Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR09110
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 37(5)

Improving the viability of large-mammal populations by using habitat and landscape models to focus conservation planning

Yongyut Trisurat A E , Anak Pattanavibool B , George A. Gale C and David H. Reed D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.

B Wildlife Conservation Society Thailand Program, Nonthaburi 11120, Thailand.

C Conservation Ecology Program, School of Bioresources & Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology, Thonburi, 83 Moo 8, Thakham, Bangkhuntien, Bangkok 10150, Thailand.

D Department of Biology, The University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.

E Corresponding author. Email: fforyyt@ku.ac.th

Wildlife Research 37(5) 401-412 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09110
Submitted: 20 August 2009  Accepted: 13 June 2010   Published: 11 August 2010

Abstract

Context. Assessing the viability of animal populations in the wild is difficult or impossible, primarily because of limited data. However, there is an urgent need to develop methods for estimating population sizes and improving the viability of target species.

Aims. To define suitable habitat for sambar (Cervus unicolor), banteng (Bos javanicus), gaur (Bos gaurus), Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) and tiger (Panthera tigris) in the Western Forest Complex, Thailand, and to assess their current status as well as estimate how the landscape needs to be managed to maintain viable populations.

Methods. The present paper demonstrates a method for combining a rapid ecological assessment, landscape indices, GIS-based wildlife-habitat models, and knowledge of minimum viable population sizes to guide landscape-management decisions and improve conservation outcomes through habitat restoration.

Key results. The current viabilities for gaur and elephant are fair, whereas they are poor for tiger and banteng. However, landscape quality outside the current distributions was relatively intact for all species, ranging from moderate to high levels of connectivity. In addition, the population viability for sambar is very good under the current and desired conditions.

Conclusions. If managers in this complex wish to upgrade the viabilities of gaur, elephant, tiger and banteng within the next 10 years, park rangers and stakeholders should aim to increase the amount of usable habitat by ~2170 km2 or 17% of existing suitable habitats. The key strategies are to reduce human pressures, enhance ungulate habitats and increase connectivity of suitable habitats outside the current distributions.

Implications. The present paper provides a particularly useful method for managers and forest-policy planners for assessing and managing habitat suitability for target wildlife and their population viability in protected-area networks where knowledge of the demographic attributes (e.g. birth and death rates) of wildlife populations are too limited to perform population viability analysis.


Acknowledgements

We thank the Danish Government for funding the Western Forest Complex for Ecosystem Management Project. In addition, we are grateful to the superintendents and the staff of the WEFCOM Project for providing information and TNC for training on the Five-S Framework. Special thanks are given to both the reviewers, the Associate Editor and Editor for the constructive comments for improving this manuscript.


References

Allen, C. R. , Pearlstine, L. G. , and Kitchens, W. M. (2001). Modeling viable mammal populations in gap analysis. Biological Conservation 99, 135–144.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Beissinger S. R. , and McCullough D. R. (Eds) (2002). ‘Population Viability Analysis.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)

Brito, D. , and Figueredo, M. S. L. (2003). Minimum viable population and conservation status of the Atlantic Forest spiny rat Trinomys eliasi. Biological Conservation 113, 153–158.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | DARUDEC (1999). ‘Consultancy Services Agreement for WEFCOM Ecosystem Management.’ (Royal Forest Department and DANCED Thailand Program: Bangkok.)

ESRI (1992). ‘Cell-based Modeling with GRID.’ (Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc.: New York.)

Groves C. R. (2003). ‘Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner’s Guide to Planning for Biodiversity.’ (The Nature Conservancy and Island Press: Washington, DC.)

IUCN (2004). ‘IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.’ (The World Conservation Union (IUCN): Gland, Switzerland.)

Karanth, U. , Chundawat, R. S. , Nichols, J. D. , and Kumar, N. S. (2004). Estimation of tiger densities in the tropical forests of Panna, Central India, using photographic capture-recapture sampling. Animal Conservation 7, 285–290.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kutintara U. (1975). Structure of dry dipterocarp forest. PhD Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.

Lekakul B. , and McNeely J. (1977). ‘Mammals of Thailand.’ (Kurusaphra Press: Bangkok.)

Leroux, S. J. , Schmiegelow, F. K. A. , Lessard, R. B. , and Cumming, S. G. (2007). Minimum dynamic reserves: a framework for determining reserve size in ecosystems structured by large disturbances. Biological Conservation 138, 464–473.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McGarigal K. , and Marks B. (1995). FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General technical report, PNW-GTR-351, Portland, OR.

Neter J. , Wasserman W. , Nachtsheim C. J. , and Kutner M. H. (1996). ‘Applied Linear Regression Models.’ 3rd Edn. (Irwin: Chicago, IL.)

Noss, R. F. , Carrol, C. , Vance-Borland, K. , and Wuerthner, G. (2002). A multicriteria assessment of irreplaceability and vulnerability of sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Conservation Biology 16, 895–908.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Patton D. R. (1992). ‘Wildlife Habitat in Forested Ecosystem.’ (Timber Press: Portland, OR.)

Petdee A. (2000). Feeding habits of the tiger Panthera tigris (Linnaeus) in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary by fecal analysis. M.Sc. Thesis (in Thai), Kasetsart University, Bangkok.

Pickett, S. T. A. , and Thompson, J. N. (1978). Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves. Biological Conservation 13, 27–37.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Prayurasiddhi T. (1997). The ecological separation of gaur (Bos gaurus) and banteng (Bos javanicus) in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Prommakul P. (2003). Habitat utilization and prey of the tiger (Panthera tigris (Linnaeus)) in the Eastern Thung Yai Naresuan Wildlife Sanctuary. M.Sc. Thesis (in Thai), Kasetsart University, Bangkok.

Reed, D. H. (2004). Extinction risk in fragmented habitats. Animal Conservation 7, 181–191.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Reed D. H. (2008). The effects of population size on population viability: from mutation to environmental catastrophes. In ‘Conservation Biology: Evolution in Action’. (Eds S. P. Carroll and C. W. Fox.) pp. 16–34. (Oxford University Press: New York.)

Reed, D. H. , O’Grady, J. J. , Brook, B. W. , Ballou, J. D. , and Frankham, R. (2003). Estimates of minimum viable population sizes for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates. Biological Conservation 113, 23–34.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sayre R. , Roca E. , Sedaghatkish G. , Young B. , Keel S. , Roca R. , and Sheppard S. (2000). ‘Nature in Focus: Rapid Ecological Assessment.’ (The Nature Conservancy, Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Simcharoen, S. , Pattanavibool, A. , Ullas, K. , Nichols, J. D. , and Kumar, N. S. (2007). How many tigers Panthera tigris are there in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand? An estimate using photographic capture-recapture sampling. Oryx 41, 447–453.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Smith R. D. , and Maltby E. (2003). ‘Using the Ecosystem Approach to Implement the Convention on Biological Diversity: Key Issues and Case Studies.’ (The World Conservation Union (IUCN): Gland, Switzerland.)

Smith J. L. D. , Shrestha M. , and Gurung B. (2004). Tiger conservation and priority areas for ecological restoration: a landscape approach 2001–2003. Final report submitted to The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Department of Fishes, Wildlife & Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Smitinand T. (1987). ‘Flora of Thung Yai and Huai Kha Khaneg Wildlife Sanctuaries. Forest Herbarium.’ (Royal Forest Department: Bangkok.)

Srikrachang, M. , and Srikosamart, S. (2006). Monitoring population and distribution changes of large Herbivores during 1988–2005 at Khao Nang Ram Wildlife Research Station and Headquarters of Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Uthaithani Province. Wildlife Year Book 7, 33–43.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Timmins R. J. , Steinmetz R. , Sagar Baral H. , Samba Kumar N. , Duckworth J. W. , Anwarul Islam Md. , Giman B. , Hedges S. , Lynam A. J. , Fellowes J. , Chan B. P. L. , and Evans T. (2008). ‘Rusa unicolor.’ In ‘IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2’. (The World Conservation Union (IUCN): Gland, Switzerland.)

TNC (The Nature Conservancy) (2000). ‘The Five-S Framework for Site Conservation: A Practitioner’s Handbook for Site Conservation Planning and Measuring Success.’ (The Nature Conservancy: Arlington, VA.)

Traill, L. W. , Bradshaw, C. J. A. , and Brook, B. W. (2007). Minimum viable population size: a meta-analysis of 30 years of published estimates. Biological Conservation 139, 159–166.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Trisurat Y. (2003). Ecosystem-based management zones of Western Forest Complex in Thailand. In ‘Electronic Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Scientific and Management of Protected Areas Association on Making Ecosystem-based Management Work’. (Eds N. W. P. Munro, P. Dearden, T. B. Herman, K. Beazley and S. Nielsen-Bondrup.) (Science and Management of Protected Areas Association, University of Victoria: Nova Scotia and Vancouver, Canada.)

Trisurat, Y. , Eiumnoh, A. , Murai, S. , Hussain, M. Z. , and Shrestha, R. P. (2000). Improvement of tropical vegetation mapping using a remote sensing technique: a case of Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21, 2031–2042.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Vanichbancha K. (2001). ‘Multivariate Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (in Thai).’ (Chulalongkorn University Printing: Bangkok.)

Wanthongchai, K. , Bauhus, J. , and Goldammer, J. G. (2008). Nutrient losses through prescribed burning of aboveground litter and understorey in dry dipterocarp forests of different fire history. Catena 74, 321–332.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | WEFCOM (Western Forest Complex for Ecosystem Management Project) (2002). Rapid assessment of socio-economics in the Western Forest Complex. Final technical report (in Thai), Royal Forest Department, Bangkok.

WEFCOM (Western Forest Complex for Ecosystem Management Project) (2003). The vegetation and the flora of the Western Forest Complex: using rapid ecological assessment and vegetation description. Final technical report (in Thai), Royal Forest Department, Bangkok.

WEFCOM (Western Forest Complex for Ecosystem Management Project) (2004). GIS database and its application for ecosystem management. Final technical report, Royal Forest Department, Bangkok.

Wikramanayake E. , Boonratana R. , Rundel P. , and Aggimarangsee N. (2000). ‘Terrestrial Ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific: A Conservation Assessment.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)