Effect of visibility on time allocation and escape decisions in crimson rosellas
Jennifer S. Boyer A , Laura L. Hass A , Matthew H. Lurie A and Daniel T. Blumstein A BA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
B Corresponding author. Email: marmots@ucla.edu
Australian Journal of Zoology 54(5) 363-367 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO05080
Submitted: 29 December 2005 Accepted: 5 October 2006 Published: 16 November 2006
Abstract
Most studies of antipredator behaviour have focused on a single behaviour at a time, but ubiquitous factors may simultaneously influence a variety of activities. Habitat structure influences visibility, which influences both the ability of prey to detect and respond to their predators. We studied how habitat visibility influenced time allocation and escape decisions of crimson rosellas (Playcercus elegans). We examined the effect of visibility on time allocated to looking, locomotion and foraging. We measured escape decisions by experimentally approaching rosellas until they fled. We measured visibility by standing 12 m away from a 1-m2 white sheet containing 36 points and counting the number of points that were visible. As measured, visibility influenced time allocated to both foraging and locomotion. However, there was no effect of visibility on flight-initiation distance or two other related measures of escape (a measure of the latency to detect an approaching threat or the latency to flee once the threat was detected). Therefore, crimson rosellas modified their behaviour as a function of visibility, but this did not influence their decision to flee from an approaching human. We infer that they are sensitive to variation in visibility, but that this does not influence their overall perception of risk as we measured it. These two stages of antipredator behaviour may thus be largely independent; ubiquitous factors need not have ubiquitous effects on different aspects of antipredator behaviour.
Acknowledgments
Research was conducted with permission from the Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community, Environment Australia, and the HMAS Creswell. We thank Brian Smith for help in the field. For financial support, we thank the UCLA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, the UCLA Office of Instructional Improvement, and the Lida Scott Brown Ornithology Trust. We thank an anonymous referee for extremely insightful comments on previous versions of this paper.
Arnez, C. L. , and Leger, D. W. (1997). Artificial visual obstruction, antipredator vigilance, and predator detection in the thirteen-lined ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus). Behaviour 134, 1101–1114.
Blumstein, D. T. , Fernández-Juricic, E. , Zollner, P. A. , and Garity, S. C. (2005b). Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 943–953.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cooper, W. E. (2003). Risk factors affecting escape behavior by the desert iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis: speed and directness of predator approach, degree of cover, direction of turning by a predator, and temperature. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 979–984.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Metcalfe, N. B. (1984). The effects of habitat on the vigilance of shorebirds: is visibility important? Animal Behaviour 32, 981–985.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rabin, L. A. , McCowan, B. , Hooper, S. L. , and Owings, D. H. (2003). Anthropogenic noise and its effects on animal communication: an interface between comparative psychology and conservation biology. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 16, 172–192.
Stankowich, T. , and Blumstein, D. T. (2005). Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 272, 2627–2634.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sun, J. W. C. , and Narins, P. M. (2005). Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate. Biological Conservation 121, 419–427.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ward, D. H. , Stehn, R. A. , Erickson, W. P. , and Derksen, D. V. (1999). Response of fall-staging Brant and Canada geese to aircraft overflights in southwestern Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management 63, 373–381.
Whittingham, M. J. , and Evans, K. L. (2004). The effects of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes. Ibis 146, 210–220.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whittingham, M. J. , Butler, S. J. , Quinn, J. L. , and Creswell, W. (2004). The effect of limited visibility on vigilance behaviour and speed of predator detection: implications for the conservation of granivorous passerines. Oikos 106, 377–385.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
