The use of hollows and dreys by the common ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) in different vegetation types
David B. Lindenmayer A C , Christopher MacGregor A , Alan Welsh B , Christine F. Donnelly A and Darren Brown AA Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
B Centre for Mathematics and Analysis, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: david.lindenmayer@anu.edu.au
Australian Journal of Zoology 56(1) 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO08054
Submitted: 17 September 2007 Accepted: 23 April 2008 Published: 29 July 2008
Abstract
Tree hollows are a key habitat component for a large number of Australian vertebrates and understanding how these resources are used is critical for developing successful management and conservation strategies for particular species or sets of species. Some hollow-using vertebrates are capable of using other kinds of nest sites. The common ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) is one of these species and it is known to use tree hollows and also to construct nests (dreys) made from sticks and leaves. Nest site selection by P. peregrinus may be a function of hollow availability. This proposition and several related questions were tested in a radio-tracking study that examined patterns of tree hollow and drey use by P. peregrinus in a range of vegetation types in Booderee National Park in Jervis Bay Territory. In addition, this study explored whether hollow and drey use was influenced by a wildfire that occurred in the study region in late 2003. It was found that use of hollows or dreys appeared to be a function of the availability of these resources. Most individuals were either primarily hollow users or primarily drey users. These patterns conformed to differences we recorded in hollow abundance between vegetation types: drey use was most pronounced in shrubland where hollows were rare and hollow use was most prevalent in forest where hollows were abundant. We found no evidence to suggest that hollow or drey use was influenced by fire. There was a trend pattern in our data suggesting that home-range size of P. peregrinus was larger in burnt versus unburnt sites but this effect was not statistically significant. Evidence was found that P. peregrinus selected particular kinds of trees as nest sites. Hollows in dead trees were more often used than those in living trees. Smaller dreys were most likely to be used. Several kinds of nest-selection effects that were contrary to the findings of studies of other arboreal marsupials were identified. These included more frequent use of smaller diameter trees with fewer cavities. The reasons for these unexpected results remain unclear. Findings such as those quantifying gender differences in the frequency of drey use, as well as marked between-vegetation-type differences in nest-type selection, indicate that nest use and nesting behaviour in P. peregrinus may be more complex than previously recognised. These findings also indicate that a deep understanding of the nesting biology of a species may require careful studies of both sexes, across a range of environments, and where disturbances have and have not occurred.
Acknowledgements
This study forms part of a major research partnership between the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, the Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community, the Department of Defence and The Australian National University. Mason Crane, Lachie McBurney, Damian Michael, Rebecca Montague-Drake and Rachel Muntz are critical contributors to the ANU field survey team. Key supporters of this work include Dr Martin Fortescue, Dr Nick Dexter, Peter Cochrane, Con Boekel and Scott Surridge from the federal Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. David Wilson, Earthwatch Institute volunteers as well as Ryan and Nina Lindenmayer assisted with some of the radio-tracking work reported in this paper. Oversight of animal handling and expert veterinary assistance was provided by Dr Karen Viggers. We thank Dr Sarah Munks and Dr Adrian Wayne for providing materials from their studies of the common ringtail and western ringtail possums respectively. Comments by Dr Sarah Munks and two anonymous referees greatly improved earlier versions of the manuscript.
Adams, E. S. (2001). Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, 277–303.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Debus, S. J. S. (1997). A survey of the raptors of Jervis Bay National Park. Australian Birds 30, 29–44.
Inions, G. B. , Tanton, M. T. , and Davey, S. M. (1989). Effects of fire on the availability of hollows in trees used by the common brushtail possum, Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr, 1792, and the ringtail possum, Pseudocheirus peregrinus Boddaerts, 1785. Australian Wildlife Research 16, 449–458.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lindenmayer, D. B. , and Cunningham, R. B. (1997). Patterns of co-occurrence among arboreal marsupials in the forests of central Victoria, south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 22, 340–346.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Munks, S. A. (1999). Nest use by the common ringtail possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus in coastal tee-tree on Flinders Island. Tasmanian Naturalist 121, 33–41.
Pahl, L. I. (1987). Survival, age determination and population age structure of the common ringtail possum, Pseudocheirus peregrinus, in a Eucalyptus woodland and a Leptospurmum thicket in southern Victoria. Australian Journal of Zoology 35, 625–639.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Russell, B. G. , Smith, B. , and Augee, M. L. (2003). Changes to a population of common ringtail possums (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) after bushfire. Wildlife Research 30, 389–396.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomson, J. A. , and Owen, W. H. (1964). A field study of the Australian ringtail possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus (Marsupialia, Phalangeridae). Ecological Monographs 34, 27–52.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |