Evaluation of oral baits and distribution methods for Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii)†
Sean Dempsey A B , Ruth J. Pye
A , Amy T. Gilbert C , Nicholas M. Fountain-Jones B , Jennifer M. Moffat A , Sarah Benson-Amram D , Timothy J. Smyser C and Andrew S. Flies A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Menzies Institute for Medical Research, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.
B School of Natural Sciences, College of Science and Engineering, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
C National Wildlife Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
D University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Wildlife Research 50(10) 807-819 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR22070
Submitted: 14 April 2022 Accepted: 22 October 2022 Published: 22 November 2022
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Abstract
Context: Diseases are increasingly contributing to wildlife population declines. Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) populations have locally declined by 82%, largely owing to the morbidity and mortality associated with two independent transmissible devil facial tumours (DFT1 and DFT2). Toxic baits are often used as a management tool for controlling vertebrate pest populations in Australia, but in other areas of the world, oral baits are also used to deliver vaccines or pharmaceuticals to wildlife.
Aim: Our goal was to evaluate the potential use of edible baits as vehicles for vaccine delivery to Tasmanian devils.
Method: We first tested bait palatability with captive devils. Bait interactions were recorded, and consumption and bait interaction behaviours were quantified. We next trialled baits containing inert capsules as potential vaccine containers in captivity. After confirming bait palatability in captivity, ground baiting was trialled at six field sites and monitored using camera traps. Finally, an automated bait dispenser was trialled at field sites to attempt to limit bait consumption by non-target species.
Key results: Captive devils consumed all types of placebo baits, but consumed a higher percentage of ruminant- and fish-based baits than cereal-based baits. Captive devils also consumed inert capsules inserted into placebo baits. Ground-baiting trials in the field showed that 53% of baits were removed from bait stations, with 76% of the removals occurring on the first night. Devils were suspected or confirmed to remove about 7% of baits compared with 93% by non-target species. We also evaluated an automated bait dispenser, which reduced bait removal by non-target species and resulted in over 50% of the baits being removed by devils.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that captive and wild devils will accept and consume placebo versions of commercial baits. Bait dispensers or modified baits or baiting strategies are needed to increase bait uptake by devils.
Implications: Bait dispensers can be used at a regional scale to deliver baits to devils. These could potentially be used as vaccine-delivery vehicles to mitigate the impacts of disease on devil populations.
Keywords: bait dispenser, captive trials, devil facial tumour disease, enteric-coated capsule, feeding behaviour, landscape vaccine distribution, oral vaccine, pest control, transmissible cancer, wildlife disease.
References
Andersen, GE, Johnson, CN, and Jones, ME (2016). Sympatric predator odour reveals a competitive relationship in size-structured mammalian carnivores. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 70, 1831–1841.| Sympatric predator odour reveals a competitive relationship in size-structured mammalian carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andersen, GE, Johnson, CN, Barmuta, LA, and Jones, ME (2017). Use of anthropogenic linear features by two medium-sized carnivores in reserved and agricultural landscapes. Scientific Reports 7, 11624.
| Use of anthropogenic linear features by two medium-sized carnivores in reserved and agricultural landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ballesteros, C, Vicente, J, Morriss, G, Jockney, I, Rodríguez, O, Gortázar, C, and de la Fuente, J (2011). Acceptance and palatability for domestic and wildlife hosts of baits designed to deliver a tuberculosis vaccine to wild boar piglets. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 98, 198–203.
| Acceptance and palatability for domestic and wildlife hosts of baits designed to deliver a tuberculosis vaccine to wild boar piglets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bürkner, P-C (2017). brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software 80, 1–28.
| brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Comte, S, Carver, S, Hamede, R, and Jones, M (2020). Changes in spatial organization following an acute epizootic: Tasmanian devils and their transmissible cancer. Global Ecology and Conservation 22, e00993.
| Changes in spatial organization following an acute epizootic: Tasmanian devils and their transmissible cancer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cunningham, CX, Johnson, CN, Hollings, T, Kreger, K, and Jones, ME (2019). Trophic rewilding establishes a landscape of fear: Tasmanian devil introduction increases risk-sensitive foraging in a key prey species. Ecography 42, 2053–2059.
| Trophic rewilding establishes a landscape of fear: Tasmanian devil introduction increases risk-sensitive foraging in a key prey species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cunningham, CX, Johnson, CN, and Jones, ME (2020). A native apex predator limits an invasive mesopredator and protects native prey: Tasmanian devils protecting bandicoots from cats. Ecology Letters 23, 711–721.
| A native apex predator limits an invasive mesopredator and protects native prey: Tasmanian devils protecting bandicoots from cats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cunningham, CX, Comte, S, McCallum, H, Hamilton, DG, Hamede, R, Storfer, A, Hollings, T, Ruiz-Aravena, M, Kerlin, DH, Brook, BW, Hocking, G, and Jones, ME (2021). Quantifying 25 years of disease-caused declines in Tasmanian devil populations: host density drives spatial pathogen spread. Ecology Letters 24, 958–969.
| Quantifying 25 years of disease-caused declines in Tasmanian devil populations: host density drives spatial pathogen spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Delong, ER, Delong, DM, and Clarke-Pearson, DL (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44, 837–845.
| Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Drawert, B, Flies, AS, Matthew, A, Powell, M, and Rumsey, B (2022). “Saving the Devils Is in the Details”. Letters in Biomathematics 9, 121–140.
Fancourt B (2010) Spatial and temporal variation in declining eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) populations in Tasmania, BSc (Hons) thesis, University of Tasmania.
Flies, AS, Flies, EJ, Fox, S, Gilbert, AT, Johnson, SR, Liu, G-S, Lyons, AB, Patchett, AL, Pemberton, D, and Pye, RJ (2020). An oral bait vaccination approach for the Tasmanian devil facial tumor diseases. Expert Review of Vaccines 19, 1–10.
| An oral bait vaccination approach for the Tasmanian devil facial tumor diseases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Friard, O, and Gamba, M (2016). BORIS : a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7, 1325–1330.
| BORIS : a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gabry J, Mahr T (2022) ‘Bayesplot: plotting for Bayesian models. R package, R package version 1.9.0.’ Available at https://mc-stan.org/bayesplot/
Hamede, R, Madsen, T, McCallum, H, Storfer, A, Hohenlohe, PA, Siddle, H, Kaufman, J, Giraudeau, M, Jones, M, Thomas, F, and Ujvari, B (2021). Darwin, the devil, and the management of transmissible cancers. Conservation Biology 35, 748–751.
| Darwin, the devil, and the management of transmissible cancers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hamilton, DG, Jones, ME, Cameron, EZ, McCallum, H, Storfer, A, Hohenlohe, PA, and Hamede, RK (2019). Rate of intersexual interactions affects injury likelihood in Tasmanian devil contact networks. Behavioral Ecology 30, 1087–1095.
| Rate of intersexual interactions affects injury likelihood in Tasmanian devil contact networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hobday, AJ, and Minstrell, ML (2008). Distribution and abundance of roadkill on Tasmanian highways: human management options. Wildlife Research 35, 712–726.
| Distribution and abundance of roadkill on Tasmanian highways: human management options.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holderness-Roddam, B, and McQuillan, PB (2014). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) as a predator and disturbance agent of wildlife in Tasmania. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 21, 441–452.
| Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) as a predator and disturbance agent of wildlife in Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hollings, T, Jones, M, Mooney, N, and McCallum, H (2013). Trophic cascades following the disease-induced decline of an apex predator, the Tasmanian devil. Conservation Biology 28, 63–75.
| Trophic cascades following the disease-induced decline of an apex predator, the Tasmanian devil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hollings, T, McCallum, H, Kreger, K, Mooney, N, and Jones, M (2015). Relaxation of risk-sensitive behaviour of prey following disease-induced decline of an apex predator, the Tasmanian devil. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, 20150124.
| Relaxation of risk-sensitive behaviour of prey following disease-induced decline of an apex predator, the Tasmanian devil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hughes, C, Gaffney, R, and Dickman, CR (2011). A preliminary study assessing risk to Tasmanian devils from poisoning for red foxes. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 385–392.
| A preliminary study assessing risk to Tasmanian devils from poisoning for red foxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnson, SR, Crider, NJ, Weyer, GA, and Tosh, RD Johnson, SR, Crider, NJ, Weyer, GA, and Tosh, RD (2016). Bait development for oral delivery of pharmaceuticals to raccoons (Procyon lotor) and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 52, 893–901.
| Bait development for oral delivery of pharmaceuticals to raccoons (Procyon lotor) and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnson, SR, Deliberto, ST, Urchek, K, Gilbert, AT, and Werner, SJ (2022). Concentration-response of an anthraquinone-based repellent for raccoons (Procyon lotor). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 251, 105628.
| Concentration-response of an anthraquinone-based repellent for raccoons (Procyon lotor).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones, ME (2000). Road upgrade, road mortality and remedial measures: impacts on a population of eastern quolls and Tasmanian devils. Wildlife Research 27, 289–296.
| Road upgrade, road mortality and remedial measures: impacts on a population of eastern quolls and Tasmanian devils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones, ME, Paetkau, D, Geffen, E, and Moritz, C (2004). Genetic diversity and population structure of Tasmanian devils, the largest marsupial carnivore. Molecular Ecology 13, 2197–2209.
| Genetic diversity and population structure of Tasmanian devils, the largest marsupial carnivore.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kayigwe, AN, Darby, JM, Lyons, AB, Patchett, AL, Lisowski, L, Liu, G-S, and Flies, AS (2022). A human adenovirus encoding IFN-γ can transduce Tasmanian devil facial tumour cells and upregulate MHC-I. Journal of General Virology , .
| A human adenovirus encoding IFN-γ can transduce Tasmanian devil facial tumour cells and upregulate MHC-I.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lamp L (2021) Implementation of an agent-based model for devil facial tumor disease in Tasmanian devils, and evaluation of interventions. Master of Science, University of Saskatchewan. Available at https://harvest.usask.ca/handle/10388/13666
Lawrence C, Wiersma HF (2019) DFTD is a killer but what about other threats. In ‘Saving the Tasmanian devil: recovery through science-based management’. (Eds CJ Hogg, S Fox, D Pemberton, K Belov) pp. 131–138. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Lazenby, BT, Tobler, MW, Brown, WE, Hawkins, CE, Hocking, GJ, Hume, F, Huxtable, S, Iles, P, Jones, ME, Lawrence, C, Thalmann, S, Wise, P, Williams, H, Fox, S, and Pemberton, D (2018). Density trends and demographic signals uncover the long-term impact of transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 1368–1379.
| Density trends and demographic signals uncover the long-term impact of transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
le Mar K (2002) Spatial organisation and habitat selection patterns of three marsupial herbivores within a patchy forestry environment, PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.
le Mar, K, and McArthur, C (2005). Comparison of habitat selection by two sympatric macropods, Thylogale billardierii and Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus, in a patchy eucalypt-forestry environment. Austral Ecology 30, 674–683.
| Comparison of habitat selection by two sympatric macropods, Thylogale billardierii and Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus, in a patchy eucalypt-forestry environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mallick, S, Pauza, M, Eason, C, Mooney, N, Gaffney, R, and Harris, S (2016). Assessment of non-target risks from sodium fluoroacetate (1080), para-aminopropiophenone (PAPP) and sodium cyanide (NaCN) for fox-incursion response in Tasmania. Wildlife Research 43, 140–152.
| Assessment of non-target risks from sodium fluoroacetate (1080), para-aminopropiophenone (PAPP) and sodium cyanide (NaCN) for fox-incursion response in Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McClure, KM, Bastille-Rousseau, G, Davis, AJ, Stengel, CA, Nelson, KM, Chipman, RB, Wittemyer, G, Abdo, Z, Gilbert, AT, and Pepin, KM (2022). Accounting for animal movement improves vaccination strategies against wildlife disease in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecological Applications 32, e2568.
| Accounting for animal movement improves vaccination strategies against wildlife disease in heterogeneous landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Müller, TF, Schröder, R, Wysocki, P, Mettenleiter, TC, and Freuling, CM (2015). Spatio-temporal use of oral rabies vaccines in fox rabies elimination programmes in Europe. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003953.
| Spatio-temporal use of oral rabies vaccines in fox rabies elimination programmes in Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Palphramand, K, Delahay, R, Robertson, A, Gowtage, S, Williams, GA, McDonald, RA, Chambers, M, and Carter, SP (2017). Field evaluation of candidate baits for oral delivery of BCG vaccine to European badgers, Meles meles. Vaccine 35, 4402–4407.
| Field evaluation of candidate baits for oral delivery of BCG vaccine to European badgers, Meles meles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pearse, AM, and Swift, K (2006). Transmission of devil facial-tumour disease. Nature 439, 549.
| Transmission of devil facial-tumour disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pollock, TI, Hocking, DP, Hunter, DO, Parrott, ML, Zabinskas, M, and Evans, AR (2022). Torn limb from limb: the ethology of prey-processing in Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii). Australian Mammalogy 44, 126–138.
| Torn limb from limb: the ethology of prey-processing in Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pye, RJ, Pemberton, D, Tovar, C, Tubio, JMC, Dun, KA, Fox, S, Darby, J, Hayes, D, Knowles, GW, Kreiss, A, Siddle, HVT, Swift, K, Lyons, AB, Murchison, EP, and Woods, GM (2016a). A second transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 374–379.
| A second transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pye, R, Hamede, R, Siddle, Hv, Caldwell, A, Knowles, GW, Swift, K, Kreiss, A, Jones, ME, Lyons, AB, and Woods, GM (2016b). Demonstration of immune responses against devil facial tumour disease in wild Tasmanian devils. Biology Letters 12, 20160553.
| Demonstration of immune responses against devil facial tumour disease in wild Tasmanian devils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pye, R, Patchett, A, McLennan, E, Thomson, R, Carver, S, Fox, S, Pemberton, D, Kreiss, A, Baz Morelli, A, Silva, A, Pearse, MJ, Corcoran, LM, Belov, K, Hogg, CJ, Woods, GM, and Lyons, AB (2018). Immunization strategies producing a humoral IgG immune response against devil facial tumor disease in the majority of Tasmanian devils destined for wild release. Frontiers in Immunology 9, 259.
| Immunization strategies producing a humoral IgG immune response against devil facial tumor disease in the majority of Tasmanian devils destined for wild release.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pye, R, Darby, J, Flies, AS, Fox, S, Carver, S, Elmer, J, Swift, K, Hogg, C, Pemberton, D, Woods, G, and Lyons, AB (2021). Post-release immune responses of Tasmanian devils vaccinated with an experimental devil facial tumour disease vaccine. Wildlife Research 48, 701–712.
| Post-release immune responses of Tasmanian devils vaccinated with an experimental devil facial tumour disease vaccine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2021) ‘R: a language and for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing)
Read, JL, Bowden, T, Hodgens, P, Hess, M, Mcgregor, H, and Moseby, K (2019). Target specificity of the felixer grooming ‘trap’. Wildlife Society Bulletin 43, 112–120.
| Target specificity of the felixer grooming ‘trap’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rocke, TE, Tripp, DW, Russell, RE, Abbott, RC, Richgels, KL, Matchett, MR, Biggins, DE, Griebel, R, Schroeder, G, Grassel, SM, Pipkin, DR, Cordova, J, Kavalunas, A, Maxfield, B, Boulerice, J, and Miller, MW (2017). Sylvatic Plague Vaccine Partially Protects Prairie Dogs (Cynomys spp.) in Field Trials. EcoHealth 14, 438–450.
| Sylvatic Plague Vaccine Partially Protects Prairie Dogs (Cynomys spp.) in Field Trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scoleri, VP, Johnson, CN, Vertigan, P, and Jones, ME (2020). Conservation trade-offs: island introduction of a threatened predator suppresses invasive mesopredators but eliminates a seabird colony. Biological Conservation 248, 108635.
| Conservation trade-offs: island introduction of a threatened predator suppresses invasive mesopredators but eliminates a seabird colony.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smyser, TJ, Redding, JV, Bevis, CM, Page, LK, and Swihart, RK (2015). Development of an automated dispenser for the delivery of medicinal or vaccine-laden baits to raccoons (Procyon lotor). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 51, 513–518.
| Development of an automated dispenser for the delivery of medicinal or vaccine-laden baits to raccoons (Procyon lotor).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thalmann, S, Peck, S, Wise, P, Potts, JM, Clarke, J, and Richley, J (2016). Translocation of a top-order carnivore: tracking the initial survival, spatial movement, home-range establishment and habitat use of Tasmanian devils on Maria Island. Australian Mammalogy 38, 68–79.
| Translocation of a top-order carnivore: tracking the initial survival, spatial movement, home-range establishment and habitat use of Tasmanian devils on Maria Island.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tovar, C, Pye, RJ, Kreiss, A, Cheng, Y, Brown, GK, Darby, J, Malley, RC, Siddle, HVT, Skjødt, K, Kaufman, J, Silva, A, Baz Morelli, A, Papenfuss, AT, Corcoran, LM, Murphy, JM, Pearse, MJ, Belov, K, Lyons, AB, and Woods, GM (2017). Regression of devil facial tumour disease following immunotherapy in immunised Tasmanian devils. Scientific Reports 7, 43827.
| Regression of devil facial tumour disease following immunotherapy in immunised Tasmanian devils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vehtari, A, Gabry, J, Yao, Y, and Gelman, A (2018). loo: efficient leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC for Bayesian models. R package version 2, 1003.
Wickham H (2016) ‘ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis.’ (Springer)
Woinarski, JCZ, Braby, MF, Burbidge, AA, Coates, D, Garnett, ST, Fensham, RJ, Legge, SM, McKenzie, NL, Silcock, JL, and Murphy, BP (2019). Reading the black book: the number, timing, distribution and causes of listed extinctions in Australia. Biological Conservation 239, 108261.
| Reading the black book: the number, timing, distribution and causes of listed extinctions in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
