Kin cannibals: recently hatched Philoria pughi tadpoles consume unhatched siblings in isolated terrestrial nests
John Gould![https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-1316](/media/client/orcid_16x16.png)
A Conservation Science Research Group, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Australian Journal of Zoology 70(3) 83-86 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO22038
Submitted: 12 August 2022 Accepted: 1 November 2022 Published: 9 December 2022
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Abstract
Cannibalism is a behaviour exhibited across amphibian life history stages; however, there are few records that involve cannibalism between siblings. Here, we describe observations of recently hatched tadpoles of the frog Philoria pughi consuming sibling embryos with delayed or failed development. Our observations indicate that additional nutrition is obtained from the ingested embryos, despite tadpoles of species of Philoria being capable of endotrophic development. This discovery should be considered when establishing captive breeding colonies for Philoria species and needs further investigation in wild populations.
Keywords: Anura, asynchronous development, behaviour, captive management, diet, predation, siblicide, threatened species.
References
Anstis M (2017) ‘Tadpoles and frogs of Australia.’ (New Holland Publishers Pty Limited: Sydney, Australia)Babbitt, KJ, and Meshaka, WE (2000). Benefits of eating conspecifics: effects of background diet on survival and metamorphosis in the cuban treefrog (Osteopilus septentrionalis). Copeia 2000, 469–474.
| Benefits of eating conspecifics: effects of background diet on survival and metamorphosis in the cuban treefrog (Osteopilus septentrionalis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Buxton, VL, and Sperry, JH (2017). Reproductive decisions in anurans: a review of how predation and competition affects the deposition of eggs and tadpoles. BioScience 67, 26–38.
| Reproductive decisions in anurans: a review of how predation and competition affects the deposition of eggs and tadpoles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crump, ML (1990). Possible enhancement of growth in tadpoles through cannibalism. Copeia 1990, 560–564.
| Possible enhancement of growth in tadpoles through cannibalism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Debavay, JM (1993). The developmental stages of the sphagnum frog, Kyarranus sphagnicolus Moore (Anura, Myobatrachidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 41, 151–201.
| The developmental stages of the sphagnum frog, Kyarranus sphagnicolus Moore (Anura, Myobatrachidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dugas, MB, McCormack, L, Gadau, A, and Martin, RA (2016). Choosy cannibals preferentially consume siblings with relatively low fitness prospects. The American Naturalist 188, 124–131.
| Choosy cannibals preferentially consume siblings with relatively low fitness prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fleming, RI, Mackenzie, CD, Cooper, A, and Kennedy, MW (2009). Foam nest components of the túngara frog: a cocktail of proteins conferring physical and biological resilience. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, 1787–1795.
| Foam nest components of the túngara frog: a cocktail of proteins conferring physical and biological resilience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Furness, AI, and Capellini, I (2019). The evolution of parental care diversity in amphibians. Nature Communications 10, 4709.
| The evolution of parental care diversity in amphibians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gosner, KL (1960). A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16, 183–190.
Gould, J (2021). Safety bubbles: a review of the proposed functions of froth nesting among anuran amphibians. Ecologies 2, 112–137.
| Safety bubbles: a review of the proposed functions of froth nesting among anuran amphibians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gould, J, Clulow, J, and Clulow, S (2020). Food, not friend: tadpoles of the sandpaper frog (Lechriodus fletcheri) cannibalise conspecific eggs as a food resource in ephemeral pools. Ethology 126, 486–491.
| Food, not friend: tadpoles of the sandpaper frog (Lechriodus fletcheri) cannibalise conspecific eggs as a food resource in ephemeral pools.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gould, J, Clulow, J, Rippon, P, Doody, JS, and Clulow, S (2021). Complex trade-offs in oviposition site selection in a cannibalistic frog. Animal Behaviour 175, 75–86.
| Complex trade-offs in oviposition site selection in a cannibalistic frog.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heard G, Bolitho L, Newell D, Hines H, McCall H, Smith J, Scheele B (2021) Post-fire impact assessment for priority frogs: northern Philoria. NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub Project 8.1.3 report, Brisbane.
Knowles, R, Mahony, M, Armstrong, J, and Donnellan, S (2004). Systematics of sphagnum frogs of the genus Philoria (Anura: Myobatrachidae) in eastern Australia, with the description of two new species. Records of the Australian Museum 56, 57–74.
| Systematics of sphagnum frogs of the genus Philoria (Anura: Myobatrachidae) in eastern Australia, with the description of two new species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lehtinen RM (2004) ‘Ecology and evolution of phytotem-breeding anurans.’ Miscellaneous Publications of the University of Michigan 193, pp. 1–9. (University of Michigan)
Magnusson, WE, and Hero, J-M (1991). Predation and the evolution of complex oviposition behaviour in Amazon rainforest frogs. Oecologia 86, 310–318.
| Predation and the evolution of complex oviposition behaviour in Amazon rainforest frogs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mock, DW (1984). Siblicidal aggression and resource monopolization in birds. Science 225, 731–733.
| Siblicidal aggression and resource monopolization in birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mock, DW, and Parker, GA (1998). Siblicide, family conflict and the evolutionary limits of selfishness. Animal Behaviour 56, 1–10.
| Siblicide, family conflict and the evolutionary limits of selfishness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Niehaus, AC, Wilson, RS, and Franklin, CE (2006). Short- and long-term consequences of thermal variation in the larval environment of anurans. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 686–692.
| Short- and long-term consequences of thermal variation in the larval environment of anurans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pfennig, DW (1992). Polyphenism in spadefoot toad tadpoles as a locally adjusted evolutionarily stable strategy. Evolution 46, 1408–1420.
| Polyphenism in spadefoot toad tadpoles as a locally adjusted evolutionarily stable strategy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pfennig, DW (1997). Kinship and cannibalism. BioScience 47, 667–675.
| Kinship and cannibalism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pfennig, DW, Reeve, HK, and Sherman, PW (1993). Kin recognition and cannibalism in spadefoot toad tadpoles. Animal Behaviour 46, 87–94.
| Kin recognition and cannibalism in spadefoot toad tadpoles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pfennig, DW, Sherman, PW, and Collins, JP (1994). Kin recognition and cannibalism in polyphenic salamanders. Behavioral Ecology 5, 225–232.
| Kin recognition and cannibalism in polyphenic salamanders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Poelman, EH, and Dicke, M (2007). Offering offspring as food to cannibals: oviposition strategies of Amazonian poison frogs (Dendrobates ventrimaculatus). Evolutionary Ecology 21, 215–227.
| Offering offspring as food to cannibals: oviposition strategies of Amazonian poison frogs (Dendrobates ventrimaculatus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Polis, GA (1981). The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12, 225–251.
| The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Polis, GA, and Myers, CA (1985). A survey of intraspecific predation among reptiles and amphibians. Journal of Herpetology 19, 99–107.
| A survey of intraspecific predation among reptiles and amphibians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Refsnider, JM, and Janzen, FJ (2010). Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41, 39–57.
| Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Resetarits, WJ, and Wilbur, HM (1989). Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70, 220–228.
| Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: role of predators and competitors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scheelings, TF (2015). Fighting extinction: zoos Victoria’s commitment to endangered herpetofauna. Journal of Herpetological Medicine and Surgery 25, 100–106.
| Fighting extinction: zoos Victoria’s commitment to endangered herpetofauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seymour, RS, Mahony, MJ, and Knowles, R (1995). Respiration of embryos and larvae of the terrestrially breeding frog Kyarranus loveridgei. Herpetologica 51, 369–376.
Skelly, DK (1996). Pond drying, predators, and the distribution of Pseudacris tadpoles. Copeia 1996, 599–605.
| Pond drying, predators, and the distribution of Pseudacris tadpoles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Touchon, JC, and Worley, JL (2015). Oviposition site choice under conflicting risks demonstrates that aquatic predators drive terrestrial egg-laying. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, 20150376.
| Oviposition site choice under conflicting risks demonstrates that aquatic predators drive terrestrial egg-laying.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walls, SC, and Blaustein, AR (1995). Larval marbled salamanders, Ambystoma opacum, eat their kin. Animal Behaviour 50, 537–545.
| Larval marbled salamanders, Ambystoma opacum, eat their kin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |