Solo and duet calling in the pheasant coucal: sex and individual call differences in a nesting cuckoo with reversed size dimorphism
Golo Maurer A D , Claire Smith B , Marc Süsser C and Robert D. Magrath AA School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
B Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Scotland, 1 Atholl Crescent, Perth, PH1 5NG, United Kingdom.
C Naturschutzbund Deutschland, 10108 Berlin, Germany.
D Corresponding author. Email: golo.maurer@anu.edu.au
Australian Journal of Zoology 56(3) 143-149 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO08049
Submitted: 10 May 2008 Accepted: 4 September 2008 Published: 27 November 2008
Abstract
Duetting and female vocalisations have rarely been studied in tropical non-passerines. In coucals, a subfamily of nesting cuckoos, these behaviours have evolved under unusual conditions of male-biased parental care and reversed sexual size dimorphism. Here we provide the first detailed description of the structure and occurrence of sex-specific calls and duets in a monogamous coucal species, the pheasant coucal, Centropus phasianinus. Pheasant coucals of either sex use two types of far-reaching (>1 km) calls in their solo and duet displays: the ‘descending whoops’ call and, less frequently (25%), ‘scale’ calls. Both calls are series of very deep hooting notes that the larger females produce at lower frequency than the males (~326 versus 480 Hz). Descending whoops calls also vary among individuals but this difference is not consistent enough for individual identification. Most duets (63%) comprise a single scale call by each partner and the sexes start duets with equal frequency. Duetting triggers neighbouring pairs to duet too, suggesting a role in territory defence. Calling is most intense in the morning and early in the breeding season. The cryptic behaviour of coucals makes their calls an important tool for studies on their mating system, survey work and taxonomic research.
Acknowledgements
The help of O. Milenkaya, S. Musgrave, A. Quellmalz, S. Quinlan, M. Starling and B. Pitcher with the fieldwork and sound analysis was crucial to the success of the study. We also thank M. Hall, N. Langmore, M. Jennions and S. Cooney for comments on earlier drafts. The work was made possible through grants from the Stuart Leslie Bird Research Award, the Cayley Memorial Scholarship and the Ingram trust to GM and the Australian Research Council to RDM. Ethics permits for the study were granted by the Australian National University (F.BTZ.56.03) and Parks Northern Territory (# 16973).
Andersson, M. (1995). Evolution of reversed sex roles, sexual size dimorphism, and mating system in coucals (Centropodidae, Aves). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 54, 173–181.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fitch, W. T. (1999). Acoustic exaggeration of size in birds via tracheal elongation: comparative and theoretical analyses. Journal of Zoology 248, 31–48.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Krüger, O. , and Davies, N. B. (2002). The evolution of cuckoo parasitism: a comparative analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B 269, 375–381.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Langmore, N. E. (1998). Functions of duet and solo songs of female birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13, 136–140.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maurer, G. (2008). Who cares? Males provide most parental care in a monogamous nesting cuckoo. Ethology 114, 540–547.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mulder, R. A. , Bishop, H. , Cooper, M. , Dennis, S. , Koetsveld, M. , Marshall, J. , Saunders, B. L. , and Langmore, N. E. (2003). Alternate functions for duet and solo songs in magpie-larks, Grallina cyanoleuca. Australian Journal of Zoology 51, 25–30.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pratt, E. (1972). Some answers about coucal nesting. Sunbird 3, 19–25.
Wingfield, J. C. , Hegner, R. E. , Dufty, A. M. , and Ball, G. F. (1990). The challenge hypothesis – theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist 136, 829–846.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |