Evaluating helicopter-based surveys for estimating densities of Himalayan thar
David Choquenot A C , Neil Bolton B and Darrin Woods BA Landcare Research, PO Box 92170, Auckland, New Zealand.
B Department of Conservation, Private Bag, Twizel, New Zealand.
C Corresponding author. Email: choquenotd@landcareresearch.co.nz
Wildlife Research 35(4) 358-364 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07054
Submitted: 11 May 2007 Accepted: 31 March 2008 Published: 27 June 2008
Abstract
Himalayan thar (Hemitragus jemlahicus Smith) inhabit a large area of New Zealand’s southern alps. Since 1993, a control plan for thar has required estimation of thar density within management units (MUs), and across their range. We evaluated helicopter-based survey as an alternative to current ground-based surveys to provide these estimates. Both survey methods sample thar density within predetermined survey-catchments located in MUs. Helicopter- and ground-based surveys undertaken in four survey-catchments (three located in MU4, one located in MU3) contrasted the performance of the two methods. Helicopter-based surveys used a double-count method to estimate the sightability of thar groups. Sightability varied from 0.53 for single thar, to 1.0 for groups of three or more. Correction factors accounting for sightability were applied to helicopter-based counts to estimate thar density within survey-catchments, which were contrasted with estimates from ground-based surveys. Density estimates for three of the survey-catchments were within 25%, and displayed no systematic bias, indicating reasonable convergence of the two methods. The effect of sampling rate on precision of density estimates was explored using helicopter-based survey results for survey-catchments sampled within MU4. Confidence intervals for the density estimate stabilised when 10–15 survey-catchments were sampled, equivalent to a sampling rate of 13–20% of the MU. Compared with ground-based surveys, helicopter-based surveys were 30% cheaper, less logistically constrained, and could be applied randomly across MUs. This suggests that they may be a better option to meet the information requirements for implementation of the thar control plan, at least in MUs where habitat is sufficiently open.
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the Canterbury Conservancy of the Department of Conservation. Earlier drafts were improved by comments from John Parkes and Ray Webster, and editing by Christine Bezar. John Tracey provided valuable advice on some of the analyses used.
Bayliss, P. , and Yeomans, K. M. (1989). Correcting bias in aerial survey population estimates of feral livestock in northern Australia using the double-count technique. Journal of Applied Ecology 26, 925–933.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Caughley, G. , and Grice, D. (1982). A correction factor for counting emus from the air, and its application to counts in Western Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 9, 253–259.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forsyth, D. M. (1999). Long-term harvesting and male migration in a New Zealand population of Himalayan tahr Hemitragus jemlahicus. Journal of Applied Ecology 36, 351–362.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Magnusson, W. E. , Caughley, G. , and Grigg, G. C. (1978). A double-survey estimate of population size from incomplete counts. Journal of Wildlife Management 42, 174–176.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pople, A. R. , Clancy, T. F. , Thompson, J. A. , and Boyd-Law, S. (1998). Aerial survey methodology and the cost of control for feral goats in western Queensland. Wildlife Research 25, 393–407.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Saunders, G. R. (1993). Observations on the effectiveness of shooting feral pigs from helicopters. Wildlife Research 20, 771–776.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tracey, J. P. , Fleming, P. J. S. , and Melville, G. J. (2005). Does variable probability of detection compromise the use of indices in aerial surveys of medium-sized mammals? Wildlife Research 32, 245–252.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tracey, J. P. , Fleming, P. J. S. , and Melville, G. J. (2008). Accuracy of some aerial survey estimators: contrasts with known numbers. Wildlife Research 35, 377–384.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tustin, K. G. , and Parkes, J. P. (1988). Daily movement and activity of female and juvenile Himalayan thar (Hemitragus jemlhicus) in the eastern Southern Alps, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 11, 51–59.
