Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of variation in cranial size and shape in tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) populations

Claire Hadley A B , Nick Milne A and Lincoln H. Schmitt A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Anatomy and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, M309, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: chadley@anhb.uwa.edu.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 57(5) 337-345 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO08098
Submitted: 19 December 2008  Accepted: 18 May 2009   Published: 20 November 2009

Abstract

This study uses geometric morphometric techniques to examine cranial size and shape variation in nine isolated populations of the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii). A set of 36 three-dimensional landmarks were digitised on 143 tammar crania from two mainland and seven island populations. While there was no evidence of island dwarfism or gigantism, cranial size increased with both increasing island size and increasing latitude. As latitude increased, the palate narrowed relative to the nasal bones, cranial flexion and nasal height increased, and the zygomatic arches spread out laterally from the cranium. Overall, the anterior nasal aperture (nares) narrowed with increasing latitude. Mean shapes were calculated for each population, and pair-wise comparisons were made; most of these were significantly different. There was a clear tendency for island populations and those with greater geographic separation to show greater shape differentiation. Thus, regional and population differences in the cranial size and shape of tammar wallabies provide examples of selection, founder effect and random genetic drift.

Additional keywords: crania, geometric morphometrics, islands, latitude, Macropus eugenii.


Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Claire Stevenson and Ric How at the Western Australian Museum, and David Stemmer at the South Australian Museum, for providing assistance and access to the museum collections. Paul O’Higgins, Ric How and Charles Oxnard are also thanked for their help and feedback, and Sue Hayes helped with proof-reading.


References

Ashton, K. G. , Tracy, M. C. , and de Queiroz, A. (2000). Is Bergmann’s rule valid for mammals? American Naturalist 156, 390–415.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Frith H. J. , and Calaby J. H. (1969). ‘Kangaroos.’ (C. Hurst & Co.: London; and Humanities Press: New York.)

Good P. I. (2000). ‘Permutation Tests: a Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses.’ (Springer: New York)

Goodall, C. R. (1991). Procrustes methods and the statistical analysis of shape (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 53, 285–340.
Menkhorst, P., and Knight, F. (2001). ‘A Field Guide to the Mammals of Australia.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Milne, N. , and O’Higgins, P. (2002). Inter-specific variation in Macropus crania: form, function and phylogeny. Journal of Zoology 256, 12.
Tyler M. J. , Twidale C. R. , and Ling J. K. (Eds.) (1979). ‘Natural History Of Kangaroo Island.’ (Royal Society of South Australia Inc.: Adelaide.)

Wroe, S. , and Milne, N. (2007). Convergence and remarkably consistent constraint in the evolution of carnivore skull shape. Evolution 61, 1251–1260.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |