Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Understanding the zoonotic pathogen, Coxiella burnetii in Australian fur seal breeding colonies through environmental DNA and genotyping

Brett R. Gardner https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2968-1850 A * , John P. Y. Arnould B , Jasmin Hufschmid A , Rebecca R. McIntosh C , Aymeric Fromant https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3024-7659 B D , Mythili Tadepalli E and John Stenos E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee Vic. 3030, Australia.

B School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia.

C Conservation Department, Philip Island Nature Parks, PO Box 97, Cowes, Vic. 3922, Australia.

D Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, Villiers-en-Bois 79360, France.

E Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory, University Hospital Geelong, Bellerine Street, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia.

* Correspondence to: gardner.b@unimelb.edu.au

Handling Editor: Catarina Campos Ferreira

Wildlife Research 50(10) 840-848 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR22136
Submitted: 6 August 2022  Accepted: 29 November 2022   Published: 20 December 2022

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context: Coxiella burnetii is suspected as a novel pathogen contributing to decreased pup production in Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus). It has recently been described from a single breeding colony in Bass Strait, has previously been associated with two decreasing populations of northern hemisphere pinnipeds and is a known reproductive pathogen. Data around its disease ecology in marine mammals are sparse.

Aims: To determine whether environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used to survey for C. burnetii in Australian fur seal breeding colonies. To determine whether C. burnetii in Australian fur seals is the same genotype as terrestrial Australian C. burnetii.

Methods: Soil samples were collected from Kanowna Island and Seal Rocks. Placental samples were collected from Kanowna Island. Soil was evaluated for eDNA using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for com1 gene. Placental samples were evaluated with com1, htpAB and IS1111 markers. Multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeats analysis for three microsatellite loci (ms-24, ms-28 and ms-33) was used to determine relatedness to Australian C. burnetii genotypes.

Key results: eDNA results varied between pre-and post-pupping at Seal Rocks. When targeting the com1 gene, the post-pupping prevalence at Kanowna Island and Seal Rocks was 59.6% and 90%, respectively. eDNA PCR inhibition of samples was low at 1.9%. There was very poor, sporadic to absent IS1111 amplification in placental samples. The com1 and htpAB qPCRs had an overall prevalence across placental samples of 39.2% and 56.7% respectively. In 90.1% of placental samples (n = 11), the ms-28 locus amplified. Neither ms-24 nor ms-33 amplified.

Conclusions: eDNA is an effective tool to survey Australian fur seal breeding colonies in the post-pupping period for C. burnetii. The prevalence appears to be much higher in the Seal Rocks colony than in the Kanowna Island colony. It appears that this is not a terrestrial Australian genotype but rather closely related to genotypes detected in marine mammals in the northern hemisphere.

Implications: This research significantly expands our ability to survey for C. burnetii in Australian fur seals and other marine mammals. It highlights knowledge gaps in our understanding of the disease ecology and phylogeny of C. burnetii in marine mammals.

Keywords: breeding biology, conservation ecology, disease, ecosystem health, epidemiology, fertility, infectious disease, islands, microbiology, reproduction.


References

Abeykoon Mudiyanselage, HA, Clark, NJ, Soares Magalhaes, RJ, Vincent, GA, Stevenson, MA, Firestone, SM, and Wiethoelter, AK (2021a). Coxiella burnetii in the environment: a systematic review and critical appraisal of sampling methods. Zoonoses and Public Health 68, 165–181.
Coxiella burnetii in the environment: a systematic review and critical appraisal of sampling methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Abeykoon Mudiyanselage, HA, Hou, K, Vincent, GA, Stevenson, MA, Firestone, SM, and Wiethoelter, A (2021b). Environmental contamination of Coxiella burnetii in and around an endemically infected goat farm. International Journal of Epidemiology 50, dyab168.007.
Environmental contamination of Coxiella burnetii in and around an endemically infected goat farm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Agerholm, JS (2013). Coxiella burnetii associated reproductive disorders in domestic animals: a critical review. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 55, 13.
Coxiella burnetii associated reproductive disorders in domestic animals: a critical review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Angelakis, E, Million, M, D’Amato, F, Rouli, L, Richet, H, Stein, A, Rolain, J-M, and Raoult, D (2013). Q fever and pregnancy: disease, prevention, and strain specificity. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 32, 361–368.
Q fever and pregnancy: disease, prevention, and strain specificity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arricau-Bouvery, N, Hauck, Y, Bejaoui, A, Frangoulidis, D, Bodier, CC, Souriau, A, Meyer, H, Neubauer, H, Rodolakis, A, and Vergnaud, G (2006). Molecular characterization of Coxiella burnetii isolates by infrequent restriction site-PCR and MLVA typing. BMC Microbiology 6, 38.
Molecular characterization of Coxiella burnetii isolates by infrequent restriction site-PCR and MLVA typing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bond, KA, Franklin, L, Sutton, B, Stevenson, MA, and Firestone, SM (2018). Review of 20 years of human acute Q fever notifications in Victoria, 1994–2013. Australian Veterinary Journal 96, 223–230.
Review of 20 years of human acute Q fever notifications in Victoria, 1994–2013.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Bruin, A, Janse, I, Koning, M, de Heer, L, van der Plaats, RQJ, van Leuken, JPG, and van Rotterdam, BJ (2013). Detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA in the environment during and after a large Q fever epidemic in the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Microbiology 114, 1395–1404.
Detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA in the environment during and after a large Q fever epidemic in the Netherlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Duncan, C, Kersh, GJ, Spraker, T, Patyk, KA, Fitzpatrick, KA, Massung, RF, and Gelatt, T (2012). Coxiella burnetii in northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) placentas from St. Paul Island, Alaska. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 12, 192–195.
Coxiella burnetii in northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) placentas from St. Paul Island, Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Duncan, C, Savage, K, Williams, M, Dickerson, B, Kondas, AV, Fitzpatrick, KA, Guerrero, JL, Spraker, T, and Kersh, GJ (2013). Multiple strains of Coxiella burnetii are present in the environment of St. Paul Island, Alaska. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 60, 345–350.
Multiple strains of Coxiella burnetii are present in the environment of St. Paul Island, Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gardner, BR, Stenos, J, Hufschmid, J, Arnould, JPY, McIntosh, RR, Tadepalli, M, Tolpinrud, A, Marenda, M, Lynch, M, and Stent, A (2022). An old pathogen in a new environment: implications of Coxiella burnetii in Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus). Frontiers in Marine Science 9, 809075.
An old pathogen in a new environment: implications of Coxiella burnetii in Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Geeson, JJ, Hobday, AJ, Speakman, CN, and Arnould, JPY (2022). Environmental influences on breeding biology and pup production in Australian fur seals. Royal Society Open Science 9, 211399.
Environmental influences on breeding biology and pup production in Australian fur seals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

González-Barrio, D, and Ruiz-Fons, F (2019). Coxiella burnetii in wild mammals: a systematic review. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 66, 662–671.
Coxiella burnetii in wild mammals: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kersh, GJ, Lambourn, DM, Raverty, SA, Fitzpatrick, KA, Self, JS, Akmajian, AM, Jeffries, SJ, Huggins, J, Drew, CP, Zaki, SR, and Massung, RF (2012). Coxiella burnetii infection of marine mammals in the pacific northwest, 1997–2010. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 48, 201–206.
Coxiella burnetii infection of marine mammals in the pacific northwest, 1997–2010.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McIntosh, RR, Sorrell, KJ, Thalmann, S, Mitchell, A, Gray, R, Schinagl, H, Arnould, JP, Dann, P, and Kirkwood, R (2022). Sustained reduction in numbers of Australian fur seal pups: implications for future population monitoring. PLoS ONE 17, e0265610.
Sustained reduction in numbers of Australian fur seal pups: implications for future population monitoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Minor, C, Kersh, GJ, Gelatt, T, Kondas, AV, Pabilonia, KL, Weller, CB, Dickerson, BR, and Duncan, CG (2013). Coxiella burnetii in northern fur seals and Steller sea lions of Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 49, 441–446.
Coxiella burnetii in northern fur seals and Steller sea lions of Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rodríguez-Lázaro, D, Hernández, M, Scortti, M, Esteve, T, Vázquez-Boland, JA, and Pla, M (2004). Quantitative detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua by real-time PCR: assessment of hly, iap, and lin02483 targets and amplifluor technology. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70, 1366–1377.
Quantitative detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua by real-time PCR: assessment of hly, iap, and lin02483 targets and amplifluor technology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Roest, H-J, van Gelderen, B, Dinkla, A, Frangoulidis, D, van Zijderveld, F, Rebel, J, and van Keulen, L (2012). Q fever in pregnant goats: pathogenesis and excretion of Coxiella burnetii. PLoS ONE 7, e48949.
Q fever in pregnant goats: pathogenesis and excretion of Coxiella burnetii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schneeberger, PM, Hermans, MHA, van Hannen, EJ, Schellekens, JJA, Leenders, ACAP, and Wever, PC (2010). Real-time PCR with serum samples is indispensable for early diagnosis of acute Q fever. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 17, 286–290.
Real-time PCR with serum samples is indispensable for early diagnosis of acute Q fever.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tilburg, JJHC, Rossen, JWA, van Hannen, EJ, Melchers, WJG, Hermans, MHA, van de Bovenkamp, J, Roest, HJIJ, de Bruin, A, Nabuurs-Franssen, MH, Horrevorts, AM, and Klaassen, CHW (2012). Genotypic diversity of Coxiella burnetii in the 2007-2010 Q fever outbreak episodes in the Netherlands. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 50, 1076–1078.
Genotypic diversity of Coxiella burnetii in the 2007-2010 Q fever outbreak episodes in the Netherlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tozer, SJ, Lambert, SB, Strong, CL, Field, HE, Sloots, TP, and Nissen, MD (2014). Potential animal and environmental sources of Q fever infection for humans in Queensland. Zoonoses and Public Health 61, 105–112.
Potential animal and environmental sources of Q fever infection for humans in Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vincent, G, Stenos, J, Latham, J, Fenwick, S, and Graves, S (2016). Novel genotypes of Coxiella burnetii identified in isolates from Australian Q fever patients. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 306, 463–470.
Novel genotypes of Coxiella burnetii identified in isolates from Australian Q fever patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |