Elliott traps found to be ineffective for the survey of swamp skink (Lissolepis coventryi): a cautionary tale of outdated survey guidelines
Jacinta E. Humphrey A B , Kylie A. Robert A and Steve W. J. Leonard A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic. 3086, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: J.Humphrey@latrobe.edu.au
Wildlife Research 44(7) 514-522 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17012
Submitted: 24 January 2017 Accepted: 25 July 2017 Published: 13 December 2017
Abstract
Context: Cryptic (i.e. secretive, elusive or well camouflaged) species are often very challenging to accurately survey. Because many cryptic species are threatened, the development of robust and efficient survey methods to detect them is critically important for conservation management. The swamp skink (Lissolepis coventryi) is an example of an elusive and threatened species; it inhabits densely vegetated, wet environments throughout south-east Australia. The swamp skink occurs in peri-urban areas and faces many human-induced threats including habitat loss, introduced predators and environmental pollution. Effective and reliable survey methods are therefore essential for its conservation.
Aims: This study aimed to review the current swamp skink survey guidelines to compare the detection success of Elliott traps with two alternative methods: passive infrared cameras (camera traps) and artificial refuges.
Methods: Detection probabilities for the swamp skink were compared using Elliott traps, artificial refuges and camera traps at two known populations on the Mornington Peninsula, Victoria, Australia.
Key results: Artificial refuges and camera traps were significantly more successful than Elliott traps at detecting swamp skinks.
Conclusions: Elliott traps are currently regarded as the standard technique for surveying swamp skinks; however, these traps were the least successful of the three methods trialled. Therefore, the use of Elliott traps in future swamp skink presence–absence surveys is not recommended.
Implications: Many previous surveys utilising Elliott traps have failed to detect swamp skinks in habitats where they are likely to occur. Our findings suggest that at least some of these past surveys may have reported false absences of swamp skinks, potentially resulting in poor planning decisions. A reduction in the reliance on Elliott trapping is likely to increase future swamp skink detection success, broaden our understanding of this cryptic species and aid conservation efforts. Our results emphasise that it is essential to regularly review recommended survey methods to ensure they are accurate and effective for target species.
References
Arida, E. A., and Bull, M. C. (2008). Optimising the design of artificial refuges for the Australian skink, Egernia stokesii. Applied Herpetology 5, 161–172.| Optimising the design of artificial refuges for the Australian skink, Egernia stokesii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Balme, G. A., Hunter, L. T. B., and Slotow, R. (2009). Evaluating methods for counting cryptic carnivores. The Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 433–441.
| Evaluating methods for counting cryptic carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brett Lane & Associates (2009). 570 Hall Road, Cranbourne west flora and fauna assessment. (Brett Lane & Associates: Melbourne.)
Casagrande, D. G., and Beissinger, S. R. (1997). Evaluation of four methods for estimating parrot population size. The Condor 99, 445–457.
| Evaluation of four methods for estimating parrot population size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Catling, P. C., Burt, R. J., and Kooyman, R. (1997). A comparison of techniques used in a survey of the ground-dwelling and arboreal mammals in forests in north-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 24, 417–432.
| A comparison of techniques used in a survey of the ground-dwelling and arboreal mammals in forests in north-eastern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chades, I., McDonald-Madden, E., McCarthy, M. A., Wintle, B., Linkie, M., and Possingham, H. P. (2008). When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 13936–13940.
| When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFKiurbE&md5=91795893ae5cc74cf0ea789bf0482440CAS |
Chapple, D. (2003). Ecology, life-history, and behaviour in the Australian scincid genus Egernia, with comments on the evolution of complex sociality in lizards. Herpetological Monograph 17, 145–180.
| Ecology, life-history, and behaviour in the Australian scincid genus Egernia, with comments on the evolution of complex sociality in lizards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chavel, E. E., Hoare, J. M., Batson, W. G., and O’Donnell, C. F. J. (2012). The effect of microhabitat on skink sightings beneath artificial retreats. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 39, 71–75.
| The effect of microhabitat on skink sightings beneath artificial retreats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chiao, C. C., Wickiser, J. K., Allen, J. J., Genter, B., and Hanlon, R. T. (2011). Hyperspectral imaging of cuttlefish camouflage indicates good color match in the eyes of fish predators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 9148–9153.
| Hyperspectral imaging of cuttlefish camouflage indicates good color match in the eyes of fish predators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXnsV2gt7Y%3D&md5=89e08fbe28e067c70735540f6f1ab296CAS |
Claridge, A. W., Paull, D. J., and Barry, S. C. (2010). Detection of medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals using infrared digital cameras: an alternative way forward? Australian Mammalogy 32, 165–171.
| Detection of medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals using infrared digital cameras: an alternative way forward?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clemann, N. (1997). Aspects of the biology and ecology of the swamp skink Egernia coventryi Storr, 1978 (Sauria: Scincidae). Honours Thesis, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Clemann, N. (2000a). Survival in the suburbs! The (re)discovery of the threatened swamp skink Egernia coventryi east of Melbourne, with comments on the failure of Elliott traps in a survey for this species. Victorian Naturalist 117, 180–183.
Clemann, N. (2000b). The swamp skink Egernia coventryi: a review of the biology and status. Monitor: Journal of the Victorian Herpetological Society 11, 13–15.
Clemann, N. (2004). Tamarisk Creek Wetland: survey for growling grass frogs Litoria raniformis and swamp skinks Egernia coventryi. (Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research: Melbourne.)
Clemann, N. (2006). Distribution and ecology of the swamp skink Egernia coventryi in the Port Phillip and Western Port region. Report to Melbourne Water. (Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research: Melbourne.)
Clemann, N. (2015). Cold-blooded indifference: a case study of the worsening status of threatened reptiles from Victoria, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 21, 15–26.
| Cold-blooded indifference: a case study of the worsening status of threatened reptiles from Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clemann, N., and Beardsell, C. (1999). A new inland record of the swamp skink Egernia coventryi Storr, 1978. Victorian Naturalist 116, 127–128.
Clemann, N., Brown, P., and Brown, G. (1998). A note on bait selection when trapping the swamp skink Egernia coventryi in Elliot traps. Victorian Naturalist 115, 81–83.
Clemann, N., Chapple, D. G., and Wainer, J. (2004). Sexual dimorphism, diet, and reproduction in the swamp skink, Egernia coventryi. Journal of Herpetology 38, 461–467.
| Sexual dimorphism, diet, and reproduction in the swamp skink, Egernia coventryi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crosswhite, D. L., Fox, S. F., and Thill, R. E. (1999). Comparison of methods for monitoring reptiles and amphibians in upland forests of the Ouachita Mountains. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 79, 45–50.
Cutler, T. L., and Swann, D. E. (1999). Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 571–581.
Downes, S., and Shine, R. (1998). Sedentary snakes and gullible geckos: predator–prey coevolution in nocturnal rock-dwelling reptiles. Animal Behaviour 55, 1373–1385.
| Sedentary snakes and gullible geckos: predator–prey coevolution in nocturnal rock-dwelling reptiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2sjnvVOksA%3D%3D&md5=5916ab3d005237fb5b067cc2407ae5a4CAS |
Ecology Partners (2008). Distribution and potential habitat for swamp skink (Egernia coventryi) within Melbourne Water development services schemes, Victoria. A report for Melbourne Water. (Ecology Partners: Melbourne.)
Ecology Partners (2010). Officer precinct structure plan: targeted flora and fauna surveys, Officer, Victoria. A report for Cardinia Shire Council and Growth Areas Authority. (Ecology Partners: Melbourne.)
Ecology Partners (2011). Officer precinct structure plan: conservation management plan (excluding Cardinia Creek). A report for Growth Areas Authority. (Ecology Partners: Melbourne.)
Eyre, T. J., Ferguson, D. J., Hourigan, C. L., Smith, G. C., Mathieson, M. T., Kelly, A. L., Venz, M. F., and Hogan, L. D. (2012). Terrestrial vertebrate fauna survey assessment guidelines for Queensland. (Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Queensland Government: Brisbane.)
Fenner, A., Pavey, C., and Bull, C. (2012). Behavioural observations and use of burrow systems by an endangered Australian arid-zone lizard, slater’s skink (Liopholis slateri). Australian Journal of Zoology 60, 127–132.
| Behavioural observations and use of burrow systems by an endangered Australian arid-zone lizard, slater’s skink (Liopholis slateri).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gamble, L., Ravela, S., and McGarigal, K. (2008). Multi-scale features for identifying individuals in large biological databases: an application of pattern recognition technology to the marbled salamander Ambystoma opacum. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 170–180.
| Multi-scale features for identifying individuals in large biological databases: an application of pattern recognition technology to the marbled salamander Ambystoma opacum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garden, J. G., McAlpine, C. A., Possingham, H. P., and Jones, D. N. (2007). Using multiple survey methods to detect terrestrial reptiles and mammals: what are the most successful and cost-efficient combinations? Wildlife Research 34, 218–227.
| Using multiple survey methods to detect terrestrial reptiles and mammals: what are the most successful and cost-efficient combinations?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gilbert, S., Sofo, K., Nye, E., and Steer, R. (2008). Flora and fauna survey of Cardinia Reservoir, Victoria: stage 3. A report to Melbourne Water Corporation. (BIOSIS Research: Melbourne.)
Greenberg, C. H., Neary, D. G., and Harris, L. D. (1994). A comparison of herpetofaunal sampling effectiveness of pitfall, single-ended, and double-ended funnel traps used with drift fences. Journal of Herpetology 28, 319–324.
| A comparison of herpetofaunal sampling effectiveness of pitfall, single-ended, and double-ended funnel traps used with drift fences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gu, W., and Swihart, R. K. (2004). Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models. Biological Conservation 116, 195–203.
| Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hampton, P. (2007). A comparison of the success of artificial cover types for capturing amphibians and reptiles. Amphibia-Reptilia 28, 433–437.
| A comparison of the success of artificial cover types for capturing amphibians and reptiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrison, R. L. (2006). A comparison of survey methods for detecting bobcats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 548–552.
| A comparison of survey methods for detecting bobcats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hoare, J., O’Donnell, C., Westbrooke, I., Hodapp, D., and Lettink, M. (2009). Optimising the sampling of skinks using artificial retreats based on weather conditions and time of day. Applied Herpetology 6, 379–390.
| Optimising the sampling of skinks using artificial retreats based on weather conditions and time of day.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Homan, P. (2009). Survival of vertebrate fauna in remnant vegetation patches and colonisation of revegetation areas in the La Trobe Valley, Victoria. Victorian Naturalist 126, 135–150.
Jenkins, C. L., McGarigal, K., and Gamble, L. R. (2003). Comparative effectiveness of two trapping techniques for surveying the abundance and diversity of reptiles and amphibians along drift fence arrays. Herpetological Review 34, 39–42.
Kiltie, R. A., Fan, J., and Laine, A. F. (1995). A wavelet-based metric of visual texture discrimination with applications in evolutionary ecology. Mathematical Biosciences 126, 21–39.
| A wavelet-based metric of visual texture discrimination with applications in evolutionary ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3htVymug%3D%3D&md5=c17eac959946884d67fd1074773c7054CAS |
McGrath, T., Guillera-Arroita, G., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., Osborne, W., Hunter, D., and Sarre, S. D. (2015). Accounting for detectability when surveying for rare or declining reptiles: turning rocks to find the grassland earless dragon in Australia. Biological Conservation 182, 53–62.
| Accounting for detectability when surveying for rare or declining reptiles: turning rocks to find the grassland earless dragon in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McLean, C. M., Varhammar, A., and Mikac, K. M. (2015). Use of motion-activated remote cameras to detect the endangered spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus): results from a pilot study. Australian Mammalogy 37, 113–115.
| Use of motion-activated remote cameras to detect the endangered spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus): results from a pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mengak, M. T., and Guynn, D. C. (1987). Pitfalls and snap traps for sampling small mammals and herpetofauna. American Midland Naturalist 118, 284–288.
| Pitfalls and snap traps for sampling small mammals and herpetofauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Michael, D. R., Cunningham, R. B., Donnelly, C. F., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2012). Comparative use of active searches and artificial refuges to survey reptiles in temperate eucalypt woodlands. Wildlife Research 39, 149–162.
| Comparative use of active searches and artificial refuges to survey reptiles in temperate eucalypt woodlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Parris, K. M., Norton, T. W., and Cunningham, R. B. (1999). A comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in the forests of south-east Queensland, Australia. Herpetologica 55, 271–283.
Paull, D. J., Claridge, A. W., and Cunningham, R. B. (2012). Effective detection methods for medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals: a comparison between infrared digital cameras and hair tunnels. Wildlife Research 39, 546–553.
Ribeiro-Júnior, M. A., Gardner, T. A., and Ávila-Pires, T. C. S. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of herpetofaunal sampling techniques across a gradient of habitat change in a tropical forest landscape. Journal of Herpetology 42, 733–749.
| Evaluating the effectiveness of herpetofaunal sampling techniques across a gradient of habitat change in a tropical forest landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richardson, E., Nimmo, D.G., Avitabile, S., Tworkowski, L., Watson, S.J., Welbourne, D., and Leonard, S.W.J. (). Camera traps and pitfalls: an evaluation of two methods for surveying reptiles in a semi-arid ecosystem. Wildlife Research. , .
Robert, K. A., and Thompson, M. B. (2007). Is basking opportunity in the viviparous lizard, Eulamprus tympanum, compromised by the presence of a predator scent? Journal of Herpetology 41, 287–293.
| Is basking opportunity in the viviparous lizard, Eulamprus tympanum, compromised by the presence of a predator scent?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson, P. (1980). Mourning skink investigations. ALCOA Portland aluminium smelter environmental report No. 1. (Kinhill Planners: Melbourne.)
Robertson, P. (1988). Egernia coventryi swamp skink. Nomination for listing on schedule 2 of the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988. (Wildlife Profiles: Melbourne.)
Robertson, P. (2007). Field assessment of potential habitat for the swamp skink (Egernia coventryi) within drainage scheme areas proposed by Melbourne Water. (Wildlife Profiles: Melbourne.)
Robertson, P., and Coventry, P. (2009). Monitoring of the swamp skink (Egernia coventryi) within the Tamarisk Waterway Reserve. A report for Melbourne Water Corporation. (Wildlife Profiles: Melbourne.)
Robertson, P., and Steane, D. (2008). Field survey for the swamp skink (Egernia coventryi) within the Tamarisk Waterway Reserve. A report for the Melbourne Water Corporation. (Wildlife Profiles: Melbourne.)
Robertson, P., Coventry, P., Silveira, C., and Walters, B. (2009). Survey of vertebrate fauna of Boggy Creek Waterway Reserve. A report for Melbourne Water Corporation. (Wildlife Profiles: Melbourne.)
Ryan, T. J., Philippi, T., Leiden, Y. A., Dorcas, M. E., Bently Wigley, T., and Whitfield Gibbons, J. (2002). Monitoring herpetofauna in a managed forest landscape: effects of habitat types and census techniques. Forest Ecology and Management 167, 83–90.
| Monitoring herpetofauna in a managed forest landscape: effects of habitat types and census techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Silveira, L., Jacomo, A. T. A., and Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. (2003). Camera trap, transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biological Conservation 114, 351–355.
| Camera trap, transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Southwell, C., Paxton, C. G. M., Borchers, D., Boveng, P., Rogers, T., and de la Mare, W. K. (2008). Uncommon or cryptic? Challenges in estimating leopard seal abundance by conventional but state-of-the-art methods. Deep-sea Research. Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers 55, 519–531.
| Uncommon or cryptic? Challenges in estimating leopard seal abundance by conventional but state-of-the-art methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swan, M., Di Stefano, J., Christie, F., Steel, E., and York, A. (2014). Detecting mammals in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for biodiversity monitoring and management. Biodiversity Conservation 23, 343–355.
Tyre, A. J., Tenhumberg, B., Field, S. A., Niejalke, D., Parris, K. M., and Possingham, H. P. (2003). Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates. Ecological Applications 13, 1790–1801.
| Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries (2013). Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 threatened list, June 2013. (Victorian Department of Environment and Primary Industries: Melbourne.)
Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (2007). Advisory list of threatened vertebrate fauna in Victoria – 2007. (Department of Sustainability and Environment: East Melbourne, Victoria.)
Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (2010). Biodiversity precinct structure planning kit. (Department of Sustainability and Environment: Melbourne.)
Vine, S. J., Crowther, M. S., Lapidge, S. J., Dickman, C. R., Mooney, N., Piggott, M. P., and English, A. W. (2009). Comparison of methods to detect cryptic and rare species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research 36, 436–446.
| Comparison of methods to detect cryptic and rare species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Webb, J. K., Pike, D. A., and Shine, R. (2009). Olfactory recognition of predators by nocturnal lizards: safety outweighs thermal benefits. Behavioral Ecology 21, 72–77.
| Olfactory recognition of predators by nocturnal lizards: safety outweighs thermal benefits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Welbourne, D. (2013). A method for surveying diurnal terrestrial reptiles with passive infrared automatically triggered cameras. Herpetological Review 44, 247–250.
Welbourne, D. J., MacGregor, C., Paull, D., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2015). The effectiveness and cost of camera traps for surveying small reptiles and critical weight range mammals: a comparison with labour-intensive complementary methods. Wildlife Research 42, 414–425.
| The effectiveness and cost of camera traps for surveying small reptiles and critical weight range mammals: a comparison with labour-intensive complementary methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams, A. K., and Berkson, J. (2004). Reducing false absences in survey data: detection probabilities of red-backed salamanders. The Journal of Wildlife Management 68, 418–428.
| Reducing false absences in survey data: detection probabilities of red-backed salamanders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson, S., and Swan, G. (2003). ‘A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia.’ (Reed New Holland: Sydney.)
