Structural ultraviolet ornamentation in the butterfly Hypolimnas bolina L. (Nymphalidae): visual, morphological and ecological properties
Darrell J. Kemp A B C and Joseph M. Macedonia BA School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia.
B School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: darrell.kemp@jcu.edu.au
Australian Journal of Zoology 54(4) 235-244 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO06005
Submitted: 11 January 2006 Accepted: 29 May 2006 Published: 11 August 2006
Abstract
Many butterflies exhibit structurally coloured wing patches that are stunningly bright and iridescent in their appearance, yet functionally obscure. These colours are often exaggerated in males, which suggests a sexually selected origin. We studied the visual properties, morphological basis, and interindividual variation of structural wing colouration in the common eggfly, Hypolimnas bolina L. (Nymphalidae). Males of this territorial species possess highly directional UV/violet colouration that fully overlaps smaller white patches on their dorsal wing surfaces. We sampled 56 males, including territorial residents and non-resident ‘floaters’ and assessed the properties of their structural colour using reflectance spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy. The patches reflect strongly in the UV range (300–400 nm), with a peak of ~360 nm, and the wing scales in these regions exhibit a ridge-lamellar surface architecture that has known function in other species as a multiple thin-film interference mirror. Peak UV brightness was variable, and both brightness and peak hue varied systematically across age classes. UV brightness was also related to hue independently of the age-related variation. Territorial residents possessed duller UV markings than their non-resident contemporaries, which is not consistent with exaggeration due to male–male competition. The high phenotypic variance is, however, consistent with a putative role for this male-limited trait as a sexual ornament.
Acknowledgments
We thank D. G. Stavenga for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by an Australian Research Council grant no. DP0557190 to DJK, and resources provided under the National Science Foundation grant no. 0316120 to R. L. Rutowski, whose support is greatly appreciated.
Brunton, C. F. A. (1998). The evolution of ultraviolet patterns in European Colias butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): a phylogeny using mitochondrial DNA. Heredity 80, 611–616.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eaton, M. D. , and Lanyon, S. M. (2003). The ubiquity of avian ultraviolet plumage reflectance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 270, 1721–1726.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ghiradella, H. , Aneshansley, D. , Eisner, T. , Silberglied, R. E. , and Hinton, H. E. (1972). Ultraviolet reflection of a male butterfly: interference color caused by thin-layer elaboration of wing scales. Science 178, 1214–1217.
McGraw, K. J. , MacKillop, E. A. , Dale, J. , and Hauber, M. E. (2002). Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 2343–2347.
Silberglied, R. E. , and Taylor, O. R. (1978). Ultraviolet reflection and its behavioral role in the courtship of the sulphur butterflies Colias eurytheme and C. philodice (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 3, 203–243.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |