Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR06012
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 34(6)

Geographical and environmental correlates of big and small game in Andalusia (southern Spain)

J. M. Vargas A B , M. A. Farfán A , J. C. Guerrero A , A. M. Barbosa A and R. Real A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, E-29071 Málaga, Spain.

B Corresponding author. Email: jmvy@uma.es

Wildlife Research 34(6) 498-506 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR06012
Submitted: 27 January 2007  Accepted: 20 September 2007   Published: 2 November 2007

Abstract

In Andalusia, southern Spain, each game estate applies its own rules and presents its results in annual hunting reports, which have been mandatory for Spanish game estates since 1989. We used the information about hunting yields, included in 32 134 annual hunting reports produced during the period 1993/94 to 2001/02 by 6049 game estates, to determine the current distribution of hunting yields of big and small game species in Andalusia. Using generalised linear models and a geographic information system, we determined the most favourable municipalities to big and small game, respectively, and delimited potential areas to attain good hunting yields for big and small game at a 1-km2 resolution. Municipalities and areas favourable to big game are mainly located in the Sierra Morena and the westernmost fringe of the Betic Range, while those favourable to small game occupy the upper Guadalquivir River valley. There is a clear segregation between big and small game species according to the physiography and land uses of the territory. Big game species are typical of Mediterranean woodland areas, while the most emblematic small game species prefer agricultural areas. Our results provide a territorial ordination of hunting yields in southern Spain and have several potential applications in strategic planning for hunting activities and biodiversity conservation in Andalusia that can be extrapolated to other regions.


Acknowledgements

This work was financed by the Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa de la Junta de Andalucía (Research Project P05-RNM-00935) and the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia of the Spanish Government (Research Project CGL2006–09567/BOS).


References

Akaike H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In ‘Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory’. (Eds B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki.) pp. 267–281. (Akademiai Kiado: Budapest.)

Angulo, E. , and Villafuerte, R. (2004). Modelling hunting strategies for the conservation of wild rabbit populations. Biological Conservation 115, 291–301.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Delibes M., and Hiraldo F. (1981). The rabbit as prey in the Iberian Mediterranean Ecosystem. In ‘Proceedings of the World Lagomorph Conference, Guelph, Canada’. (Eds K. Myers and C. D. MacInnes.) pp. 614–622.

FACE (2005). Census of the number of hunters in Europe. http://www.face-europe.org/fs-hunting.htm (updated 21.02.2005).

Farfán, M. A. , Guerrero, J. C. , Real, R. , Barbosa, A. M. , and Vargas, J. M. (2004). Caracterización del aprovechamiento cinegético de los mamíferos en Andalucía. Galemys 16, 41–59.
Font I. (1983). ‘Atlas climático de España.’ (Instituto Nacional de Meteorología: Madrid.)

Font I. (2000). ‘Climatología de España y Portugal.’ (Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca: Salamanca.)

FUNGESMA (Fundación para la Gestión y Protección del Medio Ambiente) (2001). ‘Buenas Prácticas Cinegéticas.’ (Mundiprensa: Madrid.)

García, L. V. (2003). Controlling the false discovery rate in ecological research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 553–554.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Garrido J. L. (2002). Capturas de perdiz roja. In ‘Aportaciones a la Gestión sostenible de la Caza en España’. (Eds A. Lucio and M. Sáenz de Buruaga.) pp. 141–147. (FEDENCA-EEC: Madrid.)

Gortázar, C. , Villafuerte, R. , and Martín, M. (2000). Success of traditional restocking of red-legged partridge for hunting purposes in areas of low density of northeast Spain Aragón. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft 46, 23–30.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hernández-Pacheco E. (1952). ‘El Solar de la Historia hispana.’ Madrid: 270–300.

Hosmer D. W., and Lemeshow S. (1989). ‘Applied Logistic Regression.’ (John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York.)

Junta de Andalucía (1999). ‘Mapa de Usos y Coberturas vegetales del Suelo de Andalucía 1999.’ (Consejería de Medio Ambiente: Sevilla.)

Lehmann, A. , Leathwick, J. R. , and Overton, J. McC. (2002). Assessing New Zealand fern diversity from spatial predictions of species assemblages. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 2217–2238.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Martínez J., Viñuela J., and Villafuerte R. (2002). Reconciling gamebird hunting and biodiversity (REGHAB). Socio-economic aspects of gamebird hunting, hunting bags, and assessment of the status of gamebird populations in REGHAB countries. Part 1: Socio-economic and cultural aspects of gamebird hunting. 52 pp.

Meriggi, A. , and Sacchi, O. (2001). Habitat requirements of wild boars in the northern Apennines (N Italy): a multi-level approach. The Italian Journal of Zoology 68, 47–55.
Montero de Burgos J. L., and González-Rebollar J. L. (1974). ‘Diagramas Bioclimáticos.’ (ICONA, Madrid.)

Monzón, A. , Fernandes, P. , and Rodríguez, N. (2004). Vegetation structure descriptors regulating the presence of wild rabbit in the National Park of Peneda-Gerês, Portugal. European Journal of Wildlife Research 50, 1–6.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Naveh Z., and Lieberman A. S. (1985). ‘Landscape Ecology.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Potts G. R. (2000). Using the scientific method to improve game bird management and research. In ‘Proceedings of the National Quail Symposium’. (Eds L. A. Brennan, W. E. Palmer, L. W. Burguer and T. L. Pruden.) (Tall Timbers Research Station: Tallahase, FL).

Preston, F. W. (1962). The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I. Ecology 43, 185–215.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rands M. R. W. (1988). Habitat quality and gamebird population ecology. In ‘Ecology and Management of Gamebirds’. (Eds P. J. Hudson and M. R. W. Rands.) pp. 134–158. (BSP Professional Books: Oxford.)

Real, R. , Barbosa, A. M. , Martínez-Solano, I. , and García-París, M. (2005). Distinguishing the distributions of two cryptic frogs (Anura: Discoglossidae) using molecular data and environmental modeling. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83, 536–545.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Robertson P. A., and Rosenberg A. A. (1988). Harvesting gamebirds. In ‘Ecology and Management of Gamebirds’. (Eds P. J. Hudson and M. R. W. Rands.) pp. 177–201. (BSP Professional Books: Oxford.)

Santos, P. , Mexia-de-Almeida, L. , and Petrucci-Fonseca, F. (2004). Habitat selection by wild boar Sus scrofa L. in Alentejo, Portugal. Galemys 16, 167–184.
US Geological Survey (1996). GTOPO30. Land Processes Distributed Archive Center, http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30/gtopo30.asp.

Valverde A. J. (1984). Estructura de una comunidad mediterránea de vertebrados terrestres. Monográficas CSIC, 76. 219 p.

Vargas J. M. (2002). ‘Alerta cinegética. Reflexiones sobre el Futuro de la Caza en España.’ (Otero: Madrid.)

Vargas, J. M. , Farfán, M. A. , Guerrero, J. C. , and Real, R. (2004). Caracterización de los aprovechamientos cinegéticos a escala macroespacial: un ejemplo aplicado a la provincia de Granada (sur de España). Ecología 18, 53–70.
Zambrana J. F., Titos M., Fernández M., Garrués J., Heredia V., Hernández S., Lizárraga C., Martín M., Parejo A., and Pellejero C. (2002). ‘Estadísticas del Siglo XX en Andalucía.’ (Instituto de Estadística de Andalucía: Sevilla.)

Zamora, M. , Barasona, J. , and Medina, M. (1976). Aportación al conocimiento del nuevo sistema agrario de las tierras marginales. Archivos de Zootecnia 97, 39–50.