Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Temporal variations in activity patterns during rut – implications for survey techniques of red deer, Cervus elaphus

Anders Jarnemo A B C , Gunnar Jansson A and Johan Månsson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agriculture, SLU, S-730 91 Riddarhyttan, Sweden.

B Present address: Halmstad University, School of Business and Engineering, PO Box 823, S-301 18 Halmstad, Sweden.

C Corresponding author. Email: anders.jarnemo@hh.se

Wildlife Research 44(2) 106-113 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16156
Submitted: 19 August 2016  Accepted: 28 January 2017   Published: 3 March 2017

Abstract

Context: Intraspecific differences in behaviour can affect censuses and bias population estimates, suggesting that choice and implementation of census methods are fundamental, and need to be adapted to behavioural variations.

Aims: We investigated temporal variations in activity patterns during the rut among red deer (Cervus elaphus) categories and the implications for two different census methods.

Methods: We used a long-term dataset collected during 17 consecutive red deer rutting seasons in southernmost Sweden. The two census methods were: (1) a collection of observation ratios; and (2) a count of individuals including identification of males. Both methods are commonly used in ungulate management.

Key results: There was a difference in activity among age and sex categories, with a temporal variation in activity and/or presence at rutting grounds of adult (≥6 years) and subadult (2–5 years) males. Observation ratios of adult and subadult males increased from low at the start of the rut to a top level during peak rut, with subadults lagging behind adults. Before and during peak rut, the proportion of adult males was higher than that of subadults. After peak rut, the proportion of adult males decreased, whereas subadult males remained high, resulting in a higher number of subadults than of adults. The comparison of the two census methods revealed a strong correlation regarding the trends of population size and for the age and sex categories. There was also a strong consistency concerning the calf/female ratio. The male proportion was, however, consistently lower in the collected observations than in the counts.

Conclusions: The lower proportion of males in observations compared with counts may be explained by behavioural differences among male age classes, i.e. by temporal variations in presence and activity. That females, calves and yearling males are stationary during the rut, but adult and subadult males arrive and depart the rutting grounds at varying points of time, can lead to an underestimated male proportion in continuously collected observation data.

Implications: The results suggest that census should be conducted during peak rut, and that incorporating identification of individual males in the monitoring may be beneficiary.

Additional keywords: age structure, census techniques, herd composition, monitoring, photo identification, population ratios, rutting behaviour, sex ratios, ungulates, wildlife management.


References

Adrados, C., Baltzinger, C., Janeau, G., and Pépin, D. (2008). Red deer Cervus elaphus resting place characteristics obtained from differential GPS data in a forest habitat. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54, 487–494.
Red deer Cervus elaphus resting place characteristics obtained from differential GPS data in a forest habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ahlén, I. (1965). Studies on the red deer, Cervus elaphus L., In Scandinavia. I. History of distribution. II. Taxonomy and osteology of prehistoric and recent populations. III. Ecological investigations. Viltrevy (Stockholm) 3, 1–376.

Allen, A., Månsson, J., Jarnemo, A., and Bunnefeld, N. (2014). The impacts of landscape structure on the winter movements and habitat selection of female red deer. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60, 411–421.
The impacts of landscape structure on the winter movements and habitat selection of female red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Apollonio, M., Andersen, R., and Putman, R. (2010) ‘European Ungulates and their Management in the 21st Century.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Austin, Z., Cinderby, S., Smart, J. C. R., Raffaelli, D., and White, P. C. L. (2009). Mapping wildlife: integrating stakeholder knowledge with modeled patterns of deer abundance by using participatory GIS. Wildlife Research 36, 553–564.
Mapping wildlife: integrating stakeholder knowledge with modeled patterns of deer abundance by using participatory GIS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beasom, S. L., Leon, F. G., and Synatzske, D. R. (1986). Accuracy and precision of counting white-tailed deer with helicopters at different sampling intensities. Wildlife Society Bulletin 14, 364–368.

Bender, L. C. (2006). Use of herd composition and age ratios in ungulate management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 1225–1230.
Use of herd composition and age ratios in ungulate management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bender, L. C., and Spencer, R. (1999). Estimating elk population size by reconstruction from harvest data and herd ratios. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 636–645.

Bobek, B. K., Perzanowski, K., and Zielinski, J. (1986). Red deer population census in mountains: testing of an alternative method. Acta Theriologica 31, 423–431.
Red deer population census in mountains: testing of an alternative method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bocci, A., Angelini, I., Brambilla, P., Monaco, A., and Lovari, S. (2012). Shifter and resident red deer: intrapopulation and intersexual behavioural diversities in a predator-free area. Wildlife Research 39, 573–582.

Bon, R., Deneubourg, J.-L., Gerard, J.-F., and Michelena, P. (2005) Sexual segregation in ungulates: from individual mechanisms to collective patterns. In ‘Sexual Segregation in Vertebrates. Ecology of the Two Sexes’. (Eds K. E. Ruckstuhl and P. Neuhaus.) pp. 180–199. (Cambridge University Press: New York.)

Bonenfant, C., Loe, L. E., Mysterud, A., Langvatn, R., Stenseth, N. C., Gaillard, J.-M., and Klein, F. (2004). Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271, 883–892.
Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bonenfant, C., Gaillard, J.-M., Klein, F., and Hamann, J.-L. (2005). Can we use the young : female ratio to infer ungulate population dynamics? An empirical test using red deer Cervus elaphus as a model. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 361–370.
Can we use the young : female ratio to infer ungulate population dynamics? An empirical test using red deer Cervus elaphus as a model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Campbell, D., Swanson, G. M., and Sales, J. (2004). Comparing the precision and cost-effectiveness of faecal pellet group count methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 1185–1196.
Comparing the precision and cost-effectiveness of faecal pellet group count methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caughley, G. (1974). Interpretation of age ratios. The Journal of Wildlife Management 38, 557–562.
Interpretation of age ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caughley, G., and Sinclair, A. R. E. (1994) ‘Wildlife Ecology and Management.’ (Blackwell Science: Cambridge, MA.)

Ciucci, P., Catullo, G., and Boitani, L. (2009). Pitfalls in using counts of roaring stags to index red deer Cervus elaphus population size. Wildlife Research 36, 126–133.
Pitfalls in using counts of roaring stags to index red deer Cervus elaphus population size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Lonergan, M. E. (1994). Culling regimes and sex ratio biases in Highland red deer. Journal of Applied Ecology 31, 521–527.
Culling regimes and sex ratio biases in Highland red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E., and Albon, S. D. (1982) ‘Red Deer: Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes.’ (Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.)

Clutton-Brock, T. H., Iason, G. R., and Guinness, F. E. (1987). Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Zoology 211, 275–289.
Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female red deer (Cervus elaphus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Daniels, M. J. (2006). Estimating red deer Cervus elaphus populations: an analysis of variation and cost-effectiveness of counting methods. Mammal Review 36, 235–247.
Estimating red deer Cervus elaphus populations: an analysis of variation and cost-effectiveness of counting methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Douhard, M., Bonenfant, C., Gaillard, J.-M., Hamann, J.-L., Garel, M., Michallet, J., and Klein, F. (2013). Roaring counts are not suitable for the monitoring of red deer Cervus elaphus population abundance. Wildlife Biology 19, 94–101.
Roaring counts are not suitable for the monitoring of red deer Cervus elaphus population abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Drechsler, H. (1988) ‘Altersentwicklung und Altersansprache beim Rotwild. Gestalten, Gesichter, Gehabe, Geweihe, Gebisse.’ (Paul Parey: Hamburg.)

Drechsler, H. (1992). Über die Wirksamkeit des Wahlabschusses nach Geweimerkmalen bei Rothirschen. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 38, 195–201.

Ericsson, G., and Wallin, K. (1999). Hunter observations as an index of moose Alces alces population parameters. Wildlife Biology 5, 177–185.

Godvik, I. M. R., Loe, L. E., Vik, J. O., Veiberg, V., Langvatn, R., and Mysterud, A. (2009). Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. Ecology 90, 699–710.
Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harris, N. C., Kauffman, M. J., and Mills, L. S. (2008). Inferences about ungulate population dynamics derived from age ratios. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 1143–1151.
Inferences about ungulate population dynamics derived from age ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hetschold, W., and Vorreyer, F. (1968) ‘Das Ansprechen des Rotwildes.’ (Paul Parey: Hamburg.)

Höglund, J., Cortazar Chinarro, M., Jarnemo, A., and Thulin, C.-G. (2013). Genetic variation and structure in Scandinavian red deer (Cervus elaphus): influence of ancestry, past hunting and restoration management. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 109, 43–53.
Genetic variation and structure in Scandinavian red deer (Cervus elaphus): influence of ancestry, past hunting and restoration management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jarnemo, A. (2008). Seasonal migration of male red deer (Cervus elaphus) in southern Sweden and consequences for management. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54, 327–333.
Seasonal migration of male red deer (Cervus elaphus) in southern Sweden and consequences for management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jarnemo, A. (2011). Male red deer (Cervus elaphus) dispersal during the breeding season. Journal of Ethology 29, 329–336.
Male red deer (Cervus elaphus) dispersal during the breeding season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jarnemo, A. (2014) Kronviltprojektet 2005–2013. Slutrapport. Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Riddarhyttan.

Jarnemo, A., and Wikenros, C. (2014). Movement pattern of red deer during drive hunts in Sweden. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60, 77–84.
Movement pattern of red deer during drive hunts in Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jeppesen, J. L. (1987). Impact of human disturbance on home range, movements and activity of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Danish environment. Danish Review of Game Biology 13, 1–38.

Krebs, H. (1969) ‘Schießen oder schonen?’ (Mayer: München.)

Langvatn, R. (1977) Social behaviour and population structure as a basis for censusing red deer populations. In ‘Proceedings of 13th Congress of Game Biologists, Atlanta’. (Ed. T. J. Peterle.) pp. 77–89. (The Wildlife Society: Washington.)

Langvatn, R., and Albon, S. D. (1986). Geographic clines in body weight of Norwegian red deer: a novel explanation of Bergmann’s rule? Holarctic Ecology 9, 285–293.

Main, M. B., and Toit, J. T. (2005) Sex differences in reproductive strategies affect habitat choice in ungulates. In ‘Sexual Segregation in Vertebrates. Ecology of the Two Sexes’. (Eds K. E. Ruckstuhl and P. Neuhaus.) pp. 148–161. (Cambridge University Press: New York, NY.)

Mayle, B. (1996). Progress in predictive management of deer populations in British woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management 88, 187–198.
Progress in predictive management of deer populations in British woodlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mayle, B. A., Peace, A. J., and Gill, R. M. A. (1999) ‘How Many Deer? A Field Guide to Estimating Deer Population Size. Field Book 18.’ (Forestry Commission: Edinburgh.)

McComb, K. E. (1991). Female choice for high roaring rate in red deer, Cervus elaphus. Animal Behaviour 41, 79–88.
Female choice for high roaring rate in red deer, Cervus elaphus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCullough, D. R. (1994). What do herd composition counts tell us? Wildlife Society Bulletin 22, 295–300.

Meisingset, E. L., and Langvatn, R. (2000). Variasjon i vekt og reproduksjon hos hjort i Norge: resultater knyttet till overvåkningsprosjektet for hjort. Hjorteviltet 2000, 52–56.

Morellet, N., Gaillard, J.-M., Hewison, A. J. M., Ballon, P., Boscardin, Y., Duncan, P., Klein, F., and Maillard, D. (2007). Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 634–643.
Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morellet, N., Klein, F., Solberg, E., and Andersen, R. (2011) The census and management of populations of ungulates in Europe. In ‘Ungulate Management in Europe. Problems and Practices’. 1st edn. (Eds R. Putman, M. Apollonio and R. Andersen.) pp. 106–143. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Mysterud, A., and Bischof, R. (2010). Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting? Journal of Animal Ecology 79, 148–160.
Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mysterud, A., Meisingset, E. L., and Veiberg, V. (2007). Monitoring population size of red deer Cervus elaphus: an evaluation of two types of census data from Norway. Wildlife Biology 13, 285–298.
Monitoring population size of red deer Cervus elaphus: an evaluation of two types of census data from Norway.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nichols, J. D. (1992). Capture–recapture models: using marked animals to study population dynamics. Bioscience 42, 94–102.
Capture–recapture models: using marked animals to study population dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141, 2417–2431.
Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ruckstuhl, K. E., and Neuhaus, P. (2005) Activity asynchrony and social segregation. In ‘Sexual Segregation in Vertebrates. Ecology of the Two sexes’. (Eds K. E. Ruckstuhl and P. Neuhaus) pp. 165–179. (Cambridge University Press: New York.)

Sæther, B.-E., Engen, S., and Solberg, E. J. (2009). Effective size of harvested ungulate populations. Animal Conservation 12, 488–495.
Effective size of harvested ungulate populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smart, J. C. R., Ward, A. I., and White, P. C. L. (2004). Monitoring woodland deer populations in the UK: an imprecise science. Mammal Review 34, 99–114.
Monitoring woodland deer populations in the UK: an imprecise science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Solberg, E. J., and Sæther, B.-E. (1999). Hunters observations of moose Alces alces as a management tool. Wildlife Biology 5, 107–118.

Sunde, P., Olesen, C. R., Madsen, T. L., and Haugaard, L. (2009). Behavioural responses of GPS-collared female red deer Cervus elaphus to driven hunts. Wildlife Biology 15, 454–460.
Behavioural responses of GPS-collared female red deer Cervus elaphus to driven hunts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sylvén, S. (2000). Effects of scale on hunter moose Alces alces observation rate. Wildlife Biology 6, 157–165.

Wagenknecht, E. (1986). ‘Rotwild.’ (Verlag J. Neumann-Neudamm: Berlin.)

Yoccoz, N. G., Mysterud, A., Langvatn, R., and Stenseth, N. C. (2002). Age- and density-dependent reproductive effort in male red deer. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269, 1523–1528.
Age- and density-dependent reproductive effort in male red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |