts T (2017) Effects of sorghum malting on colour, major classes of phenolics and individual anthocyanins. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 22, 1713
Effects of sorghum malting on colour, major classes of phenolics and individual anthocyanins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Liu SY, Truong HH, Khoddami A, Moss AF, Thomson PC, Roberts TH, Selle PH (2016) Comparative performance of broiler chickens offered ten equivalent diets based on three grain sorghum varieties as determined by response surface mixture design. Animal Feed Science and Technology 218, 70–83.
Comparative performance of broiler chickens offered ten equivalent diets based on three grain sorghum varieties as determined by response surface mixture design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Palavecino PM, Penci MC, Calderón-Domínguez G, Robotta PD (2016) Chemical composition and physical properties of sorghum flour prepared from different sorghum hybrids grown in Argentina. Starch 68, 1055–1064.
Chemical composition and physical properties of sorghum flour prepared from different sorghum hybrids grown in Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rooney LW, Pflugfelder RL (1986) Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. Journal of Animal Science 63, 1607–1623.
Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 3539904PubMed |

Sedghi M, Golian A, Soleimani-Roodi P, Ahmad A, Aami-Azghadi M (2012) Relationship between color and tannin content in sorghum grain: application of image analysis and artificial neural network. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 14, 57–62.
Relationship between color and tannin content in sorghum grain: application of image analysis and artificial neural network.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Selle PH, Gill RJ, Downing JA (2010) The vulnerability of sorghum to ‘moist-heat’. In ‘Proceedings of the 21st Australian poultry science symposium’. pp. 68–71. (The University of Sydney: Sydney)

Selle PH, Liu SY, Cai J, Caldwell RA, Cowieson AJ (2014) Graded inclusions of sodium metabisulphite in sorghum-based diets: I. Reduction of disulphide cross-linkages in vitro and enhancement of energy utilisation and feed conversion efficiency in broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 190, 59–67.
Graded inclusions of sodium metabisulphite in sorghum-based diets: I. Reduction of disulphide cross-linkages in vitro and enhancement of energy utilisation and feed conversion efficiency in broiler chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Selle PH, Moss AF, Truong HH, Khoddami A, Cadogan DJ, Godwin ID, Liu SY (2018) Outlook: sorghum as a feed grain for Australian chicken-meat production. Animal Nutrition 4, 17–30.
Outlook: sorghum as a feed grain for Australian chicken-meat production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30167480PubMed |

Truong HH, Liu SY, Selle PH (2016) Starch utilisation in chicken-meat production: the foremost influential factors. Animal Production Science 56, 797–814.
Starch utilisation in chicken-meat production: the foremost influential factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Truong HH, Khoddami A, Moss AF, Liu SY, Selle PH (2017) The potential of rapid visco-analysis starch pasting profiles to gauge the quality of sorghum as a feed grain for chicken-meat production. Animal Nutrition 3, 11–18.
The potential of rapid visco-analysis starch pasting profiles to gauge the quality of sorghum as a feed grain for chicken-meat production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29767118PubMed |

World’s Poultry Science Association (1989) ‘European Table of Energy Values for Poultry Feedstuffs.’ 3rd edn. (European Federation of Branches of the World’s Poultry Science Association: Beekbergen, The Netherlands)