Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Structural ultraviolet ornamentation in the butterfly Hypolimnas bolina L. (Nymphalidae): visual, morphological and ecological properties

Darrell J. Kemp A B C and Joseph M. Macedonia B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia.

B School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: darrell.kemp@jcu.edu.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 54(4) 235-244 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO06005
Submitted: 11 January 2006  Accepted: 29 May 2006   Published: 11 August 2006

Abstract

Many butterflies exhibit structurally coloured wing patches that are stunningly bright and iridescent in their appearance, yet functionally obscure. These colours are often exaggerated in males, which suggests a sexually selected origin. We studied the visual properties, morphological basis, and interindividual variation of structural wing colouration in the common eggfly, Hypolimnas bolina L. (Nymphalidae). Males of this territorial species possess highly directional UV/violet colouration that fully overlaps smaller white patches on their dorsal wing surfaces. We sampled 56 males, including territorial residents and non-resident ‘floaters’ and assessed the properties of their structural colour using reflectance spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy. The patches reflect strongly in the UV range (300–400 nm), with a peak of ~360 nm, and the wing scales in these regions exhibit a ridge-lamellar surface architecture that has known function in other species as a multiple thin-film interference mirror. Peak UV brightness was variable, and both brightness and peak hue varied systematically across age classes. UV brightness was also related to hue independently of the age-related variation. Territorial residents possessed duller UV markings than their non-resident contemporaries, which is not consistent with exaggeration due to male–male competition. The high phenotypic variance is, however, consistent with a putative role for this male-limited trait as a sexual ornament.


Acknowledgments

We thank D. G. Stavenga for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by an Australian Research Council grant no. DP0557190 to DJK, and resources provided under the National Science Foundation grant no. 0316120 to R. L. Rutowski, whose support is greatly appreciated.


References

Braby M. F. (2000). ‘Butterflies of Australia: their Identification, Biology and Distribution.’ (CSIRO: Canberra.)

Brunton, C. F. A. (1998). The evolution of ultraviolet patterns in European Colias butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): a phylogeny using mitochondrial DNA. Heredity 80, 611–616.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Burnham K. P., and Anderson D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information–Theoretic Approach.’ (Springer: New York.)

Common I. F. B., and Waterhouse D. F. (1981). ‘Butterflies of Australia.’ (CSIRO: Melbourne.)

Eaton, M. D. , and Lanyon, S. M. (2003). The ubiquity of avian ultraviolet plumage reflectance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 270, 1721–1726.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ghiradella H. (1998). Hairs, bristles and scales. In ‘Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates’. (Ed. M. Locke.) pp. 257–287. (Wiley-Liss: New York.)

Ghiradella, H. , Aneshansley, D. , Eisner, T. , Silberglied, R. E. , and Hinton, H. E. (1972). Ultraviolet reflection of a male butterfly: interference color caused by thin-layer elaboration of wing scales. Science 178, 1214–1217.
McCubbin C. (1971). ‘Australian Butterflies.’ (Nelson: Melbourne.)

McGraw, K. J. , MacKillop, E. A. , Dale, J. , and Hauber, M. E. (2002). Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 2343–2347.
Silberglied R. E. (1984). Visual communication and sexual selection among butterflies. In ‘The Biology of Butterflies’. (Eds R. I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery.) pp. 207–223. (Academic Press: London.)

Silberglied, R. E. , and Taylor, O. R. (1978). Ultraviolet reflection and its behavioral role in the courtship of the sulphur butterflies Colias eurytheme and C. philodice (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 3, 203–243.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wallace A. R. (1889). ‘Darwinism: an Exposition of the Theory of Natural Selection, with some of its Applications.’ (Macmillan & Co.: London.)