Evaluation of predator-exclusion cages used in turtle conservation: cost analysis and effects on nest environment and proxies of hatchling fitness
J. L. Riley A and J. D. Litzgus A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Biology, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 2C6, Canada.
B Corresponding author. Email: jlitzgus@laurentian.ca
Wildlife Research 40(6) 499-511 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR13090
Submitted: 16 May 2013 Accepted: 4 October 2013 Published: 7 November 2013
Abstract
Context: A main goal of conservation is to mitigate anthropogenic impacts on natural ecosystems, thus conservation tools themselves should not negatively affect target species. Predator-exclusion cages are effectively used to reduce predation of turtle nests; however, their effects on nest environment and developing hatchlings have not been examined.
Aims: Our study had the following four goals: (1) to examine effects of cages on the nest environment, (2) determine whether nest caging affects proxies for hatchling fitness, (3) evaluate whether nest predators preferentially interact with certain cage types, and (4) assess the cost-effectiveness of different nest caging designs.
Methods: In 2010 and 2011 in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario, painted turtle (Chrysemys picta; n = 93) and snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina; n = 91) nests were assigned to one of three treatments (wooden-sided cages, above- and below-ground wire cages) or a control (no nest cage) and outfitted with a data logger to record incubation temperature. After emergence, hatching success and proxies of hatchling fitness were measured.
Key results: Nest temperature, hatching success, frequency of hatchling deformities and locomotor performance did not differ among cage treatments. However, hatchling body condition differed among treatments; wooden-sided and below-ground cages had the most positive influence on body condition in painted and snapping turtles, respectively. Predator interactions did not differ among treatments, and wooden-sided cages were the most inexpensive to construct.
Conclusions: Nest cages did not alter the nest environment from natural conditions but did alter hatchling body condition, and nest caging affected species differently.
Implications: Nest cages are known to reduce nest depredation, and our data indicated that, in general, nest cages also do not affect the nest environment or proxies for hatchling fitness. Thus, our findings indicated that cages are effective conservation tools that do not present secondary deleterious effects on potential recruitment.
References
Adamany, S., Salmon, M., and Witherington, B. (1997). Behavior of sea turtles at an urban beach III. Cost and benefits of nest caging as a management strategy. Florida Scientist 60, 239–253.Addiston, D. S. (1997). Galvanized wire nest cages can prevent nest depredation. Marine Turtle Newsletter 76, 8–11.
Ashmore, G. M., and Janzen, F. J. (2003). Phenotypic variation in smooth softshell turtles (Apalone mutica) from eggs incubated in constant versus fluctuating temperatures. Oecologia 134, 182–188.
| 12647158PubMed |
Barton, B. T., and Roth, J. D. (2008). Implications of intraguild predation for sea turtle nest protection. Biological Conservation 141, 2139–2145.
| Implications of intraguild predation for sea turtle nest protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bobyn, M. L., and Brooks, R. J. (1994). Incubation conditions as potential factors limiting the northern distribution of snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72, 28–37.
| Incubation conditions as potential factors limiting the northern distribution of snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bolton, S. M., Marshall, S. A., and Brooks, R. J. (2008). Opportunistic exploitation of turtles eggs by Tripanurga importuna (Walker) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 86, 151–160.
| Opportunistic exploitation of turtles eggs by Tripanurga importuna (Walker) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Booth, D. T. (2006). Influence of incubation temperature on hatchling phenotype in reptiles. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 79, 274–281.
| Influence of incubation temperature on hatchling phenotype in reptiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16555187PubMed |
Booth, D. T., Burgess, E., McCosker, J., and Lanyon, J. M. (2004). The influence of incubation temperature on post-hatching fitness characteristics of turtles. Intern. Congress Series 1275, 226–233.
| The influence of incubation temperature on post-hatching fitness characteristics of turtles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Breckenridge, W. (1960). A spiny soft-shelled turtle nest study. Herpetologica 16, 284–285.
Bull, J. J. (1985). Sex ratio and nest temperature in turtles: comparing field and laboratory data. Ecology 66, 1115–1122.
| Sex ratio and nest temperature in turtles: comparing field and laboratory data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bull, J. J., and Vogt, R. C. (1981). Temperature-sensitive periods of sex determination in emydid turtles. The Journal of Experimental Biology 218, 435–440.
| 1:STN:280:DyaL387mvFensQ%3D%3D&md5=7ee0d6eb57a9a336635459e4c611b688CAS |
Burke, R. L., Schneider, C. M., and Dolinger, M. T. (2005). Cues used by raccoons to find turtle nests: effects of flags, human scent and diamond-backed terrapin sign. Journal of Herpetology 39, 312–315.
| Cues used by raccoons to find turtle nests: effects of flags, human scent and diamond-backed terrapin sign.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Choo, B. L., and Chou, L. M. (1987). Effect of temperature on the incubation period and hatchability of Trionyx sirens Wiegmann eggs. Journal of Herpetology 21, 230–232.
| Effect of temperature on the incubation period and hatchability of Trionyx sirens Wiegmann eggs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Christiansen, J. L., and Gallaway, B. J. (1984). Raccoon removal, nesting success, and hatchling emergence in Iowa turtles with special reference to Kinosternon flavescens. The Southwestern Naturalist 29, 343–348.
| Raccoon removal, nesting success, and hatchling emergence in Iowa turtles with special reference to Kinosternon flavescens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Converse, S. J., Iverson, J. B., and Savidge, J. A. (2002). Activity, reproduction, and overwintering behavior of ornate box turtles (Terrapene ornata ornata) in the Nebraska Sandhills. American Midland Naturalist 148, 416–422.
| Activity, reproduction, and overwintering behavior of ornate box turtles (Terrapene ornata ornata) in the Nebraska Sandhills.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Correa-H, J. C., Cano-Constano, A. M., Paez, V. P., and Restrepo, A. (2010). Reproductive ecology of the Magdalena River turtle (Podocnemis lewyana) in the Mompos Depression Colombia. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 9, 70–78.
| Reproductive ecology of the Magdalena River turtle (Podocnemis lewyana) in the Mompos Depression Colombia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crouse, D. T., Crowder, L. B., and Caswell, H. (1987). A stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 68, 1412–1423.
| A stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crowder, L. B., Crouse, D. T., Heppel, S. S., and Martin, T. H. (1994). Predicting the impact of turtle excluder devices on loggerhead sea turtle populations. Ecological Applications 4, 437–445.
| Predicting the impact of turtle excluder devices on loggerhead sea turtle populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davy, C. M., and Murphy, R. W. (2009). Explaining patterns of deformity in freshwater turtles using MacCulloch’s hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 87, 433–439.
| Explaining patterns of deformity in freshwater turtles using MacCulloch’s hypothesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Solla, S. R., Fernie, K. J., and Ashpole, S. (2008). Snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) as bioindicators in Canadian Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin. II. Changes in hatching success and hatchling deformities in relation to persistent organic pollutants. Environmental Pollution 153, 529–536.
| Snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) as bioindicators in Canadian Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin. II. Changes in hatching success and hatchling deformities in relation to persistent organic pollutants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXmtVagt70%3D&md5=62cfebd9c382d4d0337943bebb96344eCAS | 18039552PubMed |
Delmas, V., Baudry, E., Girondot, M., and Prevot-Julliard, A. (2007). The righting response as a fitness index in freshwater turtles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 91, 99–109.
| The righting response as a fitness index in freshwater turtles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Díaz-Paniagua, C., Keller, C., and Andreu, A. C. (1997). Hatching success, delay of emergence and hatchling biometry of the spur-thighed tortoise, Testudo graeca, in south-western Spain. Journal of Zoology (London, England) 243, 543–553.
| Hatching success, delay of emergence and hatchling biometry of the spur-thighed tortoise, Testudo graeca, in south-western Spain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doody, S. (1999). A test of comparative influences of constant and fluctuating incubation temperatures on phenotypes of hatchling turtles. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3, 529–531.
Du, W., and Ji, X. (2003). The effects of incubation thermal environments on size, locomotor performance, and early growth of hatchling soft-shell turtles, Pelodiscus sinensis. Journal of Thermal Biology 28, 279–286.
| The effects of incubation thermal environments on size, locomotor performance, and early growth of hatchling soft-shell turtles, Pelodiscus sinensis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Engeman, R. M., Martin, R. E., Constantin, B., Noel, R., and Woolard, J. (2003). Monitoring predators to optimize their management for marine turtle nest predation. Biological Conservation 113, 171–178.
| Monitoring predators to optimize their management for marine turtle nest predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Engeman, R. M., Martin, R. E., Smith, H. T., Woolard, J., Crady, C. K., Constantin, B., Stahl, M., and Groninger, N. P. (2006). Impact on predation of sea turtle nests when predator control was removed midway through nesting season. Wildlife Research 33, 187–192.
| Impact on predation of sea turtle nests when predator control was removed midway through nesting season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ernst, C. H., and Lovich, J. E. (2009). ‘Turtles of the United States and Canada.’ 2nd edn. (Hopkins Fullfillment Service: Baltimore, MD.)
Finkler, M. S., and Claussen, D. L. (1997). Use of the tail in terrestrial locomotor activities of juvenile Chelydra serpentina. Copeia 1997, 884–887.
| Use of the tail in terrestrial locomotor activities of juvenile Chelydra serpentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fordham, D. A., Georges, A., and Brook, B. W. (2008). Indigenous harvest, exotic pig predation and location persistence of a long-lived vertebrate: managing a tropical freshwater turtle for sustainability and conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 52–62.
| Indigenous harvest, exotic pig predation and location persistence of a long-lived vertebrate: managing a tropical freshwater turtle for sustainability and conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frazer, N. B. (1992). Sea turtle conservation and halfway technology. Conservation Biology 6, 179–184.
| Sea turtle conservation and halfway technology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freedberg, S., Stumpf, A. L., Ewert, M. A., and Nelson, C. E. (2004). Developmental environment has long-lasting effects on behavioral performance in two turtles with environmental sex determination. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6, 739–747.
Freedberg, S., Lee, C., and Pappas, M. (2011). Agricultural practices alter sex ratios in a reptile with environmental sex determination. Biological Conservation 144, 1159–1166.
| Agricultural practices alter sex ratios in a reptile with environmental sex determination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garber, S. D., and Burger, J. (1995). A 20-yr study documenting the relationship between turtle decline and human recreation. Ecological Applications 5, 1151–1162.
| A 20-yr study documenting the relationship between turtle decline and human recreation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
García-Berthou, E. (2001). On the misuse of residuals in ecology: testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance. Journal of Animal Ecology 70, 708–711.
| On the misuse of residuals in ecology: testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garrett, K., Wallace, B. P., Garner, J., and Paladino, F. V. (2010). Variations in leatherback turtle nest environments: consequences for hatching success. Endangered Species Research 11, 147–155.
| Variations in leatherback turtle nest environments: consequences for hatching success.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gillingwater, S. D. (2001). A selective herpetofaunal survey, inventory and biological research study of Rondeau Provincial Park. Unpublished report to Rondeau Provincial Park, Morpeth, Ontario, Canada.
Gotelli, N. J., and Ellison, A. M. (2004). ‘A Primer of Ecological Statistics.’ (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.)
Hanson, J., Wibbels, T., and Martin, R. E. (1998). Predicted female bias in sex ratios of hatchling loggerhead sea turtles from a Florida nesting beach. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76, 1850–1861.
| Predicted female bias in sex ratios of hatchling loggerhead sea turtles from a Florida nesting beach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hawkes, L. A., Broderick, A. C., Godfrey, M. H., and Godley, B. J. (2007). Investigating the potential impacts of climate change on a marine turtle population. Global Change Biology 13, 923–932.
| Investigating the potential impacts of climate change on a marine turtle population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heppel, S. S. (1997). On the importance of eggs. Marine Turtle Newsletter 76, 6–8.
Hewavisenthi, S., and Parmenter, C. J. (2001). Influence of incubation environment on the development of the flatback turtle (Natator depressus). Copeia 2001, 668–682.
| Influence of incubation environment on the development of the flatback turtle (Natator depressus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holt, S. M. (2000). Development and evaluation of a model for turtle embryonic growth. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
Hughes, E. J., and Brooks, R. J. (2006). The good mother: does nest-site selection constitute parental investment in turtles? Journal of Zoology 84, 1545–1554.
Hutchison, V. H., Vinegar, A., and Kosk, R. J. (1966). Critical thermal maxima in turtles. Herpetologica 22, 31–41.
Irwin, W. P., Horner, A. J., and Lohmann, K. J. (2004). Magnetic field distortions produced by protective cages around sea turtle nests: unintended consequences for orientation and navigation? Biological Conservation 118, 117–120.
| Magnetic field distortions produced by protective cages around sea turtle nests: unintended consequences for orientation and navigation?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Janzen, F. J., and Paukstis, G. L. (1991). Environmental sex determination in reptiles: ecology, evolution, and experimental design. The Quarterly Review of Biology 66, 149–179.
| Environmental sex determination in reptiles: ecology, evolution, and experimental design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3MzmvVSisg%3D%3D&md5=c2b491fa0c9a15fe3b5f3b72eda71eddCAS | 1891591PubMed |
Kolbe, J. J., and Janzen, F. J. (2002). Spatial and temporal dynamic of turtle nest predation: edge effects. Oikos 99, 538–544.
| Spatial and temporal dynamic of turtle nest predation: edge effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kornaraki, E., Matossian, D. A., Mazaris, A. D., Matsinos, Y. G., and Margaritoulis, D. (2006). Effectiveness of different conservation measures for loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) nests at Zakynthos Island, Greece. Biological Conservation 130, 324–330.
| Effectiveness of different conservation measures for loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) nests at Zakynthos Island, Greece.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kurz, D. J., Straley, K. M., and DeGregorio, B. A. (2011). Out-foxing the red fox: how to best protect the nests of the endangered loggerhead marine turtle Caretta caretta from mammalian predation? Oryx 2011, 1–6.
Les, H. L., Paitz, R. T., and Bowden, R. M. (2007). Experimental test of the effects of fluctuating incubation temperatures on hatchling phenotype. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 307A, 274–280.
| Experimental test of the effects of fluctuating incubation temperatures on hatchling phenotype.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Litzgus, J. D., Bolton, F., and Schulte-Hostedde, A. I. (2008). Reproductive output depends on body condition in spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata). Copeia 2008, 86–92.
| Reproductive output depends on body condition in spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Logan, M. (2010). ‘Biostatistical Design and Analysis Using R, a Practical Guide.’ (Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK.)
Mahmoud, I. Y., Klicka, J., and Hess, G. L. (1973). Normal embryonic stages of the western painted turtle, Chrysemys picta belli. Journal of Morphology 141, 269–279.
| Normal embryonic stages of the western painted turtle, Chrysemys picta belli.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE2c%2FjtFymug%3D%3D&md5=aa497c0c01f5d14bc81fa401d1ebd0d5CAS | 4753442PubMed |
Mast, R. B., and Carr, J. L. (1989). Carapacial scute variation in Kemp’s Ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys kempi) hatchlings and juveniles. In ‘Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle Biology, Conservation and Management’. (Eds C. W. Caillouet and A. M. Landry.) pp. 202–219. (National Marine Fisheries Service and Texas A&M University at Galveston: Galveston, TX.)
Matsuzawa, Y., Sato, K., Sakamoto, W., and Bjorndal, K. A. (2002). Seasonal fluctuations in sand temperature: effects on the incubation period and mortality of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) pre-emergent hatchlings in Minabe, Japan. Marine Biology 140, 639–646.
| Seasonal fluctuations in sand temperature: effects on the incubation period and mortality of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) pre-emergent hatchlings in Minabe, Japan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McKnight, C. M., and Gutzke, W. H. N. (1993). Effects of the embryonic environment and of hatchling housing conditions on growth of young snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina). Copeia 1993, 475–482.
| Effects of the embryonic environment and of hatchling housing conditions on growth of young snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mersey Tobeatic Research Institute and Parks Canada (2009). Annual report of research and monitoring in the greater Kejimkujik ecosystem 2008. Mersey Tobeatic Research Institute and Parks Canada, Kempt, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Mitchell, J. C., and Klemens, M. W. (2000). Primary and secondary effects of habitat alteration. In ‘Turtle Conservation’. (Ed. M. W. Klemens.) pp. 5–32. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC.)
Mrosovsky, N., and Provancha, J. (1989). Sex ratio of loggerhead sea turtles hatching on a Florida beach. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67, 2533–2539.
| Sex ratio of loggerhead sea turtles hatching on a Florida beach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mroziak, M. I., Salmon, M., and Rusenko, K. (2000). Do wire cages protect sea turtles from foot traffic and mammalian predators? Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3, 693–698.
Mullins, M. A., and Janzen, F. J. (2006). Phenotypic effects of thermal means and variances on smooth softshell turtle (Apalone mutica) embryos and hatchlings. Herpetologica 62, 27–36.
| Phenotypic effects of thermal means and variances on smooth softshell turtle (Apalone mutica) embryos and hatchlings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Neuwald, J. L., and Valenzuela, N. (2011). The lesser known challenge of climate change: the variance and sex-reversal in vertebrates with temperature-dependent sex determination. PLoS ONE 6, e18117.
| The lesser known challenge of climate change: the variance and sex-reversal in vertebrates with temperature-dependent sex determination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXktlChu7k%3D&md5=77e4053159f085c98ade777beb3187b7CAS | 21448294PubMed |
Newbury, N., Khalil, M., and Venizelos, L. (2002). Population status and conservation of marine turtles at El-Mansouri, Lebanon. Zoology in the Middle East 27, 47–60.
| Population status and conservation of marine turtles at El-Mansouri, Lebanon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
O’Steen, S. (1998). Embryonic temperature influences juvenile temperature and growth rate in snapping turtles Chelydra serpentina. The Journal of Experimental Biology 201, 439–449.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7msVeqtw%3D%3D&md5=09e06a92eda39e91f61c3687b3802874CAS | 9503646PubMed |
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (1998). ‘Algonquin Provincial Park Management Plan.’ (Queen’s Printer for Ontario: Ottawa, Canada.)
Packard, G. C., and Packard, M. J. (1998). Water relations of embryonic snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) exposed to wet or dry environments at different times in incubation. Physiological Zoology 61, 95–106.
Packard, G. C., Miller, K., Packard, M. J., and Birchard, G. F. (1999). Environmentally induced variation in body size and condition in hatchling snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina). Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 278–289.
Paitz, R. T., Clairardin, S. G., Griffin, A. M., Holgersson, M. C. N., and Bowden, R. M. (2010). Temperature fluctuations affect offspring sex but not morphological, behavioral, or immunological traits in the northern painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 88, 479–486.
| Temperature fluctuations affect offspring sex but not morphological, behavioral, or immunological traits in the northern painted turtles (Chrysemys picta).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Perez-Heydrich, C., Jackson, K., Wendland, L. D., and Brown, M. B. (2012). Gopher tortoise hatchling survival: field study and meta-analysis. Herpetologica 68, 334–344.
| Gopher tortoise hatchling survival: field study and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Plummer, M. V. (2010). Habitat use and movements of kingsnakes (Lampropeltis getula holbrooki) in a partially abandoned and reforested agricultural landscape. Herpetological Conservation Biology 5, 214–222.
Prugh, L. R., Stoner, C. J., Epps, C. W., Bean, W. T., Ripple, W. J., Laliberte, A. S., and Brashares, J. S. (2009). The rise of the mesopredator. Bioscience 59, 779–791.
| The rise of the mesopredator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rafferty, A. R., and Reina, R. D. (2012). Arrested embryonic development: a review of strategies to delay hatching in egg-laying reptiles. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences 279, 2299–2308.
| Arrested embryonic development: a review of strategies to delay hatching in egg-laying reptiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22438503PubMed |
Rahman, S., and Burke, R. L. (2010). Evaluating nest protectors for turtle conservation. In ‘Final Reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program’. (Eds D. J. Yozzo, S. H. Fernald and H. Andreko.) pp. 1–23. (Hudson River Foundation: New York, NY.)
Rasmussen, M. L., and Litzgus, J. L. (2010). Patterns of maternal investment in spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata): implications of trade-offs, scales of analyses, and incubation substrates. Ecoscience 17, 47–58.
| Patterns of maternal investment in spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata): implications of trade-offs, scales of analyses, and incubation substrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ratnaswamy, M. J., Warren, R. J., Kramer, M. T., and Adam, M. D. (1997). Comparisons of lethal and nonlethal techniques to reduce raccoon depredation of sea turtle nests. The Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 368–376.
| Comparisons of lethal and nonlethal techniques to reduce raccoon depredation of sea turtle nests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reece, S. E., Broderick, A. C., Godley, B. J., and West, S. A. (2002). The effects of incubation environment, sex, and pedigree on the hatchling phenotype in a natural population of loggerhead turtles. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4, 737–748.
Reed, J. M., Fefferman, N., and Averill-Murray, R. C. (2009). Vital rate sensitivity analysis as a tool for assessing management actions for the desert tortoise. Biological Conservation 142, 2710–2717.
| Vital rate sensitivity analysis as a tool for assessing management actions for the desert tortoise.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Refsnider, J. M., and Janzen, F. J. (2010). Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 41, 39–57.
| Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rhen, T., and Lang, J. W. (1999). Temperature during embryonic and juvenile development influences growth in hatchling snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina. Journal of Thermal Biology 24, 33–41.
| Temperature during embryonic and juvenile development influences growth in hatchling snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ritchie, E. G., and Johnson, C. N. (2009). Predator interactions, mesopredator release, and biodiversity conservation. Ecology Letters 12, 982–998.
| Predator interactions, mesopredator release, and biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19614756PubMed |
Rodríguez-Robles, J. A. (1998). Alternative perspectives on the diet of gopher snakes (Pituophis catenifer, Colubridae): temperature records versus stomach contents of wild and museum specimens. Copeia 1998, 463–466.
| Alternative perspectives on the diet of gopher snakes (Pituophis catenifer, Colubridae): temperature records versus stomach contents of wild and museum specimens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rollinson, N., and Brooks, R. J. (2007). Marking nests increases the frequency of nest depredation in a northern population of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Journal of Herpetology 41, 174–176.
| Marking nests increases the frequency of nest depredation in a northern population of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roznik, E. A., and Alford, R. A. (2012). Does waterproofing Thermochron iButton dataloggers influence temperature readings? Journal of Thermal Biology 37, 260–264.
| Does waterproofing Thermochron iButton dataloggers influence temperature readings?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Samson, J., Hughes, E. J., and Brooks, R. J. (2007). Excavation is a nondeleterious method for obtaining fecundity and morphometric data from small-sized eggs of freshwater turtles. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 6, 255–259.
| Excavation is a nondeleterious method for obtaining fecundity and morphometric data from small-sized eggs of freshwater turtles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schwarzkopf, L., and Brooks, R. J. (1985). Sex determination in northern painted turtles: effect of incubation at constant and fluctuating temperatures. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 2543–2547.
| Sex determination in northern painted turtles: effect of incubation at constant and fluctuating temperatures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schwarzkopf, L., and Brooks, R. J. (1987). Nest-site selection and offspring sex ratio in painted turtles, Chrysemys picta. Copeia 1987, 53–61.
| Nest-site selection and offspring sex ratio in painted turtles, Chrysemys picta.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shine, R., LeMaster, M. P., Moore, I. T., Olson, M. M., and Mason, R. T. (2001). Bumpus in the snake den: effects of sex, size, and body condition on mortality of red-sided garter snakes. Evolution 55, 598–604.
| Bumpus in the snake den: effects of sex, size, and body condition on mortality of red-sided garter snakes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrlvV2rtg%3D%3D&md5=f1427bbf43d08b6230d7732afa4080e5CAS | 11327166PubMed |
Smith, L. L., Steen, D. A., Conner, L. M., and Rutledge, J. A. (2013). Effects of predator exclusion on nest and hatchling survival in the gopher tortoise. The Journal of Wildlife Management 77, 352–358.
| Effects of predator exclusion on nest and hatchling survival in the gopher tortoise.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spencer, R., and Janzen, F. J. (2010). Demographic consequences of adaptive growth and the ramifications for conservation of long-lived organisms. Biological Conservation 143, 1951–1959.
| Demographic consequences of adaptive growth and the ramifications for conservation of long-lived organisms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spinks, P. Q., Pauly, G. B., Crayon, J. J., and Shaffer, H. B. (2003). Survival of the western pond turtle (Emys marmorata) in an urban California environment. Biological Conservation 113, 257–267.
| Survival of the western pond turtle (Emys marmorata) in an urban California environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spotila, J. R. (2011). ‘Saving Sea Turtles.’ (The John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)
Standing, K. L., Herman, T. B., and Morrison, I. P. (1999). Nesting ecology of Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) in Nova Scotia, the northeastern limit of the species’ range. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 1609–1614.
Steen, D. A., and Gibbs, J. P. (2004). Effects of roads on the structure of freshwater turtle populations. Conservation Biology 18, 1143–1148.
| Effects of roads on the structure of freshwater turtle populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Steyermark, A. C., and Spotila, J. R. (2001). Effects of maternal identity and incubation temperature on hatching and hatchling morphology in snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina. Copeia 2001, 129–135.
| Effects of maternal identity and incubation temperature on hatching and hatchling morphology in snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strickland, J., Colbert, P., and Janzen, F. J. (2010). Experimental analysis of effects of markers and habitat structure on predation of turtle nests. Journal of Herpetology 44, 467–470.
| Experimental analysis of effects of markers and habitat structure on predation of turtle nests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tomillo, P. S., Saba, V. S., Piedra, R., Paladino, F. V., and Spotila, J. R. (2008). Effects of illegal harvest of eggs on the population decline of leatherback turtles in Las Baulas Marine National Park, Costa Rica. Conservation Biology 22, 1216–1224.
| Effects of illegal harvest of eggs on the population decline of leatherback turtles in Las Baulas Marine National Park, Costa Rica.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18637915PubMed |
Türkozan, O., Ilgaz, C., and Serdar, S. (2001). Carapacial scute variation in loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta. Zoology in the Middle East 24, 137–142.
| Carapacial scute variation in loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weisrock, D. W., and Janzen, F. J. (1999). Thermal and fitness-related consequences of nest location in painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Functional Ecology 13, 94–101.
| Thermal and fitness-related consequences of nest location in painted turtles (Chrysemys picta).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wibbels, T. (2003). Critical approaches to sex determination in sea turtles. In ‘The Biology of Turtles’. 2nd edn. (Eds P. L. Lutz and J. A. Musick.) pp. 104–126. (CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL).
Wilhoft, D. C., Hotaling, E., and Franks, P. (1983). Effects of temperature on sex determination in embryos of the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina. Journal of Herpetology 17, 38–42.
| Effects of temperature on sex determination in embryos of the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson, D. S. (1998). Nest-site selection: microhabitat variation and its effects on the survival of turtle embryos. Ecology 79, 1884–1892.
| Nest-site selection: microhabitat variation and its effects on the survival of turtle embryos.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yerli, S., Canbolat, A. F., Brown, L. J., and Macdonald, D. W. (1997). Mesh grids protect loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta nests from red fox Vulpes vulpes predation. Biological Conservation 82, 109–111.
| Mesh grids protect loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta nests from red fox Vulpes vulpes predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yntema, C. L. (1964). Procurement and use of turtle embryos for experimental procedures. The Anatomical Record 149, 577–585.
| Procurement and use of turtle embryos for experimental procedures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF2M%2FgvVWitw%3D%3D&md5=d3d10eb558cfc02bbc96a45eab0ddfc6CAS | 14203739PubMed |
Yntema, C. L. (1968). A series of stages in the embryonic development of Chelydra serpentina. Journal of Morphology 125, 219–251.
| A series of stages in the embryonic development of Chelydra serpentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF1M%2FgslKlug%3D%3D&md5=46e55e2c9999ac3aa09a2f27c6a1998eCAS | 5681661PubMed |
Yntema, C. L. (1979). Temperature levels and periods of sex determination during incubation of eggs in Chelydra serpentina. Journal of Morphology 159, 17–27.
| Temperature levels and periods of sex determination during incubation of eggs in Chelydra serpentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
