Can owls be used to monitor the impacts of urbanisation? A cautionary tale of variable detection
Raylene Cooke A C , Hannah Grant A , Isabel Ebsworth A , Anthony R. Rendall A , Bronwyn Isaac B and John G. White A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Centre for Integrated Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
B School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: raylene.cooke@deakin.edu.au
Wildlife Research 44(7) 573-581 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16185
Submitted: 6 October 2016 Accepted: 4 October 2017 Published: 5 December 2017
Abstract
Context: Due to their important ecological roles, predators are increasingly being suggested as targets for biodiversity studies investigating how they respond to landscape change and transformation. But there is limited literature investigating our capacity to accurately monitor changes in their occupancy.
Aims: To test the efficacy of playback surveys for monitoring owls as a basis for investigating change in owl occupancy over time. We ask whether playback is an effective tool, and whether it can be optimised to improve its utility.
Methods: Using the urban–forest interface of Melbourne, Australia, as a case study, we used playback techniques to survey for the presence of three owl species: the powerful owl (Ninox strenua); southern boobook (Ninox boobook); and eastern barn owl (Tyto javanica). Sites were repeat surveyed at least 16 times throughout the year and occupancy models were developed to establish how season and temperature influence nightly detection probabilities of owls.
Key results: All three species of owl were detected through playback survey approaches, but the detection probabilities varied greatly between species and across seasons and temperature conditions. Eastern barn owls are poor candidates for playback surveys due to their low detection probabilities. The southern boobook and powerful owl are responsive to playback, but detection probabilities are influenced by season and/or temperature conditions. To optimise survey approaches, southern boobooks should be surveyed during spring and summer and the powerful owl should be surveyed on nights where the minimum temperature is near 20°C.
Conclusions: Although there is considerable interest in using predators such as owls to monitor biodiversity impacts associated with landscape change, poor detection rates can limit their utility. However, optimising survey approaches that consider shifting detection probabilities under different conditions such as time of year or temperature may improve the utility of predators as surrogates in biodiversity monitoring.
Implications: Optimising survey approaches for owls considerably reduces the window of opportunity in which to conduct surveys. To counter this, the intensity of survey effort needs to be increased during key periods. The use of highly trained citizen science teams may be one effective way of delivering such an approach.
References
Andrén, H. (1994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71, 355–366.| Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016). 3218.0 – Regional Population Growth, Australia, 2014–15. ABS, Canberra. Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3218.0 [Verified November 2017]
Barn Owl Trust (2012). ‘The Barn Owl Conservation Handbook.’ (Pelagic Publishing: Exeter, UK.)
Bradsworth, N., White, J. G., Isaac, B., and Cooke, R. (2017). Species distribution models derived from citizen science data predict the fine scale movements of owls in an urbanizing landscape. Biological Conservation 213, 27–35.
| Species distribution models derived from citizen science data predict the fine scale movements of owls in an urbanizing landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Braga, A. C. R., and Motta-Junior, J. C. (2009). Weather conditions and moon phase influence on tropical screech owl and burrowing owl detection by playback in southeast Brazil. Ardea 97, 395–401.
| Weather conditions and moon phase influence on tropical screech owl and burrowing owl detection by playback in southeast Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bureau of Meteorology (2016). Climate and oceans data analysis. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data-services/ [Accessed 31 July 2014]
Carpenter, T. W. (1987). Effects of environmental variables on responses of eastern screech owls to playback. In: ‘Biology and Conservation of Northern Forest Owls’. (Eds R. W. Nero, R. J. Clark, R. J. Knapton and R. H. Hamre.) USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM142. pp. 277–281.
Cooke, R., Wallis, R., Hogan, F., White, J., and Webster, A. (2006). The diet of powerful owls (Ninox strenua) and prey availability in a continuum of habitats from disturbed urban fringe to protected forest environments in south-eastern Australia. Wildlife Research 33, 199–206.
| The diet of powerful owls (Ninox strenua) and prey availability in a continuum of habitats from disturbed urban fringe to protected forest environments in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Debus, S. J. S., Ley, A. J., and Rose, A. B. (2008). Further dietary items of the eastern barn owl Tyto javanica in Diamantina National Park, Queensland. Australian Field Ornithology 25, 149–152.
Department of Infrastructure (2002). Melbourne 2030: planning for sustainable growth. Victorian Department of Infrastructure, Melbourne.
ESRI (2011). ArcGIS Desktop: release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
Fiske, I. J., and Chandler, R. B. (2011). Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43, 1–23.
| Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Flesch, A. D., and Steidl, R. J. (2007). Detectability and response rates of ferruginous pygmy-owls. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 981–990.
| Detectability and response rates of ferruginous pygmy-owls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Galeotti, P. (1990). Territorial behaviour and habitat selection in an urban population of the tawny owl Strix aluco. Bolletino di zoologia 57, 59–66.
| Territorial behaviour and habitat selection in an urban population of the tawny owl Strix aluco.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grossman, S. R., Hannon, S. J., and Sanchez-Azofeifa, A. (2008). Responses of great horned owls (Bubo virginianus), barred owls (Strix varia), and northern saw-whet owls (Aegolius acadicus) to forest cover and configuration in an agricultural landscape in Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 86, 1165–1172.
| Responses of great horned owls (Bubo virginianus), barred owls (Strix varia), and northern saw-whet owls (Aegolius acadicus) to forest cover and configuration in an agricultural landscape in Alberta, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Higgins, P. J. (Ed.) (1999). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 4: Parrots to Dollarbird.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Ibarra, J. T., Martin, K., Drever, M., and Vergara, G. (2014). Occurrence patterns and niche relationships of sympatric owls in South American temperate forests: a multi-scale approach. Forest Ecology and Management 1, 1–35.
Isaac, B., White, J., Ierodiaconou, D., and Cooke, R. (2013). Response of a cryptic apex predator to a complete urban to forest gradient. Wildlife Research 40, 427–436.
Isaac, B., White, J., Ierodiaconou, D., and Cooke, R. (2014a). Does urbanization have the potential to create an ecological trap for powerful owls (Ninox strenua)? Biological Conservation 176, 1–11.
| Does urbanization have the potential to create an ecological trap for powerful owls (Ninox strenua)?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Isaac, B., White, J., Ierodiaconou, D., and Cooke, R. (2014b). Simplification of arboreal marsupial assemblages in response to increasing urbanization. PLoS One 9, e91049.
| Simplification of arboreal marsupial assemblages in response to increasing urbanization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jenkins, J. M., and Jackman, R. E. (1993). Mate and nest site fidelity in a resident population of bald eagles. The Condor 95, 1053–1056.
| Mate and nest site fidelity in a resident population of bald eagles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kavanagh, R. (2003). Conserving owls in Sydney’s urban bushland: current status and requirements. In: ‘Urban Wildlife: More than Meets the Eye’. (Eds D. Lunneyand S. Burgin.), pp. 93–108. (Royal Zoological Society of NSW: Sydney.)
Kavanagh, R. P., and Peake, P. (1993). Distribution and habitats of nocturnal forest birds in south-eastern New South Wales. In ‘Australian Raptor Studies’. (Ed. P. Olsen.) pp. 101–125. (Australasian Raptor Association, Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union: Melbourne.)
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., and Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248–2255.
| Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Hines, J. E., Knutson, M. G., and Franklin, A. B. (2003). Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84, 2200–2207.
| Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McKinney, M. L. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience 52, 883–890.
| Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McKinney, M. L. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127, 247–260.
| Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78, 691–692.
| A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Newton, I. (1979). ‘Population Ecology of Raptors’. (Bu-teo Books: Vermillion, SD.)
Newton, I., and Marquiss, M. (1982). Fidelity to breeding area and mate in sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus). Journal of Animal Ecology 51, 327–341.
| Fidelity to breeding area and mate in sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Olsen, J., and Taylor, S. (2001). Winter home range of an adult female southern boobook Ninox novaeseelandiae in suburban Canberra. Australian Bird Watcher 19, 109–114.
Olsen, J., and Trost, S. (2015). Are southern boobooks declining? Canberra Bird Notes 40, 270–271.
Olsen, J., Trost, S., and Hayes, G. (2002). Vocalisations used by the southern boobook (Ninox novaeseelandiae) in the Australian Capital Territory. In ‘Ecology and Conservation of Owls’. (Eds I. Newton, R. Kavanagh, J. Olsen and I. Taylor.) pp. 305–319. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Olsen, J., Downs, J. a., Tucker, T., and Trost, S. (2011). Home-range size and territorial calling of southern boobooks (Ninox novaeseelandiae) in adjacent territories. The Journal of Raptor Research 45, 136–142.
| Home-range size and territorial calling of southern boobooks (Ninox novaeseelandiae) in adjacent territories.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Development Core Team (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Redpath, S. M. (1994). Censusing tawny owls Strix aluco by the use of imitation calls. Bird Study 41, 192–198.
| Censusing tawny owls Strix aluco by the use of imitation calls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rinkevich, S. E., and Guitierrez, R. J. (1966). Mexican spotted owl habitat characteristics in Zion National Park. The Journal of Raptor Research 30, 74–78.
Ritchison, G., Cavanagh, P. M., Belthoff, J. R., and Sparks, E. J. (1988). The singing behavior of eastern screech-owls: seasonal timing and response to playback of conspecific song. The Condor 90, 648–652.
| The singing behavior of eastern screech-owls: seasonal timing and response to playback of conspecific song.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roth, T., and Weber, D. (2008). Top predators as indicators for species richness? Prey species are just as useful. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 987–991.
| Top predators as indicators for species richness? Prey species are just as useful.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sara, M., and Zanca, L. (1989). Aspects of censusing Strigiformes. Rivista Italiana di Ornitologia 59, 3–16.
Sergio, F., Newton, I., Marchesi, L., and Pedrini, P. (2006). Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 43, 1049–1055.
| Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sergio, F., Marchesi, L., Pedrini, P., and Penteriani, V. (2007). Coexistence of a generalist owl with its intraguild predator: distance-sensitive or habitat-mediated avoidance? Animal Behaviour 74, 1607–1616.
| Coexistence of a generalist owl with its intraguild predator: distance-sensitive or habitat-mediated avoidance?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sergio, F., Caro, T., Brown, D., Clucas, B., Hunter, J., Ketchum, J., McHugh, K., and Hiraldo, F. (2008). Top predators as conservation tools: ecological rationale, assumptions, and efficacy. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 39, 1–19.
| Top predators as conservation tools: ecological rationale, assumptions, and efficacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Simberloff, D. (1998). Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83, 247–257.
| Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single species management passé in the landscape era?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Takats, D. L., Francis, C. M., Holroyd, G. L., Duncan, J. R., Mazur, K. M., Cannings, R. J., Harris, W., and Holt, D. (2001). Guidelines for nocturnal owl monitoring in North America. Beaverhill Bird Observatory and Bird Studies Canada, Edmonton, Alberta.
Weaving, M. J., White, J. G., Isaac, B., and Cooke, R. (2011). The distribution of three nocturnal bird species across a suburban–forest gradient. Emu 111, 52–58.
| The distribution of three nocturnal bird species across a suburban–forest gradient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wintle, B. A., Kavanagh, R. P., McCarthy, M. A., and Burgman, M. A. (2005). Estimating and dealing with detectability in occupancy surveys for forest owls and arboreal marsupials. The Journal of Wildlife Management 69, 905–917.
| Estimating and dealing with detectability in occupancy surveys for forest owls and arboreal marsupials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zuberogoitia, I. C., and Campos, L. F. (1998). Censusing owls in large areas: a comparison between methods. Ardeola 45, 47–53.
