Operational field trialling of Felixer™ grooming traps for the control of feral cats in the Strzelecki Desert, Australia
R. D. Pedler
A * , J. L. Read A B C , K. E. Moseby A B , T. J. Hunt A , C. E. Lynch A , D. B. Cullen A , B. Coulter A , R. T. Kingsford A and R. S. West A
A
B
C
Abstract
Feral cats (Felis catus) have an impact on native wildlife populations around the world but are difficult to control because of their neophobic behaviours and preference for live prey over scavenging poisoned baits. Felixers™ address these challenges by squirting poison-gel directly onto feral cats, exploiting their fastidious oral grooming tendencies to facilitate poison ingestion.
This study trialled Felixers in a landscape-scale arid-ecosystem site to assess their capacity to sustainably manage cat populations in a semi-bounded in situ predator training area and to eradicate cat incursions into a feral-free safe haven. Specifically, the aims were to determine target specificity and firing rates; optimise installation sites to exploit cat behaviour and landscape features; assess the fate of individuals following Felixer interaction; and assess the overall cost, performance and efficacy of Felixers compared with conventional cat control methods.
Up to nine Felixers were simultaneously deployed across three trial periods, spanning 30 months (4,642 trap nights) in Sturt National Park in the Strzelecki Desert dunefields of Australia. Felixers were deployed within and outside of feral-free safe havens, at varying cat densities, with populations monitored through camera-trap activity indices and individual behaviour monitored through satellite tracking.
Felixers fired at 20.3–43.9% of cats that passed in front (292 of 1,144 cats), with the remainder failing to satisfy the discriminatory algorithm’s target criteria. The devices had 99.93% target specificity from 17,425 interactions with moving animals and objects. Overall cat activity was lower in a semi-bounded 10,400 ha landscape-scale area where Felixers were intensively used, relative to an adjacent unbounded area where no cat control was occurring, over a 12-month subset of the 30-month trial. Felixers also resolved one of two incursions by cats into a 2,000 ha safe haven. Optimisation of Felixer placement and upgrading of software drove improvements in technical reliability and target identification during the trial. Shortcomings included cost and high incidence of technical faults, causing significant downtime and requiring regular investment of field staff time for monitoring and resolution.
Felixers provide a safe tool for cat management and eradication at intensively managed conservation sites. Efficacy could be improved through reductions in cost and improvements in reliability.
Overall Felixers appear to be an effective tool for cat management, when used in an integrated approach.
Keywords: 1080, arid zone, feral cat, invasive species, pest control, reintroduced mammals, sodium fluoroacetate, trap.
References
Algar D, Angus GJ, Williams MR, Mellican AE (2007) Influence of bait type, weather and prey abundance on bait uptake by feral cats (Felis catus) on Peron Peninsula, Western Australia. Conservation Science Western Australia 6(1), 109-149.
| Google Scholar |
Augusteyn J, Nolan B (2022) Evaluating methods for controlling feral cats that minimise non-target impacts at Taunton National Park (Scientific). Ecological Management & Restoration 23(1), 43-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Chambers B, Dunlop J, Wayne A (2020) Felixer™ grooming trap non-target safety trial: Numbats. Unpublished report. Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Perth, WA, Australia. Available at https://library.dbca.wa.gov.au/#record/153154
Comer S, Clausen L, Cowen S, Pinder J, Thomas A, Burbidge AH, Tiller C, Algar D, Speldewinde P (2020) Integrating feral cat (Felis catus) control into landscape-scale introduced predator management to improve conservation prospects for threatened fauna: a case study from the south coast of Western Australia. Wildlife Research 47(8), 762-778.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cove MV, Herrmann V, Herrera DJ, Augustine BC, Flockhart DTT, McShea WJ (2023) Counting the capital’s cats: estimating drivers of abundance of free-roaming cats with a novel hierarchical model. Ecological Applications 33(2), e2790.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Doherty TS, Dickman CR, Johnson CN, Legge SM, Ritchie EG, Woinarski JCZ (2017) Impacts and management of feral cats Felis catus in Australia. Mammal Review 47(2), 83-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dundas SJ, Adams PJ, Fleming PA (2014) First in, first served: uptake of 1080 poison fox baits in south-west Western Australia. Wildlife Research 41(2), 117-126.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fancourt BA, Harry G, Speed J, Gentle MN (2022) Efficacy and safety of Eradicat® feral cat baits in eastern Australia: population impacts of baiting programmes on feral cats and non-target mammals and birds. Journal of Pest Science 95(1), 505-522.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fleming PJS, Allen BL, Allen LR, Ballard GA, Bengsen AJ, Gentle MN, McLeod LJ, Meek PD, Saunders GR (2014) Management of wild canids in Australia: free-ranging dogs and red foxes. In ‘Carnivores of Australia: past, present and future’. (Eds AS Glen, CR Dickman) pp. 105–149. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic, Australia)
Kingsford RT, West RS, Pedler RD, Keith DA, Moseby KE, Read JL, Letnic M, Leggett KEA, Ryall SR (2021) Strategic adaptive management planning—restoring a desert ecosystem by managing introduced species and native herbivores and reintroducing mammals. Conservation Science and Practice 3(2), e268.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kreplins TL, Kennedy MS, Adams PJ, Bateman PW, Dundas SD, Fleming PA (2018) Fate of dried meat baits aimed at wild dog (Canis familiaris) control. Wildlife Research 45(6), 528-538.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Legge S, Woinarski JCZ, Dickman CR, Doherty TS, McGregor H, Murphy BP (2020) Cat ecology, impacts and management in Australia. Wildlife Research 47(8), i-vi.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lenth R, Singmann H, Love J, Buerkner P, Herve M (2019) Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least squares means. (R-package 1.4.2). Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index
Lohr CA, Algar D (2020) Managing feral cats through an adaptive framework in an arid landscape. Science of The Total Environment 720, 137631.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
McGregor H, Read J, Johnson CN, Legge S, Hill B, Moseby K (2020) Edge effects created by fenced conservation reserves benefit an invasive mesopredator. Wildlife Research 47(8), 677-685.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McKenzie HW, Merrill EH, Spiteri RJ, Lewis MA (2012) How linear features alter predator movement and the functional response. Interface Focus 2(2), 205-216.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Medina FM, Bonnaud E, Vidal E, Tershy BR, Zavaleta ES, Josh Donlan C, Keitt BS, Le Corre M, Horwath SV, Nogales M (2011) A global review of the impacts of invasive cats on island endangered vertebrates. Global Change Biology 17(11), 3503-3510.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Ballard G-A, Fleming PJS (2015) The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37(1), 13-22.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moseby KE, McGregor HM (2022) Feral cats use fine scale prey cues and microhabitat patches of dense vegetation when hunting prey in arid Australia. Global Ecology and Conservation 35, e02093.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moseby KE, Read JL, Galbraith B, Munro N, Newport J, Hill BM (2011) The use of poison baits to control feral cats and red foxes in arid South Australia II. Bait type, placement, lures and non-target uptake. Wildlife Research 38(4), 350-358.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moseby KE, Blumstein DT, Letnic M (2016) Harnessing natural selection to tackle the problem of prey naïveté. Evolutionary Applications 9(2), 334-343.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Moseby KE, McGregor H, Read JL (2020a) Effectiveness of the Felixer grooming trap for the control of feral cats: a field trial in arid South Australia. Wildlife Research 47(8), 599-609.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moseby KE, McGregor H, Hill BM, Read JL (2020b) Exploring the internal and external wildlife gradients created by conservation fences. Conservation Biology 34(1), 220-231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Moseby K, Hodgens P, Bannister H, Mooney P, Brandle R, Lynch C, Young C, Jansen J, Jensen M (2021) The ecological costs and benefits of a feral cat poison-baiting programme for protection of reintroduced populations of the western quoll and brushtail possum. Austral Ecology 46(8), 1366-1382.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Newsome AE, Catling PC, Cooke BD, Smyth R (2001) Two ecological universes separated by the Dingo Barrier Fence in semi-arid Australia: interactions between landscapes, herbivory and carnivory, with and without dingoes. The Rangeland Journal 23(1), 71-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nogales M, Vidal E, Medina FM, Bonnaud E, Tershy BR, Campbell KJ, Zavaleta ES (2013) Feral cats and biodiversity conservation: the urgent prioritization of island management. BioScience 63(10), 804-810.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pedler RD, West RS, Read JL, Moseby KE, Letnic M, Keith DA, Leggett KD, Ryall SR, Kingsford RT (2018) Conservation challenges and benefits of multispecies reintroductions to a national park – a case study from New South Wales, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 24(4), 397-408.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pedler R, Read J, Moseby K, Kingsford R, West R (2021) Proactive management of kangaroos for conservation and ecosystem restoration – Wild Deserts, Sturt National Park, NSW. Ecological Management & Restoration 22(S1), 90-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Read J, Gigliotti F, Darby S, Lapidge S (2014) Dying to be clean: pen trials of novel cat and fox control devices. International Journal of Pest Management 60(3), 166-172.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Read JL, Bengsen AJ, Meek PD, Moseby KE (2015) How to snap your cat: optimum lures and their placement for attracting mammalian predators in arid Australia. Wildlife Research 42(1), 1-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Read JL, Bowden T, Hodgens P, Hess M, McGregor H, Moseby K (2019) Target specificity of the felixer grooming “trap”. Wildlife Society Bulletin 43(1), 112-120.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rickards H, Read JL, Johnson CN, Jones ME, Pauza MD, Bentley J, Sculthorpe A, Humphrey M, Hamer R (2023) Is the Felixer cat control device safe for marsupial carnivores? Wildlife Research 50(5), 356-365.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ryan-Schofield NL, Read JL, McGregor HW, Mcwhorter TJ, Moseby KE (2024) Evasive invasives? Implications of neophobia for feral cat (Felis catus) control. Wildlife Society Bulletin 48(3), e1536.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sparkes J, Fleming PJS (2023) Observer differences in individual identification of feral cats from camera trap images. Australian Mammalogy 45(1), 32-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tuck C, Hague R (2006) The pivotal role of rapid manufacturing in the production of cost-effective customised products. International Journal of Mass Customisation 1(2/3), 360-373.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
West R, Letnic M, Blumstein DT, Moseby KE (2018) Predator exposure improves anti-predator responses in a threatened mammal. Journal of Applied Ecology 55(1), 147-156.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Whittington J, St. Clair CC, Mercer G (2005) Spatial responses of wolves to roads and trails in Mountain Valleys. Ecological Applications 15(2), 543-553.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
