Taylor’s law and quasi-experimental hunting of invasive wild boar and axis deer in a protected area of north-eastern Argentina
Ricardo E. Gürtler A B * , Gabriela Nicosia A B , Aldo Delaloye C , Aristóbulo A. Maranta D , María C. Li Puma D and Joel E. Cohen E F GA
B
C
D
E
F
G
Abstract
Overabundant ungulate populations frequently cause ecological and economic damage and are difficult to control. Sustained culling efforts at El Palmar National Park have largely reduced wild boar (Sus scrofa) numbers and damage but have failed to halt the ever-increasing abundance of axis deer (Axis axis) for undefined reasons. Multi-year camera-trap surveys indicated a mismatch between deer core activity and the usual timing of hunting sessions.
We used the spatial and temporal forms of Taylor’s law (TL, a power relationship between the sample mean and sample variance) to test whether overnight hunting sessions are more effective for culling axis deer and wild boar than are daytime sessions, and assessed whether they modify ungulate harvest composition.
We implemented a quasi-experimental trial (i.e. ‘experiments in which units are not assigned to conditions randomly’), including nine alternating blocks of four to seven hunting sessions each (overnight or daytime) in which an average of 42 hunter groups performed controlled shooting over bait from fixed elevated blinds, retrieved, sexed, weighed and measured all quarry.
The relationship between the mean and variance of ungulate crude catch per hunting-party session and crude catch per unit effort (CPUE, where effort is measured in hunting-party hours) by hunting shift satisfied the spatial and temporal TL. On average, axis deer catch was 2.39–2.61 times greater in overnight than in daytime sessions, whereas CPUE indices were 1.54–1.73 times greater. For wild boar, overnight sessions returned catches similar to (0.94–1.03×), and a significantly lower CPUE (0.63–0.67×) than for daytime sessions. The harvest indices were substantially aggregated in daytime sessions only, and were consistently skewed towards yearlings or subadults and males, especially among adult deer. Overnight sessions culled proportionally more adults and more pregnant hinds and sows than did daytime sessions, and significantly heavier deer and wild boar males.
Overnight sessions were substantially more effective for culling deer than were daytime sessions, and selected for individuals with greater fitness. Stage- and male-skewed harvest most likely explains the steady population growth of axis deer despite increasing hunting pressure over a decade.
Adjusting the schedule of hunting sessions to time intervals of peak ungulate activity substantially increased the efficiency of management efforts in terms of removal rates and reproductive value of the culled specimens.
Keywords: abundance, Axis axis, controlled shooting, invasive exotic species, population dynamics, Sus scrofa, Taylor’s law, ungulates, wildlife management.
References
Ballari SA, Cirignoli S, Winter M, Cuevas MF, Merino ML, Monteverde M, Barrios-García MN, Sanguinetti J, Lartigau B, Kin MS, Relva MA (2019) Sus scrofa. In ‘Categorización 2019 de los mamíferos de Argentina según su riesgo de extinción. Lista Roja de los mamíferos de Argentina’. (Ed Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos (SAREM): Puerto Madryn, Argentina). Available at http://cma.sarem.org.ar/es/especie-exotica/sus-scrofa
Baur S, Peters W, Oettenheym T, Menzel A (2021) Weather conditions during hunting season affect the number of harvested roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Ecology and Evolution 11, 10178-10191.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bengsen AJ, Forsyth DM, Harris S, Latham ADM, McLeod SR, Pople A (2020) A systematic review of ground-based shooting to control overabundant mammal populations. Wildlife Research 47, 197-207.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A (2017) Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology 46, 348-355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bieber C, Ruf T (2005) Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 1203-1213.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Burgueño M, Rodríguez-Planes LI, Nicosia G, de Miguel A, Szpilbarg S, Gürtler RE (2022) Does the interface with plantation forests provide suitable habitat for axis deer (Axis axis) to avoid systematic hunting pressure in a protected area of north-eastern Argentina? European Journal of Wildlife Research 68, 6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Campbell TA, Long DB (2009) Feral swine damage and damage management in forested ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 257, 2319-2326.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Carpio AJ, Apollonio M, Acevedo P (2021) Wild ungulate overabundance in Europe: contexts, causes, monitoring and management recommendations. Mammal Review 51, 95-108.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Centore L, Ugarković D, Scaravelli D, Safner T, Pandurić K, Šprem N (2018) Locomotor activity pattern of two recently introduced non-native ungulate species in a Mediterranean habitat. Folia Zoologica 67, 17-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cohen JE, Xu M, Brunborg H (2013a) Taylor’s law applies to spatial variation in a human population. Genus 69, 25-60.
| Google Scholar |
Cohen JE, Xu M, Schuster WSF (2013b) Stochastic multiplicative population growth predicts and interprets Taylor’s power law of fluctuation scaling. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280, 20122955.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cohen JE, Lai J, Coomes DA, Allen RB (2016) Taylor’s law and related allometric power laws in New Zealand mountain beech forests: the roles of space, time and environment. Oikos 125, 1342-1357.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cohen JE, Rodríguez-Planes LI, Gaspe MS, Cecere MC, Cardinal MV, Gürtler RE (2017a) Chagas disease vector control and Taylor’s law. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 11, e0006092.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cohen JE, Poulin R, Lagrue C (2017b) Linking parasite populations in hosts to parasite populations in space through Taylor’s law and the negative binomial distribution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, E47-E56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Comte S, Thomas E, Bengsen AJ, Bennett A, Davis NE, Brown D, Forsyth DM (2023) Cost-effectiveness of volunteer and contract ground-based shooting of sambar deer in Australia. Wildlife Research 50, 642-656.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cox TE, Paine D, O’Dwyer-Hall E, Matthews R, Blumson T, Florance B, Fielder K, Tarran M, Korcz M, Wiebkin A, Hamnett PW, Bradshaw CJA, Page B (2023) Thermal aerial culling for the control of vertebrate pest populations. Scientific Reports 13, 10063.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cuevas MF, Ballari SA, Ojeda RA, Skewes O (2021) Wild boar invasion in Argentina and Chile: ecology, impacts, and distribution. In ‘Biological invasions in the South American anthropocene: global causes and local impacts’. (Eds FM Jaksic, SA Castro) pp. 203–229. (Springer: Cham, CH) 10.1007/978-3-030-56379-0_10
Davis NE, Bennett A, Forsyth DM, Bowman DMJS, Lefroy EC, Wood SW, Woolnough AP, West P, Hampton JO, Johnson CN (2016) A systematic review of the impacts and management of introduced deer (family Cervidae) in Australia. Wildlife Research 43, 515-532.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Duckworth JW, Kumar NS, Anwarul Islam M, Sagar Baral H, Timmins R (2015) Chital Axis axis. In ‘The IUCN red list of threatened species 2015’. e.T41783A22158006. (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) Available at https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/41783/22158006.
Dzięciołowski RM, Clarke CMH, Fredric BJ (1990) Growth of feral pigs in New Zealand. Acta Theriologica 35, 77-88.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Döring TF, Knapp S, Cohen JE (2015) Taylor’s power law and the stability of crop yields. Field Crops Research 183, 294-302.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Elliott JR, Harms TM (2023) Weather conditions affecting white-tailed deer harvest in Iowa. The Journal of Wildlife Management 87, e22458.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Forsyth DM, Ramsey DSL, Veltman CJ, Allen RB, Allen WJ, Barker RJ, Jacobson CL, Nicol SJ, Richardson SJ, Todd CR (2013) When deer must die: large uncertainty surrounds changes in deer abundance achieved by helicopter- and ground-based hunting in New Zealand forests. Wildlife Research 40, 447-458.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fryxell JM, Mercer WE, Gellately RB (1988) Population dynamics of Newfoundland moose using cohort analysis. The Journal of Wildlife Management 52, 14-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gogan PJP, Barret RH, Shook WW, Kucera TE (2001) Control of ungulate numbers in a protected area. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 1074-1088.
| Google Scholar |
Graf W, Nichols L (1966) The axis deer in Hawaii. The Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 63, 629-734 Available at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/18553.
| Google Scholar |
Gürtler RE, Cohen JE (2022) Invasive axis deer and wild boar in a protected area in Argentina, controlled hunting, and Taylor’s law. Wildlife Research 49, 111-128.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gürtler RE, Martín Izquierdo V, Gil G, Cavicchia M, Maranta A (2017) Coping with wild boar in a conservation area: impacts of a 10-year management control program in north-eastern Argentina. Biological Invasions 19, 11-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gürtler RE, Rodríguez-Planes LI, Gil G, Izquierdo VM, Cavicchia M, Maranta A (2018) Differential long-term impacts of a management control program of axis deer and wild boar in a protected area of north-eastern Argentina. Biological Invasions 20, 1431-1447.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gürtler RE, Ballari SA, Maranta AA, Cohen JE (2023) Controlling the abundance of invasive exotic wild boar (Sus scrofa) improves palm-tree conservation in north-eastern Argentina. European Journal of Wildlife Research 69, 40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hampton JO, Bengsen AJ, Pople A, Brennan M, Leeson M, Forsyth DM (2022) Animal welfare outcomes of helicopter-based shooting of deer in Australia. Wildlife Research 49, 264-273.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hampton JO, MacKenzie DI, Forsyth DM (2023) Animal welfare outcomes of professional vehicle-based shooting of peri-urban rusa deer in Australia. Wildlife Research 50, 603-616.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hanson LB, Mitchell MS, Grand JB, Jolley DB, Sparklin BD, Ditchkoff SS (2009) Effect of experimental manipulation on survival and recruitment of feral pigs. Wildlife Research 36, 185-191.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hegel CGZ, Faria GMM, Ribeiro B, Salvador CH, Rosa C, Pedrosa F, Batista G, Sales LP, Wallau M, Fornel R, Aguiar LMS (2022) Invasion and spatial distribution of wild pigs (Sus scrofa L.) in Brazil. Biological Invasions 24, 3681-3692.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hess SC, Judge SW (2021) Modeling scenarios for the management of axis deer in Hawai‘i. Pacific Science 75, 561-574.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hess SC, Muise J, Schipper J (2015) Anatomy of an eradication effort: removing Hawaii’s illegally introduced deer. The Wildlife Professional 9, 40-43.
| Google Scholar |
Hone J (2002) Feral pigs in Namadgi National Park, Australia: dynamics, impacts and management. Biological Conservation 105, 231-242.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hone J, Duncan RP, Forsyth DM (2010) Estimates of maximum annual population growth rates (rm) of mammals and their application in wildlife management. Journal of Applied Ecology 47, 507-514.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hone J, Drake VA, Krebs CJ (2017) The effort-outcomes relationship in applied ecology: evaluation and implications. BioScience 67, 845-852.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ikeda T, Takahashi H, Igota H, Matsuura Y, Azumaya M, Yoshida T, Kaji K (2019) Effects of culling intensity on diel and seasonal activity patterns of sika deer (Cervus nippon). Scientific Reports 9, 17205.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Johann F, Handschuh M, Linderoth P, Dormann CF, Arnold J (2020) Adaptation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) activity in a human-dominated landscape. BMC Ecology 20, 4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Keuling O, Massei G (2021) Does hunting affect the behavior of wild pigs? Human–Wildlife Interactions 15, 11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Keuling O, Baubet E, Duscher A, Ebert C, Fischer C, Monaco A, Podgórski T, Prevot C, Ronnenberg K, Sodeikat G, Stier N, Thurfjell H (2013) Mortality rates of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in central Europe. European Journal of Wildlife Research 59, 805-814.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lewis JS, Spaulding S, Swanson H, Keeley W, Gramza AR, VandeWoude S, Crooks KR (2021) Human activity influences wildlife populations and activity patterns: implications for spatial and temporal refuges. Ecosphere 12, e03487.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Marchand P, Garel M, Bourgoin G, Dubray D, Maillard D, Loison A (2014) Impacts of tourism and hunting on a large herbivore’s spatio-temporal behavior in and around a French protected area. Biological Conservation 177, 1-11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Markina FA, Sáez-Royuela C, De Garnica R (2004) Physical development of wild boar in the Cantabric Mountains, Álava, northern Spain. Galemys 16, 17-26.
| Google Scholar |
Massei G, Roy S, Bunting R (2011) Too many hogs? A review of methods to mitigate impact by wild boar and feral hogs. Human–Wildlife Interactions 5, 10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mcilroy JC, Saillard RJ (1989) The effect of hunting with dogs on the numbers and movements of feral pigs, Sus-scrofa, and the subsequent success of poisoning exercises in Namadgi-National-Park, Act. Australian Wildlife Research 16, 353-363.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McShea WJ (2012) Ecology and management of white-tailed deer in a changing world. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1249, 45-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Merli E, Grignolio S, Marcon A, Apollonio M (2017) Wild boar under fire: the effect of spatial behaviour, habitat use and social class on hunting mortality. Journal of Zoology 303, 155-164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Milner JM, Nilsen EB, Andreassen HP (2007) Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores. Conservation Biology 21, 36-47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Milner JM, Bonenfant C, Mysterud A (2011) Hunting Bambi – evaluating the basis for selective harvesting of juveniles. European Journal of Wildlife Research 57, 565-574.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moe SR, Wegge P (1994) Spacing behaviour and habitat use of axis deer (Axis axis) in lowland Nepal. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72, 1735-1744.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Moretti M (1995) Biometric data growth rates of mountain population of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.), Ticino, Switzerland. Journal of Mountain Ecology (Ibex) 3, 56-59.
| Google Scholar |
Mysterud A (2011) Selective harvesting of large mammals: how often does it result in directional selection? Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 827-834.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nicosia G, Rodríguez-Planes LI, Maranta AA, Morel A, Gürtler RE (2021) Combining citizen science and recreational hunters to monitor exotic ungulates and native wildlife in a protected area of northeastern Argentina. Biological Invasions 23, 3687-3702.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nicosia G, de Miguel A, Fumagalli A, Diego-Arnaldo RB, Gürtler RE (2023) Influence of COVID-19 lockdown and hunting disturbance on the activity patterns of exotic wild boar (Sus scrofa) and axis deer (Axis axis) in a protected area of northeastern Argentina. European Journal of Wildlife Research 69, 96.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nugent G, McShea WJ, Parkes J, Woodley S, Waithaka J, Moro J, Gutierrez R, Azorit C, Mendez Guerrero F, Flueck WT, Smith-Flueck JM (2011) Policies and management of overabundant deer (native or exotic) in protected areas. Animal Production Science 51, 384-389.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pople A, Amos M, Brennan M (2023) Population dynamics of chital deer (Axis axis) in northern Queensland: effects of drought and culling. Wildlife Research 50, 728-745.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rajawat RS, Chandra S (2020) Activity pattern of chital (Axis axis) in Mukandra Hills Tiger Reserve, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 46, 173-176.
| Google Scholar |
Ramesh T, Sankar K, Qureshi Q, Kalle R (2012) Group size, sex and age composition of chital (Axis axis) and sambar (Rusa unicolor) in a deciduous habitat of Western Ghats. Mammalian Biology 77, 53-59.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Riley SJ, Decker DJ, Enck JW, Curtis PD, Lauber TB, Brown TL (2003) Deer populations up, hunter populations down: implications of interdependence of deer and hunter population dynamics on management. Écoscience 10, 455-461.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Saïd S, Tolon V, Brandt S, Baubet E (2012) Sex effect on habitat selection in response to hunting disturbance: the study of wild boar. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58, 107-115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Solberg EJ, Loison A, Sæther B-E, Strand O (2000) Age-specific harvest mortality in a Norwegian moose Alces alces population. Wildlife Biology 6, 41-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stankowich T (2008) Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta-analysis. Biological Conservation 141, 2159-2173.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Taylor LR (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189, 732-735.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Taylor LR, Perry JN, Woiwod IP, Taylor RAJ (1988) Specificity of the spatial power-law exponent in ecology and agriculture. Nature 332(21), 721-722.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tellarini JF, Cirignoli S, Aprile G, Sobral Zotta N, Varela D, Maranta A, Fracassi N, Lartigau B, Gómez Villafañe I (2019) Axis axis. In ‘Categorización 2019 de los mamíferos de Argentina según su riesgo de extinción. Lista Roja de los mamíferos de Argentina’. (Ed Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos (SAREM): Puerto Madryn, Argentina). Available at http://cma.sarem.org.ar/es/especie-exotica/axis-axis
The Deer Initiative (2010) Night shooting. Deer best practice guides, England and Wales. The Deer Initiative. (Ed. J Cordery). Available at http://www.thedeerinitiative.co.uk/best_practice/legislation_health_and_safety_and_welfare.php [accessed 29 August 2023]
Thurfjell H, Spong G, Ericsson G (2014) Effects of weather, season, and daylight on female wild boar movement. Acta Theriologica 59, 467-472.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tolon V, Dray S, Loison A, Zeileis A, Fischer C, Baubet E (2009) Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear. Canadian Journal of Zoology 87, 1129-1137.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tucker MA, Schipper AM, Adams TSF, Attias N, Avgar T, Babic NL, Barker KJ, Bastille-Rousseau G, Behr DM, Belant JL, Beyer DE, Jr, et al. (2023) Behavioral responses of terrestrial mammals to COVID-19 lockdowns. Science 380, 1059-1064.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
van Doormaal N, Ohashi H, Koike S, Kaji K (2015) Influence of human activities on the activity patterns of Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) in central Japan. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61, 517-527.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Van Etten RC, Switzenberg DF, Eberhardt L (1965) Controlled deer hunting in a square-mile enclosure. The Journal of Wildlife Management 29, 59-73.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Vetter SG, Puskas Z, Bieber C, Ruf T (2020) How climate change and wildlife management affect population structure in wild boars. Scientific Reports 10, 7298.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Watter K, Baxter GS, Pople A, Murray PJ (2020) Dietary overlap between cattle and chital in the Queensland dry tropics. The Rangeland Journal 42, 221-225.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |