Is translocation of stock-raiding leopards into a protected area with resident conspecifics an effective management tool?
Maja Weilenmann A B E , Markus Gusset B C , David R. Mills B , Tefo Gabanapelo D and Monika Schiess-Meier A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
B Leopard Ecology & Conservation, Khutse Game Reserve, Private Bag BR7, Gaborone, Botswana.
C Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Abingdon OX13 5QL, United Kingdom.
D Department of Wildlife and National Parks, PO Box 93, Molepolole, Botswana.
E Corresponding author. Email: maja.weilenmann@ieu.uzh.ch
Wildlife Research 37(8) 702-707 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR10013
Submitted: 1 February 2010 Accepted: 21 October 2010 Published: 22 December 2010
Abstract
Context: Translocation as a non-lethal management tool to eliminate individual ‘problem’ animals is commonly used but rarely evaluated.
Aim: We sought to evaluate whether translocating stock-raiding leopards (Panthera pardus) into a protected area with resident conspecifics in Botswana is effective in dealing with ‘problem’ carnivores.
Methods: We assessed release-site fidelity, ranging behaviour, individual survival and reduction of conflict after translocation of four translocated leopards in relation to four resident conspecifics, which were tracked from 24 days up to 4 years.
Key results: None of the translocated leopards showed release-site fidelity; they either returned to the trap site or showed extensive roaming behaviour after release. Three of the four translocated leopards reportedly resumed stock-raiding and were shot when ranging outside of protected areas, which apparently was a consequence of being released into an area already occupied by territorial conspecifics. On the basis of satellite telemetry, the linear movement distance of one translocated leopard (1249 km) and the range size of three resident female leopards (513 ± 124 km2) are the largest on record.
Conclusions: From comparing the survival and ranging behaviour of translocated leopards with that of resident conspecifics, we conclude that translocation was not an effective management tool for dealing with stock-raiding leopards in our study.
Implications: Rather than translocating ‘problem’ carnivores, efforts should focus on reducing the potential for problems to develop, most importantly on improving livestock-husbandry practices.
Additional keywords: human–wildlife conflict, leopard, livestock predation, Panthera pardus, problem animal, ranging behaviour, translocation.
References
Balme, G. A., Slotow, R., and Hunter, L. T. B. (2010). Edge effects and the impact of non-protected areas in carnivore conservation: leopards in the Phinda–Mkhuze Complex, South Africa. Animal Conservation 13, 315–323.| Edge effects and the impact of non-protected areas in carnivore conservation: leopards in the Phinda–Mkhuze Complex, South Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Börger, L., Franconi, N., De Michele, G., Gantz, A., Meschi, F., Manica, A., Lovari, S., and Coulson, T. (2006). Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 1393–1405.
| Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17032372PubMed |
Bothma, J., du, P., Knight, M. H., Le Riche, E. A. N., and Van Hensbergen, H. J. (1997). Range size of southern Kalahari leopards. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 27, 94–99.
Bradley, E. H., Pletscher, D. H., Bangs, E. E., Kunkel, K. E., Smith, D. W., Mack, C. M., Meier, T. J., Fontaine, J. A., Niemeyer, C. C., and Jimenez, M. D. (2005). Evaluating wolf translocation as a nonlethal method to reduce livestock conflicts in the northwestern United States. Conservation Biology 19, 1498–1508.
| Evaluating wolf translocation as a nonlethal method to reduce livestock conflicts in the northwestern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cobb, S. (1981). The leopard – problems of an overabundant, threatened, terrestrial carnivore. In ‘Problems in Management of Locally Abundant Wild Mammals’. (Eds P. A. Jewell and S. Holt.) pp. 181–192. (Academic Press: London.)
De Laune, M. (2003). ‘Xtools ArcView Extension.’ (Oregon Department of Forestry: Salem, OR.)
De Solla, S. R., Bonduriansky, R., and Brooks, R. J. (1999). Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance in home range estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 68, 221–234.
| Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance in home range estimates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer, J., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2000). An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation 96, 1–11.
| An assessment of the published results of animal relocations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gautestad, A. O., and Mysterud, I. (1995). The home range ghost. Oikos 74, 195–204.
| The home range ghost.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Griffith, B., Scott, J. M., Carpenter, J. W., and Reed, C. (1989). Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245, 477–480.
| Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvitlKqsA%3D%3D&md5=f880754babf38ef20e763de36241ab1dCAS | 17750257PubMed |
Gusset, M., Swarner, M. J., Mponwane, L., Keletile, K., and McNutt, J. W. (2009). Human–wildlife conflict in northern Botswana: livestock predation by endangered African wild dog Lycaon pictus and other carnivores. Oryx 43, 67–72.
| Human–wildlife conflict in northern Botswana: livestock predation by endangered African wild dog Lycaon pictus and other carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hayward, M. W., Adendorff, J., Moolman, M., Hayward, G. J., and Kerley, G. I. H. (2007). The successful reintroduction of leopard Panthera pardus to the Addo Elephant National Park. African Journal of Ecology 45, 103–104.
| The successful reintroduction of leopard Panthera pardus to the Addo Elephant National Park.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hayward, M. W., Hayward, G. J., Druce, D. J., and Kerley, G. I. H. (2009). Do fences constrain predator movements on an evolutionary scale? Home range, food intake and movement patterns of large predators reintroduced to Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 18, 887–904.
| Do fences constrain predator movements on an evolutionary scale? Home range, food intake and movement patterns of large predators reintroduced to Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hooge, P. N., and Eichenlaub, B. (2001). ‘Animal Movement Extension to ArcView.’ (US Geological Survey Alaska Biological Science Center: Anchorage, AK.)
Hunter, L. (1998). Early post-release movements and behaviour of reintroduced cheetahs and lions, and technical considerations in large carnivore restoration. In ‘Cheetahs as Game Ranch Animals’. (Ed. B. L. Penzhorn.) pp. 72–82. (South African Veterinary Association: Onderstepoort, South Africa.)
Inskip, C., and Zimmermann, A. (2009). Human–felid conflict: a review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx 43, 18–34.
| Human–felid conflict: a review of patterns and priorities worldwide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jennrich, R. I., and Turner, F. B. (1969). Measurement of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22, 227–237.
| Measurement of non-circular home range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF1M3gtleisA%3D%3D&md5=ff7fbd0da13eeeb3be0817e95b42eeaaCAS | 5783911PubMed |
Laver, P. N., and Kelly, M. J. (2008). A critical review of home range studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 290–298.
| A critical review of home range studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Linnell, J. D. C., Aanes, R., Swenson, J. E., Odden, J., and Smith, M. E. (1997). Translocation of carnivores as a method for managing problem animals: a review. Biodiversity and Conservation 6, 1245–1257.
| Translocation of carnivores as a method for managing problem animals: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marker, L. L., and Dickman, A. J. (2005). Factors affecting leopard (Panthera pardus) spatial ecology, with particular reference to Namibian farmlands. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 35, 105–115.
Massei, G., Quy, R. J., Gurney, J., and Cowan, D. P. (2010). Can translocations be used to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts? Wildlife Research 37, 428–439.
| Can translocations be used to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller, B., Ralls, K., Reading, R. P., Scott, J. M., and Estes, J. (1999). Biological and technical considerations of carnivore translocation: a review. Animal Conservation 2, 59–68.
| Biological and technical considerations of carnivore translocation: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ramsauer, S., and König, B. (2007). GPS-data reveal exclusive territoriality in Kalahari lions. In ‘Living at Low Density – A Study of Within and Between Pride Dynamics in Kalahari Lions’. (Ed. S. Ramsauer.) pp. 44–70. (Verlag Dr Hut: Munich.)
Ramsauer, S., Bay, G., Meli, M., Hofmann-Lehmann, R., and Lutz, H. (2007). Seroprevalence of selected infectious agents in a free-ranging, low-density lion population in the Central Kalahari Game Reserves in Botswana. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology; CVI 14, 808–810.
| Seroprevalence of selected infectious agents in a free-ranging, low-density lion population in the Central Kalahari Game Reserves in Botswana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXns1Oktbc%3D&md5=6104d80ef36c792f7dc387b9ac4817d1CAS | 17460117PubMed |
Rodgers, A. R., and Carr, A. P. (1998). ‘HRE: The Home Range Extension for ArcView.’ (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources’ Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research: Thunder Bay, ON.)
Schiess-Meier, M., Ramsauer, S., Gabanapelo, T., and König, B. (2007). Livestock predation – insights from problem animal control registers in Botswana. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1267–1274.
| Livestock predation – insights from problem animal control registers in Botswana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schoener, T. W. (1981). An empirically based estimate of home range. Theoretical Population Biology 20, 281–325.
| An empirically based estimate of home range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seaman, D. E., Millspaugh, J. J., Kernohan, B. J., Brundige, G. C., Raedeke, K. J., and Gitzen, R. A. (1999). Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63, 739–747.
| Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Selebatso, M., Moe, S. R., and Swenson, J. E. (2008). Do farmers support cheetah Acinonyx jubatus conservation in Botswana despite livestock depredation? Oryx 42, 430–436.
| Do farmers support cheetah Acinonyx jubatus conservation in Botswana despite livestock depredation?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Somers, M. J., and Gusset, M. (2009). The role of social behaviour in carnivore reintroductions. In ‘Reintroduction of Top-order Predators’. (Eds M. W. Hayward and M. J. Somers.) pp. 270–281. (Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK.)
Spencer, S. R., Cameron, G. N., and Swihart, R. K. (1990). Operationally defining home range: temporal dependence exhibited by hispid cotton rats. Ecology 71, 1817–1822.
| Operationally defining home range: temporal dependence exhibited by hispid cotton rats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stander, P. E. (1990). A suggested management strategy for stock-raiding lions in Namibia. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 20, 37–43.
Stander, P. E. (1997). Field age determination of leopards by tooth wear. African Journal of Ecology 35, 156–161.
| Field age determination of leopards by tooth wear.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stander, P. E., //au, K., |ui, N., Tsisaba, D., and Dam, D. (1997). Non-consumptive utilisation of leopards: community conservation and ecotourism in practice. In ‘Lions and Leopards as Game Ranch Animals’. (Ed. J. van Heerden.) pp. 50–57. (South African Veterinary Association: Onderstepoort, South Africa.)
Swihart, R. K., and Slade, N. A. (1985). Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology 66, 1176–1184.
| Testing for independence of observations in animal movements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woodroffe, R., and Ginsberg, J. R. (1998). Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280, 2126–2128.
| Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXkt1Glu7g%3D&md5=063a8a2c59b59fa5d98eaf15fb214042CAS | 9641920PubMed |
Worton, B. J. (1995). Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators. The Journal of Wildlife Management 59, 794–800.
| Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
