Methods and ethical considerations of pitfall trapping for the western pygmy possum (Cercartetus concinnus Gould) (Marsupialia : Burramyidae), with observations on capture patterns and nest sites
Angela J. L. Pestell A B and Sophie Petit B CA Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
B School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: sophie.petit@unisa.edu.au
Wildlife Research 34(4) 296-305 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR06090
Submitted: 18 July 2006 Accepted: 14 May 2007 Published: 28 June 2007
Abstract
In order to enhance future trapping of the western pygmy possum (Cercartetus concinnus) and minimise the capture of non-target species in the context of animal ethics, we examined the effectiveness of several pitfall-trap capture methods and described capture patterns at Innes National Park, South Australia. For 2606 trap-nights, 78 (2.99 per 100 trap-nights) captures were pygmy possums (70 individuals). They represented 69% of the 113 vertebrates captured, followed by house mice (Mus domesticus) (22%). Nocturnal captures of pygmy possums varied with season (5.21 per 100 trap-nights in spring and summer, and 1.02 in autumn and winter). Males were more commonly captured than females. Half of the pygmy possums used the artificial shelters provided in the traps. We alternated 39-cm-deep and 31-cm-deep pitfall traps along trap lines, with and without drift netting. Pitfall depth did not significantly affect the capture rate of pygmy possums, but house mice were captured significantly more often in deep pitfalls. Use of a drift net did not affect the capture of pygmy possums, but increased mouse captures. These results have significant ethical implications because the use of ‘shallow’ traps and the elimination of the drift net minimised the capture of non-target mice. We recommend reporting trapping details precisely, because a difference of only 8 cm in trap depth can have a significant impact on species selected for capture. Our study also showed that pygmy possums are able to use a range of structures for daily shelter and are not dependent on hollows.
Acknowledgements
We are extremely grateful to Richy Pestell for his support. This study could not have been completed without the valuable assistance of volunteers, particularly Barb and Tony Cook, Tania Martin, Michael Rosewarne, Brian Thomson, Aaron Smith, and Jasmine Winter, who installed pitfalls and drift-net fencing. Special thanks are due to Todd Erickson, Ashley Walker, and Barb Cook for their valuable vegetation identification skills. Thanks also to the Innes National Park staff, particularly Andy Sharp, Caroline Paterson, Jasmine Winter, and Julia Bignall for their assistance, and also to Sue Carthew and Graham Medlin for advice before the start of this research. Janine Slocombe and Robert Aebi were instrumental in providing equipment. Thanks to Bill Holsworth, Zane Adams, Peter Copley, Annette Scanlon, Laura Fuss, Chris Raymond, Magda Kluka, Michael Hodges, Phil Roetman, Helen Waudby, Julia Burnard, Michael Jervois, Kathy Penny, Deb Frazer, Chris Havelberg, Ali Hughes, and Anthony Pieke for eager assistance in the field, to Joan Gibbs for advice on vegetation and ecological patterns, and to Fleur Tiver. Peggy Rismiller, Roger Clay, Damian Morrant, and two anonymous persons kindly reviewed the manuscript. This research was partly funded by a Postgraduate Scholarship from the Nature Foundation South Australia Inc., a grant from the Department for Environment and Heritage’s Northern and Yorke Region, and the University of South Australia provided funding through the Bachelor of Applied Science (Honours) Biodiversity, Environmental, and Park Management Program and through a Divisional Summer Scholarship. The study was conducted under a National Parks and Wildlife Scientific Permit S248411 and approval 59/04 from the IMVS Animal Ethics Committee.
Animal Care and Use Committee (1998). Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. Journal of Mammalogy 79, 1416–1431.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Churchfield, S. (1982). Food availability and the diet of the common shrew, Sorex araneus, in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology 51, 15–28.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Friend, G. R. (1987). Population ecology of Mesembriomys gouldii (Rodentia : Muridae) in the wet–dry tropics of the Northern Territory. Australian Wildlife Research 14, 293–303.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goldingay, R. L. (1989). Time budget and related aspects of the foraging behaviour of the yellow-bellied glider (Petaurus australis). Australian Wildlife Research 16, 105–112.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Körtner, G. , and Geiser, F. (1998). Ecology of natural hibernation in the marsupial mountain pygmy-possum (Burramys parvus). Oecologia 113, 170–178.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Morton, S. R. , Gillam, M. W. , Jones, K. R. , and Fleming, M. R. (1988). Relative efficiency of different pit-trap systems for sampling reptiles in spinifex grasslands. Australian Wildlife Research 15, 571–577.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Packer, W. C. (1965). Environmental influences on daily and seasonal activity in Setonix brachyurus (Quoy and Gaimard) (Marsupialia). Animal Behaviour 13, 270–283.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Quin, D. G. (1995). Population ecology of the squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) and the sugar glider (P. breviceps) (Marsupialia : Petauridae) at Limeburners Creek, on the central north coast of New South Wales. Wildlife Research 22, 471–505.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson, S. A. , Thompson, G. G. , and Withers, P. C. (2005). Influence of pit-trap type on the interpretation of fauna diversity. Wildlife Research 32, 131–137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vernes, K. , and Pope, L. C. (2001). Stability of nest range, home range and movement of the northern bettong (Bettongia tropica) following moderate-intensity fire in a tropical woodland, north-eastern Queensland. Wildlife Research 28, 141–150.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ward, S. J. (1990). Life history of the eastern pygmy-possum, Cercartetus nanus (Burramyidae : Marsupialia), in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 38, 287–304.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ward, S. J. (1992). Life history of the little pygmy possum, Cercartetus lepidus (Marsupialia : Burramyidae), in the Big Desert, Victoria. Australian Journal of Zoology 40, 43–55.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Welsh, A. , Lindenmayer, D. B. , Donnelly, C. F. , and Ruckstuhl, A. (1998). Use of nest trees by the mountain brushtail possum (Trichosurus caninus) (Phalangeridae : Marsupialia). IV. Transitions between den trees. Wildlife Research 25, 611–625.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson, B. A. , and Bradtke, E. (1999). The diet of the New Holland mouse (Pseudomys novaehollandiae (Waterhouse)) in Victoria. Wildlife Research 26, 439–451.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wooller, R. D. , Richardson, K. C. , Garavanta, C. A. M. , Saffer, V. M. , Anthony, C. , and Wooller, S. J. (1998). The influence of annual rainfall upon capture rates of a nectar-dependant marsupial. Wildlife Research 25, 165–169.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wooller, R. D. , Richardson, K. C. , and Bradley, G. O. (1999). Dietary constraints upon reproduction in an obligate pollen- and nectar-feeding marsupial, the honey possum (Tarsipes rostratus). Journal of Zoology 248, 279–287.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |