Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

On the use of the IUCN status for the management of trophy hunting

Lucille Palazy A B C , Christophe Bonenfant A , Jean-Michel Gaillard A and Franck Courchamp B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Laboratoire Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 boulevard du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.

B Laboratoire Écologie, Systématique et Evolution, UMR CNRS 8079, University Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France.

C Corresponding author. Email: lucille.palazy@u-psud.fr

Wildlife Research 39(8) 711-720 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR12121
Submitted: 10 July 2012  Accepted: 9 October 2012   Published: 19 November 2012

Abstract

Context: Whether trophy hunting is beneficial or a threat to the conservation of species is an open and hotly debated question. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) is in charge of assessing the need for species protection at the global scale and providing a useful guide for sustainable exploitation and conservation. Consideration of the IUCN status in wildlife management and its consequences on the attractiveness of trophy-hunted species remains to be quantified.

Aims: The present study investigated the link between the IUCN status of the trophy species and its exploitation in 124 taxa. We expected that the number of trophies should be inversely correlated with the IUCN vulnerability status across species.

Methods: Using the database of the Safari Club International, one of the largest hunting associations worldwide, we investigated the effect (1) of the first status attribution and (2) of an upgrade of the IUCN status on the number of trophies recorded by the Safari Club International, by comparing the average number of trophies 5 years before and after a status change.

Key results: First, we found that the status attributed by the IUCN in a given year had no effect on the number of recorded trophies during the following 5 years. Second, upgrading the IUCN status led to an important decrease in the number of recorded trophies for most species (75%), except for the most vulnerable ones (African elephant, Loxodonta africana; banteng, Bos javanicus; lelwel hartebeest, Alcelaphus buselaphus lelwel; European bison, Bison bonasus).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that although a protective IUCN status lowers the exploitation of the moderately threatened species, hunting pressure on the most threatened one increases instead. The findings support the possibility of an anthropogenic Allee effect (AAE), i.e. a disproportionate exploitation of the rarest species.

Implications: The highly profitable exploitation of rare species could have harmful consequences, unless appropriate management actions and protection rules are enforced.

Additional keywords: hunting club, protection measures, threat, wildlife management.


References

Baillie, J. E. M., Hilton-Taylor, C., and Stuart, S. N. (2004). ‘2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: a Global Species Assessment.’ (IUCN Publications Services Unit: Cambridge, UK.)

Collar, N. J. (1996). The reasons for red data books. Oryx 30, 121–130.
The reasons for red data books.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Courchamp, F., Angulo, E., Rivalan, P., Hall, R. J., Signoret, L., Bull, L., and Meinard, Y. (2006). Rarity value and species extinction: the anthropogenic Allee effect. PLoS Biology 4, 2405–2410.
Rarity value and species extinction: the anthropogenic Allee effect.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xhtlenur%2FO&md5=54f276ee836d450fd562949273982a19CAS |

Cousins, J. A., Sadler, J. P., and Evans, J. (2008). Exploring the role of private wildlife ranching as a conservation tool in south Africa: stakeholder perspectives. Ecology and Society 13, 43.

DeMatteo, K. E., and Loiselle, B. A. (2008). New data on the status and distribution of the bush dog (Speothos venaticus): evalutating its quality of protection and directing research efforts. Biological Conservation 141, 2494–2505.
New data on the status and distribution of the bush dog (Speothos venaticus): evalutating its quality of protection and directing research efforts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frisina, M. R., and Tareen, S. N. A. (2009). Exploitation prevents extinction: case study of endangered himalayan sheep and goats. In ‘Recreational Hunting, Conservation, and Rural Livelihoods’. (Eds B. Dickson, J. Hutton and W. M. Adams.) pp. 141–156. (Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK.)

Grosbois, V., Gimenez, O., Gaillard, J. M., Pradel, R., Barbraud, C., Clobert, J., Møller, A. P., and Weimerskirch, H. (2008). Assessing the impact of climate variation on survival in vertebrate populations. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 83, 357–399.
Assessing the impact of climate variation on survival in vertebrate populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crjs1ejsA%3D%3D&md5=ac350f513a362dab7e71efa6e25d136cCAS |

Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (1986). Generalized additive models. Statistical Science 1, 297–310.
Generalized additive models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson, P. J., Kansky, R., Loveridge, A. J., and MacDonald, D. W. (2010). Size, rarity and charisma: Valuing african wildlife trophies. PLoS ONE 5, e12866.
Size, rarity and charisma: Valuing african wildlife trophies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Leader-Williams, N. (2009). Conservation and hunting: friends or foes? In ‘Recreational Hunting, Conservation, and Rural Livelihoods’. (Eds B. Dickson, J. Hutton and W. M. Adams.) pp. 9–24. (Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK.)

Leader-Williams, N., Milledge, S., Adcock, K., Brooks, M., Conway, A., Knight, M., Mainka, S., Martin, E. B., and Teferi, T. (2005). Trophy hunting of black rhinos Diceros bicornis: proposals to ensure its future sustainability. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 8, 1–11.
Trophy hunting of black rhinos Diceros bicornis: proposals to ensure its future sustainability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lewis, D. M., and Alpert, P. (1997). Trophy hunting and wildlife conservation in Zambia. Conservation Biology 11, 59–68.
Trophy hunting and wildlife conservation in Zambia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindsey, P. A., Roulet, P. A., and Romanach, S. S. (2007). Economic and conservation significance of the trophy hunting industry in sub-Saharan Africa. Biological Conservation 134, 455–469.
Economic and conservation significance of the trophy hunting industry in sub-Saharan Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindsey, P. A., Romanach, S. S., and Davies-Mostert, H. T. (2009). The importance of conservancies for enhancing the value of game ranch land for large mammal conservation in southern Africa. Journal of Zoology 277, 99–105.
The importance of conservancies for enhancing the value of game ranch land for large mammal conservation in southern Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loveridge, A. J., Searle, A. W., Murindagomo, F., and Macdonald, D. W. (2007). The impact of sport-hunting on the population dynamics of an African lion population in a protected area. Biological Conservation 134, 548–558.
The impact of sport-hunting on the population dynamics of an African lion population in a protected area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Milner, J. M., Nilsen, E. B., and Andreassen, H. P. (2007). Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores. Conservation Biology 21, 36–47.
Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Myers, N., and Knoll, A. H. (2001). The biotic crisis and the future of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5389–5392.
The biotic crisis and the future of evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjs1Wgtb0%3D&md5=00810cd99aae5aa08e1e88dba0a1e8f0CAS |

Mysterud, A. (2012). Trophy hunting with uncertain role for population dynamics and extinction of ungulates. Animal Conservation 15, 14–15.
Trophy hunting with uncertain role for population dynamics and extinction of ungulates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Packer, C., Kosmala, M., Cooley, H. S., Brink, H., Pintea, L., Garshelis, D., Purchase, G., Strauss, M., Swanson, A., Balme, G., Hunter, L., and Nowell, K. (2009). Sport hunting, predator control and conservation of large carnivores. PLoS ONE 4, e5941.
Sport hunting, predator control and conservation of large carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Packer, C., Brink, H., Kissui, B. M., Maliti, H., Kushnir, H., and Caro, T. (2011). Effects of trophy hunting on lion and leopard populations in Tanzania. Conservation Biology 25, 142–153.
Effects of trophy hunting on lion and leopard populations in Tanzania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7nvFCmug%3D%3D&md5=f7d2618abe62edc1fb5825c2faecd146CAS |

Palazy, L., Bonenfant, C., Gaillard, J. M., and Courchamp, F. (2011). Cat dilemma: too protected to escape trophy hunting? PLoS ONE 6, e22424.
Cat dilemma: too protected to escape trophy hunting?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtVOju7bI&md5=4f586a3f721b4175b5b36a9ea4ffcdd9CAS |

Palazy, L., Bonenfant, C., Gaillard, J. M., and Courchamp, F. (2012). Rarity, trophy hunting and ungulates. Animal Conservation 15, 4–11.
Rarity, trophy hunting and ungulates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pavoine, S., Ollier, S., Pontier, D., and Chessel, D. (2008). Testing for phylogenetic signal in phenotypic traits: new matrices of phylogenetic proximities. Theoretical Population Biology 73, 79–91.
Testing for phylogenetic signal in phenotypic traits: new matrices of phylogenetic proximities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Plumptre, A. J., Davenport, T. R. B., Behanyana, M., Kityo, R., Eilu, G., Ssegawa, P., Ewango, C., Meirte, D., Kahindo, C., Herremans, M., Peterhans, J. K., Pilgrim, J. D., Wilson, M., Languy, M., and Moyer, D. (2007). The biodiversity of the Albertine rift. Biological Conservation 134, 178–194.
The biodiversity of the Albertine rift.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Prescott, G. W., Johnson, P. J., Loveridge, A. J., and Macdonald, D. W. (2011). Does change in IUCN status affect demand for African bovid trophies? Animal Conservation 15, 248–252.

R Development Core Team (2009). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna.)

Raven, P. H. (2003). Biodiversity and the future. American Scientist 91, 382.

Rodrigues, A. S. L., Pilgrim, J. D., Lamoreux, J. F., Hoffman, M., and Brooks, T. M. (2006). The value of IUCN red list for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 71–76.
The value of IUCN red list for conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thornback, J., and Jenkins, M. (1982). ‘The IUCN Mammal Red Data Book: Threatened Mammalian Taxa of the Americas and the Australasian Zoogeographic Region (Excluding Cetacea).’ (World Conservation Union: Gland, Switzerland.)

Wilkie, D. S., and Carpenter, J. F. (1999). The potential role of safari hunting as a source of revenue for protected areas in the Congo Basin. Oryx 33, 339–345.
The potential role of safari hunting as a source of revenue for protected areas in the Congo Basin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |