Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR07132
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 35(6)

Effect of the GnRH vaccine GonaCon on the fertility, physiology and behaviour of wild boar

G. Massei A C , D. P. Cowan A , J. Coats A , F. Gladwell A , J. E. Lane A and L. A. Miller B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, YO26 5LE, UK.

B USDA APHIS National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: g.massei@csl.gov.uk

Wildlife Research 35(6) 540-547 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07132
Submitted: 5 September 2007  Accepted: 18 March 2008   Published: 22 October 2008

Abstract

Fertility control has the potential to be used as an attractive alternative to lethal methods for limiting population growth in overabundant species. This study tested the effectiveness and potential side effects of the single-dose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) vaccine GonaCon on the physiology and behaviour of two groups of captive female wild boar in two sequential trials (Trial 1 and Trial 2). Following vaccination with GonaCon, data on contraceptive effectiveness were recorded as well as data on time budget, social rank, bodyweight, haematology and biochemistry. The concentration of GnRH-antibody titres peaked 2–6 weeks after vaccination and remained relatively high 12 weeks after vaccination. In Trial 1, all control females and none of the treated females gave birth. In Trial 2, faecal progesterone of treated females decreased to basal levels within a month of vaccination. No differences in time budget, social rank and blood parameters were observed between treated and control females. Bodyweight increased more in treated females than in controls. These results indicated that GonaCon can suppress reproduction of wild boar with no significant short-term effects on behaviour and physiology. GonaCon can be regarded as an effective, humane and safe contraceptive for managing wild boar populations.


Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Defra project WM0406. Thank you to Roger Quy, Gary Killian and Christi Yoder for useful discussion and comments on previous drafts. We are grateful to Steve Langton, Tony Prickett and Stephane Pietravalle for assistance with statistical analyses.


References

Barlow, N. D. (2000). The ecological challenge in immunocontraception: editor’s introduction. Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 897–902.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Choquenot D. , McIlroy J. , and Korn T. (Ed.) (1996). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Pigs.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)

Cowan D. P. , Massei G. , and Mellows R. (2006). A modeling approach to evaluating potential applications of emerging fertility control technologies in the UK. In ‘Proceedings of the 22nd Vertebrate Pest Conference’. (Eds R. M. Timm and J. M. O’Brien.) pp. 55–62. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

Cronin, G. M. , Dunshea, F. R. , Butler, K. L. , McCauley, I. , Barnett, J. L. , and Hemsworth, P. H. (2003). The effects of immuno- and surgical-castration on the behaviour and consequent growth of group-housed, male finisher pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 111–126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Mauget R. (1982). Seasonality of reproduction in the wild boar. In ‘Control of Pig Reproduction’. (Eds D. J. A. Cole and G. R. Foxcroft.) pp. 509–526. (Butterworth: London.)

Mauget R. , Campan R. , Spitz F. , Dardaillon M. , Janeau G. , and Pepin D. (1984). Synthèse des connaissance actuelles sur la biologie du sanglier, perspectives de recherche. In ‘Symposium International sur le Sanglier’. (Eds F. Spitz and D. Pepin.) pp. 15–50. (Coll. INRA: Toulouse.)

McCauley, I. , Watt, M. , Suster, D. , Kerton, D. J. , Oliver, W. T. , Harrell, R. J. , and Dunshea, F. R. (2003). A GnRF vaccine (Improvac) and porcine somatotropin (Reporcin) have synergistic effects upon growth performance in both boars and gilts. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 11–20.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Miller L. A. , Rhyan J. , and Killian G. J. (2003). Evaluation of GnRH contraceptive vaccine using domestic swine as a model for feral hogs. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th Vertebrate Pest Conference’. (Eds K. A. Fagerstone and G. W. Witmer.) pp. 120–127. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

Miller L. A. , Rhyan J. , and Killian G. J. (2004 a). Gonacon™, a versatile GnRH contraceptive for a large variety of pest animal problems. In ‘Proceedings of the 21st Vertebrate Pest Conference’. (Eds R. M. Timm and W. P. Gorenzel.) pp. 269–273. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

Miller, L. A. , Rhyan, J. , and Drew, M. (2004b). Contraception of bison by GnRH vaccine: a possible means of decreasing transmission of brucellosis in bison. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 40, 725–730.
|  CAS | PubMed | Nash P. B. , James D. K. , Hui L. T. , and Miller L. A. (2004). Fertility control of California ground squirrels using GnRH immunocontraception. In ‘Proceedings of the 21st Vertebrate Pest Conference’. (Eds R. M. Timm and W. P. Gorenzel.) pp. 274–278. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

Payne R. W. (Ed.) (2003). ‘GenStat 7.1 Numerical Algorithms Group.’ (VSN International: Oxford.)

Perry K. R. , Arjo W. M. , Bynum K. S. , and Miller L. A. (2006). GnRH single-injection immunocontraception of black-tailed deer. In ‘Proceedings of the 22nd Vertebrate Pest Conference’. (Eds R. M. Timm and J. M. O’Brien.) pp. 72–77. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

Ramsey, D. (2007). Effects of fertility control on behaviour and disease transmission in brushtail possums. Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 109–116.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singer, F. J. , Swank, W. T. , and Clebsh, E. E. C. (1984). Effects of wild pig rooting in a deciduous forest. Journal of Wildlife Management 48, 464–473.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |

Smith, G. C. , and Cheeseman, C. L. (2002). A mathematical model for the control of diseases in wildlife populations: culling, vaccination and fertility control. Ecological Modelling 150, 45–53.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sodeikat, G. , and Pohlmeyer, K. (2003). Escape movements of family groups of wild boar Sus scrofa influenced by drive hunts in Lower Saxony, Germany. Wildlife Biology 9, 43–49.


Tshewang, U. , Dowsett, K. F. , Knott, L. M. , and Trigg, T. E. (1997). Preliminary study of ovarian activity in fillies treated with a GnRH vaccine. Australian Veterinary Journal 75, 663–667.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |