Genetic similarity, not male size, influences female mate choice in the agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis)
Marissa L. Parrott A B , Simon J. Ward A and Peter D. Temple-Smith AA Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: marissa@unimelb.edu.au
Australian Journal of Zoology 54(5) 319-323 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO06030
Submitted: 7 April 2006 Accepted: 8 September 2006 Published: 16 November 2006
Abstract
Our research investigates the effects of genetic relatedness between mates and male size on female mate choice in the agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis). Females were provided with a simultaneous choice between one large and one small male, with a minimum 5 g (~20% of male weight) difference between males, in specially designed mate-choice enclosures. Genetic relatedness between males and females was determined using highly polymorphic, species-specific, microsatellite markers. Male size did not influence mate choice, with approximately equal numbers of large and small males chosen. Females chose males that were more genetically dissimilar to themselves significantly more times and showed significantly more sexual and non-exploratory behaviours near the genetically dissimilar males. The results show that, when free female mate choice is possible, female agile antechinus choose males on the basis of genetic relatedness, rather than male size.
Acknowledgments
This research was generously funded by a Melbourne Research Ph.D. Scholarship and grants from the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment and Winifred Violet Scott Estate, a Loftus-Hills Memorial Fund Award and David Hay Postgraduate Writing-up Award to M. Parrott. We thank Lynne Selwood, Lee Drickamer and an anonymous referee for their valuable comments on the manuscript and Andrea Taylor, Sam Banks and Nicole DeRyck for assistance with genetic analyses. This research was carried out with ethics approval from the Animal Ethics Sub-Committee at the University of Melbourne and under a Department of Sustainability and Environment Wildlife permit.
Aeschlimann, P. B. , Haberli, M. A. , Reusch, T. B. H. , Boehm, T. , and Milinski, M. (2003). Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimise MHC allele number during mate selection. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 54, 119–126.
Banks, S. C. , Finlayson, G. R. , Lawson, S. J. , Lindenmayer, D. B. , Paetkau, D. , Ward, S. J. , and Taylor, A. C. (2005). The effects of habitat fragmentation due to forestry plantation establishment on the demography and genetic variation of a marsupial carnivore, Antechinus agilis. Biological Conservation 122, 581–597.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dickman, C. R. , Parnaby, H. E. , Crowther, M. S. , and King, D. H. (1998). Antechinus agilis (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae), a new species from the A. stuartii complex in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 46, 1–26.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Selwood, L. (1985). Synchronisation of oestrus, ovulation and birth in female Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia: Dasuridae). Australian Mammalogy 8, 91–96.
Shimmin, G. A. , Taggart, D. A. , and Temple-Smith, P. D. (2000). Sperm competition and genetic diversity in the agile antechinus (Dasyuridae: Antechinus agilis). Journal of Zoology 252, 343–350.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tregenza, T. , and Wedell, N. (2000). Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited review. Molecular Ecology 9, 1013–1027.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Wood, D. H. (1970). An ecological study of Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia) in a south-east Queensland rainforest. Australian Journal of Zoology 18, 185–207.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woolley, P. A. (1966). Reproduction in Antechinus spp., and other dasyurid marsupials. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 15, 281–294.
Yamazaki, K. , Boyse, E. A. , Mike, V. , Thaler, H. T. , Mathieson, B. J. , Abbott, J. , Boyse, J. , Zayas, Z. A. , and Thomas, L. (1976). Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. Journal of Experimental Medicine 144, 1324–1335.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Zeh, J. A. , and Zeh, D. W. (1996). The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 263, 1711–1717.
Zeh, J. A. , and Zeh, D. W. (2001). Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of multiple mating. Animal Behaviour 61, 1051–1063.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |